Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The mission of the Quality Innovation Prosperity journal is to dispense updated; original double blind reviewed scientific papers on the quality of work, production and life from any social domains intended for ambitious professionals, academic public and graduate and undergraduate students. 

In addition to the regular, original scientific papers, invited reviews presenting the up-to-date knowledge and monothematic issues devoted to preferred areas of research will be published. 

The principal journal content will be articles focused on designing, measuring, monitoring, analysing and assessing quality and innovations with the objective to arrive at prosperity.

Close attention will be paid to presenting results of those international projects that are of benefit to organisations, regions and countries when boosting a new, cognizant society.

Of maximum value for as the journal publisher so the editorial board is spontaneity of developing democracy, which is conditioned and created by such properties and values as, e.g.:

• Creativity

• Competitiveness

• Team spirit

• Professionalism, etc.


“Knowledge is the result of nonviolent exchange of ideas among free-minded and intelligent people.“

Richard Rorty, Stanford University


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Book reviews

Unchecked Open Submissions Unchecked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed


Unchecked Open Submissions Unchecked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Selected papers from the Q-MOD'2013 conference

  • Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Selected papers from the Q-MOD'2014 conference

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Special Section on Emerging Issues and Challenges: A Korean Perspective


Professor Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park, Lund University, Sweden, e-mail: sumi.park@msm.lu.se

Professor Jens Dahlgaard, Linköping University, Sweden, e-mail: jens.jorn.dahlgaard@liu.se

Professor Hee Jun Park; Yonsei University, Korea, e-mail: h.park@yonsei.ac.kr

Professor Wan Sun Shin, Sungkyunkwan University, Korea, e-mail: wsshin@skku.ac.kr

  • Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Selected papers from the Q-MOD'2016 conference

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Special Section on Universities and Innovation

  • Oto Hudec
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The submitted papers should be original, unpublished, and not in consideration for publication elsewhere at the time of submission to QIP journal. All paper submissions will be refereed in a double-blind review process by at least two international reviewers with expertise in the relevant subject area. Each paper is reviewed by the appropriate member of Editorial Board. If it is judged suitable for this publication, it is then sent to at least two independent referees for double blind peer review. Based on reviewers recommendation, as well as consultation between Editorial Board members the editor decides whether the paper should be accepted as is, revised or rejected. If the reviewer asks for revision of the paper, then the author should make the revision and the paper will be published after the reviewers' acceptance. The reviewers will evaluate the submitted papers against the following checkpoints:

  • Relevance to QIP journal
  • Originality
  • Reference to the related literature
  • Presentation
  • Linguistic quality




Publication Frequency

The publication frequency of the QIP journal is three times/year (March, July, November).


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Self-Archiving Policy

Self-Archiving policy of the Quality Innovation Prosperity journal publisher

Key Principles:

  • QIP journal is fully RoMEO Green archiving policy: Author can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF. See: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeoinfo.html.
  • QIP journal publisher supports an author's right to voluntarily self-archive their works without payment or embargo.

For any specific queries in relation to repositories, please contact editor@qip-journal.eu.


Ethics and Malpractice

The QIP journal is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices. All authors submitting their works to the QIP journal for publication have to be original papers according to Submitting and Copyright rules. The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. In the same manner, the QIP journal publisher is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review of the submitted works for publication and is committed to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. Any departures from the above-defined rules should be reported directly to the Editors-in-Chief, who are unequivocally committed to providing swift resolutions to any of such a type of problems. QIP journal publisher is a member of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) http://publicationethics.org/COPE.



QIP journal is indexed and abstracted in:

  • Scopus 
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index
  • Ebsco 
  • Cabell's Dictionary 
  • DOAJ 
  • EconPapers 
  • RePEC 
  • IDEAS 
  • Gooogle Scholar 
  • ProQuest