Impact of Employees’ Attitudes and Leader’s Role on the Innovation Management Linked to Social Responsibility

Manuela Escobar-Sierra, Mauricio Antonio Bedoya-Villa


Purpose: The innovation management linked to social responsibility is considered a strategy of organizational growth promoted by the creativity of employees framed in economic, ethical and legal issues. This study analyses socially responsible innovation management base on employee’s attitudes and leader’s role, from a case study of a company in the Colombian automotive sector.

Methodology/Approach: We began with the review of theories about innovation and social responsibility. Then we collected data through creative techniques, surveys to classify the leader’s role, attitudes scale, participant observation and interviews. To finally analyse data with multiple linear regression and other techniques, such as decision trees.

Findings: Finally, the initial concept of socially responsible innovation and its management is complemented by five self-determined employees’ attitudes, and one behavior and three perceptions of the leader.

Research Limitation/implication: The choice of the single case study as a research strategy determines the practical scope of the research as analytical. In this sense, the need to replicate the study and analyse the impact of other personal and organizational factors is highlighted.

Originality/Value of paper: It is important to summarise the value of our paper, in relation to the following aspects: the opportunity that represents for companies the correct socially responsible innovation management, the importance of the Enterprise–University integration and, finally, the relevance of hybrid models in this case, a multiple linear regression and decision trees.


innovation; social responsibility; employees’ attitudes; leader’s role; multiple linear regression; decision trees; case study of a company in the Colombian automotive sector

Full Text:



Bedoya, M., Toro, I. and Arango, B. 2017. Emprendimiento Corporativo e Innovación: Una Revisión y Futuras Líneas de Investigación. Espacios, 38(17), pp.20-38.

Beije, P., 1998. Technological change in the modern economy: basic topics and new developments. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Beristain, L.M., 2009. Una revisión de la interpretación económica sobre la innovación. Journal of technology management & innovation, [e-journal] 4(4), pp.139-149.

Biondi, L. and Galli, R., 1992. Technological trajectories. Futures, [e-journal] 24(6), pp.580-592.

Bramanti, A. and Ratti, R., 1997. The multi-faced dimensions of local development. In: R. Ratti, A. Bramanti and R. Gordon, eds. 1997. The Dynamics of Innovative Regions: The GREMI Approach. Aldershot, Brookfield: Ashgate. pp.3-44.

Carroll, A.B., 1979. A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), pp.497-505.

Castrogiovanni, G.J., Urbano, D. and Loras, J., 2011. Linking corporate entrepreneurship and human resource management in SMEs. International Journal Of Manpower, [e-journal] 32(1), pp.34-47.

Cámara de comercio de Medellín para Antioquia, 2013. Revista Antioqueña de Economía y Desarrollo. [pdf] Medellín: Cámara de comercio de Medellín para Antioquia. Available at: < > [Accessed 18 February 2016].

Cooper, R.G. and Cooper, R.G., 2003. Profitable Product Innovation: The Critical Success Factors. In: L.V. Shavinina, ed. 2003. The International Handbook on Innovation. Oxford: Elsevier. pp.139-157.

Corbett, A., Covin, J.G., O'Connor, G.C. and Tucci, CH.L., 2013. Corporate Entrepreneurship: state-of-the-art research and a future research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, [e-journal] 30(5), pp.812-820.

Creswell, J.W., Klassen, A.C., Clack, V.L.P. and Smith, K.C., 2011. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences, Office of behavioral and social sciences research national institutes of health. Washington, DC: NIH Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research.

DANE, 2015. Encuesta de desarrollo e innovación tecnológica - EDIT (industria manufacturera 2013 – 2014). [pdf] Available at: < > [Accessed 22 February 2016].

Dodgson, M., 1993. Technological collaboration in industry: Strategy, policy and internationalisation in innovation. London: Routledge.

Dodgson, M. and Bessant, J.R., 1996. Effective innovation policy: A new approach. London: International Thomson Business Press.

Dosi, G., 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, [e-journal] 11(3), pp.147-162.

Dosi, G., 1988. Sources, Procedures , and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation. Journal of economic literature, 26(3), pp.1120-1171.

Dosi, G. and Egidi, M., 1991. Substantive and procedural uncertainty, An exploration of economic behaviours in changing environments. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, [e-journal] 1(2), pp. 145-168.

Dowrick, S., 1995. Economic approaches to innovation. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Escobar-Sierra, M., 2015. Análisis de la gestión de la innovación vinculada con la responsabilidad social desde las dimensiones motivación y conocimiento: un estudio de caso. Ph. D. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Available at: < > [Accessed 22 February 2016].

Escobar-Sierra, M. and Vera-Acevedo, L.D., 2016. “Inn-Cumbe”: un modelo para la gestión de la innovación socialmente responsable, propuesto a partir de un estudio de caso a nivel organizacional. Espacios, 37(17) [online] Available at: < > [Accessed 22 February 2016].

Feldman, M.P., 1994. The Geography of Innovation. Dordrecht: Springer.

Florida, R., 1995.Toward the learning region. Futures, [e-journal] 27(5), pp.527-536.

Freeman, C., 1982. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. 2nd Ed. London: Printer.

Freeman, C., 1991. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Research Policy, [e-journal] 20(5), pp.499-514.

Freeman, C. and Perez, C., 1988. Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In: D. Preece, I. McLoughlin and P. Dawson, eds. Technology, Organizations and Innovation: Theories, concepts and paradigms. London: Pinter. pp.38-66.

Gann, D.M., 2003. Building innovation: Complex constructs in a changing world. London: Thomas Telford Publishing.

Guadamillas, F. and Donate, M.J., 2008. Responsabilidad social corporativa, conocimiento e innovación: hacia un nuevo modelo de dirección de empresas. Revista europea de dirección y economía de la empresa, 17(3), pp.11-26.

Hadjimanolis, A., 2003. The barriers approach to innovation. In: L.V. Shavinina, ed. 2003. The international handbook on innovation. Oxford: Elsevier. pp.559-573.

Hashimoto, M. and Nassif, V.M.J., 2014. Inhibition and encouragement of entrepreneurial behavior: antecedents analysis from managers’ perspectives. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, [e-journal] 11(4), pp.385-406.

Hobday, M., 1991. Dynamic networks, technology diffusion and complementary assets: Explaining U.S. decline in semiconductors. Falmer: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.

Honkasalo, A., 2000. Eco-efficiency, Entrepreneurship and co-operation: the finnish environmental cluster research programme. In: OECD, ed. 2000. Innovation and the Environment. Paris: OECD. pp.137-142.

Jardón, C.M., 2011. Innovación empresarial y territorio: una aplicación a Vigo y su área de influencia. Eure (Santiago), [e-journal] 37(112), pp.115-139.

Keeble, D., 2000. Collective Learning Processes in European High-Technology Milieux. In: D. Keeble and F. Wilkinson, eds. 2000. High-technology Clusters, Networking and Collective Learning in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate. pp.199-229.

Kirat, T. and Lung, Y., 1999. Innovation and proximity. Territories as loci of collective learning processes. European Urban and Regional Studies, [e-journal] 6(1), pp.27-38.

Kline, S.J. and Rosenberg, N., 1986. An overview of innovation. In: R. Landau and N. Rosenberg, eds. 1986. The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington: National Academy Press. pp.275-305.

Klonoski, R.J., 1991. Foundational considerations in the corporate social responsibility debate. Business Horizons, 34(4), pp.9-19.

Lau, T., Shaffer, M., Chan, K.F. and Man, T.W.Y, 2012. The entrepreneurial behaviour inventory: A simulated incident method to assess corporate entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, [e-journal] 18(6), pp.673-696.

Lawson, C., 2000. Collective learning, system competences and epistemically significant moments. In: D. Keeble and F. Wilkinson, eds. 2000. High-technology Clusters, Networking and Collective Learning in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate. pp.182-198.

Longhi, C. and Keeble, D., 2000. High-tech clusters and collective learning in Europe: regional evolutionary trends in the 1990s. In: D. Keeble and F. Wilkinson, eds. 2000. High-technology Clusters, Networking and Collective Learning in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate. pp.21-56.

Lundvall, B.-Å., 1992. National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.

Macleod, G., 1996. The cult of enterprise in a networked, learning region? Governing business and skills in lowland Scotland. Regional Studies, [e-journal] 30(8), pp.749-755.

Marceau, J., 1992. Reworking the World: Organisations, Technologies, and Cultures in Comparative Perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter studies in organization.

Marinova, D. and Phillimore, J., 2003. Models of innovation. In: L.V. Shavinina, ed. 2003. The international handbook on innovation. Oxford: Elsevier. pp.44-53.

McFadzean, E., O’Loughlin, A. and Shaw, E., 2005. Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation part 1: the missing link. European Journal of Innovation Management, [e-journal] 8(3), pp.350-372.

Méndez, R., 2002. Innovación y desarrollo territorial: algunos debates. Revista EURE, [e-journal] 28(84), pp.63-83.

Merton, R.K., 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Metcalfe, J.S., 1995. Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics, [e-journal] 19(1), pp.25-46.

Morgan, J.N. and Sonquist, J.A., 1963. Problems in the analysis of survey data and a proposal. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(302), pp.415-434.

Nelson, R.R. ed., 1993. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis‏. New York: Oxford University Press, USA.

Nelson, R.R., 2000. National innovation systems. In: Z.J. Ács, ed. 2000. Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change. London: Pinter. pp.11-26.

Parslow, R.A., Christensen, H., Griffiths, K.M. and Groves, CH. 2006. The warpy thoughts scale: a new 20-item instrument to measure dysfunctional attitudes. Cognitive behaviour therapy, [e-journal] 35(2), pp.106-16.

Pavitt, K., Robson, M. and Townsend, J., 1989. Technological Accumulation, Diversification and Organisation in UK Companies, 1945-1983. Management Science, 35(1), pp.81-99.

Perez, C., 1983. Structural Change and Assimilation of New Technologies in the Economic and Social Systems. Futures, [e-journal] 15(5), pp.357-375.

Pernelle, P., Carron, T., Elkadiri, S., Bissay, A. and Marty, J.-C., 2014. PLM serious game approach available both for change management and knowledge assessment. In: S. Fukuda, A. Bernard, B. Gurumoorthy and A. Bouras, eds. 2014. Product Lifecycle Management for a Global Market. PLM 2014. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp.323-332.

Porter, M.E., 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.

Programa de Transformación Productiva, 2015. Sector industrial autopartes y vehiculos. [online] Available at: < > [Accessed 22 February 2016].

Reinig, B.A. and Briggs, R.O., 2013. Putting quality first in ideation research. Group decision and negotiation, [e-journal] 22(5), pp.943-973.

Rodríguez, M.J. and Mora, R.C. eds., 2001. Estadística informática: casos y ejemplos con el SPSS. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.

Rosenberg, N., 1976. Perspectives on Technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rosenberg, N., 2000. Schumpeter and the Endogeneity of Technology: Some American Perspectives. London: Routledge.

Rothwell, R., 1992. Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22(3), pp.221-239.

Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W., 1985. Reindustrialization and Technology. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

Sahal, D., 1981. Patterns of technological innovation. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Sako, M., 1992. Prices, Quality and Trust: Inter-firm Relations in Britain and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schumpeter, J.A., 1983. The theory of economic development. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

Schwartz, M.S. and Carroll, A.B., 2003. Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain approach. Business ethics quarterly, [e-journal] 13(4), pp.503-530.

Shaw, E., O’Loughlin, A. and McFadzean, E., 2005. Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation part 2: a role‐ and process‐based approach. European Journal of Innovation Management, [e-journal] 8(4), pp.393-408.

Simmie, J. ed., 1997. Innovation Networks and Learning Regions?. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Teece, D.J., 2002. Managing intellectual capital: organizational, strategic, and policy dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.

Urbano, D., Toledano, N. and Ribeiro-Soriano, D., 2011. Prácticas de gestión de recursos humanos y desarrollo de nuevos proyectos innovadores: Un estudio de casos en las PYMEs. Universia Business Review, 29, pp.116-130.

Vieira, E.R., Alves, C. and Duboc, L., 2012. Creativity patterns guide: support for the application of creativity techniques in requirements engineering. In: M. Winckler, P. Forbrig, and R. Bernhaupt, eds. 2012. Human-centered software engineering. Berlin: Springer. pp.283-290.

Wolmarans, S. and Martins, N., 2001. The 360 degree emotional competency profiler. Johannesburg: Organisational Diagnostics and Learning Link International.

Yin, R.K., 1992. The case study method as a tool for doing evaluation. Current Sociology, [e-journal] 40(10), pp.121-137.

Yin, R.K., 2002. Case study research: design and methods. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol 5. 3rd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage publications.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Mauricio Antonio Bedoya-Villa, Manuela Escobar-Sierra

ISSN 1335-1745 (print)
ISSN 1338-984X (online)
CCBY crossref cope
Covered, abstracted, indexed in:
Clarivate Analytics Emerging Sources Citation Index; Scopus; Google Scholar; IDEAS; EconPapers; RePEc; Cabells' Directories; Google Scholar