Influence of the Interaction Between Parts and Appraisers on the Results of Repeatability and Reproducibility Analysis
Article Sidebar
Issue
Vol. 16 No. 1 (2012)
Keywords:
-
GRR study, interactions between parts and appraisers, average and range method, ANOVA
Abstract
The paper deals with the influence of interactions between parts and appraisers on the results of the analysis of repeatability and reproducibility of the measurement system. The appropriate interactions have been created by simulated changes of selected values measured within the framework of real gauge repeatability and reproducibility study and evaluation was performed using average and range method and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Effects of changes type and size on the results of the analysis (%EV – repeatability; %AV – reproducibility; %INT – interaction between operators and parts; %GRR – gauge repeatability and reproducibility; ndc – number of distinct categories) are compared and mechanisms of these effects are analysed.
References
AIAG Reference manual, (2010), Measurement Systems Analysis. MSA. 4th Edition., AIAG, Southfield.
Burdick, R. K, Borror, C. M, Montgomery, D. C. (2005), Design and Analysis of Gauge R&R Studies: Making Decisions with Confidence Intervals in Random and Mixed ANOVA Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kazerouni, A, M. (2009), “Design and Analysis of Gauge R&R Studies: Making Decisions Based on ANOVA Method”, in Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 40 No.4, pp. 31 – 35
Klaput, P., Plura, J. (2011), “The Importance of Graphical Tools for Measurement Systems Analysis.”, in Proceedings of QMOD Conference on Quality and Service Sciences 2011, Servicios de Publicaciones Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain, 29-31 August, 17 p.
Klaput, P., Plura, J. (2012), “Influence of Used Method on the Results of Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility Study”, in Proceedings of Metal 2012 21st International conference on Metallurgy and Materials, Tanger, Brno, Czec Republic, 23 – 25 May, 6 p.
Osma, A. (2011), “An assessment of the robustness of gauge repeatability and reproducibility analysis in automotive components”, Journal of Automotive Engineering, Vol. 225, Issue 7, pp. 895 – 912
Petrík, P., Palfy, P. (2011), “The Influence of the Load on the Hardness”, Metrology and Measurement Systems, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 223-234.
Plura, J. (2001), Quality Planning and Continuous Quality Improvement. 1st edition (in Czech). Computer Press, Prague.
Burdick, R. K, Borror, C. M, Montgomery, D. C. (2005), Design and Analysis of Gauge R&R Studies: Making Decisions with Confidence Intervals in Random and Mixed ANOVA Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kazerouni, A, M. (2009), “Design and Analysis of Gauge R&R Studies: Making Decisions Based on ANOVA Method”, in Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 40 No.4, pp. 31 – 35
Klaput, P., Plura, J. (2011), “The Importance of Graphical Tools for Measurement Systems Analysis.”, in Proceedings of QMOD Conference on Quality and Service Sciences 2011, Servicios de Publicaciones Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain, 29-31 August, 17 p.
Klaput, P., Plura, J. (2012), “Influence of Used Method on the Results of Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility Study”, in Proceedings of Metal 2012 21st International conference on Metallurgy and Materials, Tanger, Brno, Czec Republic, 23 – 25 May, 6 p.
Osma, A. (2011), “An assessment of the robustness of gauge repeatability and reproducibility analysis in automotive components”, Journal of Automotive Engineering, Vol. 225, Issue 7, pp. 895 – 912
Petrík, P., Palfy, P. (2011), “The Influence of the Load on the Hardness”, Metrology and Measurement Systems, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 223-234.
Plura, J. (2001), Quality Planning and Continuous Quality Improvement. 1st edition (in Czech). Computer Press, Prague.
Authors
Plura, J., & Klaput, P. (2012). Influence of the Interaction Between Parts and Appraisers on the Results of Repeatability and Reproducibility Analysis. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 16(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v16i1.59
Copyright and license info is not available