Method of Supplier Selection by Means of Correlation of Quality and Cost Characteristics of Products

Mikhail Gennady Shalygin

Abstract


Purpose: When choosing a supplier, many companies give priority to the lowest cost of products. Problems arise when the consumer wants to buy products with several better quality characteristics, but the products have only one of them. The aim is to establish a link between the quality characteristics of the product and its market value in terms of consumer benefits.

Methodology/Approach: The proposed model is based on determining the importance of criteria that determine the indicators of quality, reliability, characteristics of products and their comparison with the market price at which these products are supplied to the consumer. The model is built on the basis of statistical processing of the data received from consumers about preferences at the choice of production.

Findings: The method of determining the optimal supplier based on the cost and quality indicators of the product. Some indicators of the quality of products and their ranking by significance for the consumer are given. It gives the examples of calculation methods for univariate and two-factor analysis. It shows the ways of diagramming the determination of values of factors of production.

Research Limitation/implication: The model is relevant only at close market value of production for the consumer.

Originality/Value of paper: The methodology of criteria-based evaluation of the quality indicators of the supplied products or services allows making a selection of a products supplier on the basis of quality characteristics of the supplied products.

Keywords


supplier selection; the quality of the products; the reliability of the supplier; multivariate analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agovino, M., Aldieri, L., Garofalo, A. and Vinci, C.P., 2017. Quality and quantity in the innovation process of firms: a statistical approach. Quality & Quantity, 51(4), pp. 1579-1591. doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0353-y.

Ebrahimipour, V., Shoja, B.M. and Li, S., 2016. Supplier selection considering product structure and product life cycle cost. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 33(5), pp. 654-675. doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-05-2015-0069.

Gallouj, F. and Weinstein, O., 1997. Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26(4-5), pp. 537-556.

Goldman, S.L. and Nagel, R.N., 1993. Management, technology, and agility: the emergence of a new era in manufacturing. International Journal of Technology Management, 8(1-2), pp. 18-38.

Goldman, S.L., Nagel, R.N. and Preiss, K., 1995. Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Hajduova, Z., 2014. Integrated cost model for improving the production in companies. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 18(2), pp. 90-99. doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V18I2.379.

He, Y., Chan, L.K. and Tse, S.-K., 2008. From consumer satisfaction to repurchase intention: The role of price tolerance in a competitive service market. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 19(9), pp. 949-961. doi.org/10.1080/14783360802224628.

Lin, L.-Z. and Hsu, T.-H., 2008. The Qualitative and Quantitative Models for Performance Measurement Systems: The Agile Service Development. Quality & Quantity, 42(227), pp. 445-476. doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9053-3.

Omachonu, V.K., Suthummanon, S. and Einspruch, N.G., 2004. The relationship between quality and quality cost for a manufacturing company. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21(3), pp.277-290.

Saaty, T.L., 1996. The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

Sánchez, J.A.L., Vijande, M.L.S. and Gutiérrez, J.A.T., 2012. Value-creating functions, satisfaction and loyalty in business markets: a categorical variable approach using a robust methodology under structural equation modeling. Quality & Quantity, 46(3), pp. 777-794. doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9413-x.

Shalygin, M.G., 2012. The state and prospects of development of machine-building complex of the Bryansk region. Construction and road machines, 1, pp. 50-52.

Sysolyatin, A.V., 2014. The choice of the supplier in the procurement activities of trading companies. Nauka-rastudent.ru, [e-journal] 12, pp. 24-38. Available at: < http://nauka-rastudent.ru/12/2256/ > [Accessed 13 August 2018].

Tran, D.-H., Luong-Duc, L., Duong, M.-T., Le, T.-H. and Pham, A.-D., 2018. Opposition multiple objective symbiotic organisms search (OMOSOS) for time, cost, quality and work continuity tradeoff in repetitive projects. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 5(2), pp. 160-172. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2017.11.008.

Visawan, D. and Tannock, J., 2004. Simulation of the economics of quality improvement in manufacturing: A case study from the Thai automotive industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21(6), pp.638-654. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710410542043.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/qip.v22i3.1189

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Mikhail Gennady Shalygin

ISSN 1335-1745 (print)
ISSN 1338-984X (online)
CCBY crossref cope
Covered, abstracted, indexed in:
 
Clarivate Analytics Emerging Sources Citation Index; Scopus; Google Scholar; IDEAS; EconPapers; RePEc; Cabells' Directories; Google Scholar