The City of Business: the Functional, the Relational-Cognitive and the Hierarchical-Distributive Approach

Roberto Camagni

Abstract


Purpose: The main purpose of the paper is to highlight some limits of the traditional theoretical interpretation of the relationships between the city and economic activities. This interpretation usually makes reference to two elements: agglomeration economies, cumulatively generating gains in efficiency and consequently in competitiveness and attractiveness and external connectivity, linked to multiple networks of both physical and immaterial nature. This approach, mainly functional and geographical, nowadays looks quite reductionist and overlooks crucial aspects of the urban realm that explain urban economic success  The first aspect concerns the social and cultural nature of the main inter-personal and inter-institutional relationships taking place inside the city, conducive to crucial processes of cooperation, collective learning, creativity and innovation.  In addition to this, the growing concentration on (mainly large) cities of command and control functions which not only witnesses the presence of their political power – underlined by a growing literature in geography and political science – but also widely determines income distribution in space, at the local, national and global scale. The functional interpretation of the city should be complemented by a relational-cognitive and hierarchical-distributive approach. The latter one is particularly interesting for the interpretation of the development of ‘monopolistic’ cities which operate on economic functions in which they can benefit from a captive market: capital cities and art cities in particular.

Methodology/Approach: While the first part of the paper is mainly theoretical, it  presents also an empirical side in the second issue, namely the destiny of medium-sized cities. The last section of the paper concerns a logical turnaround: ‘cities as businesses’ where high surpluses are generated in the real estate field, taking advantage of the economic success of the cities themselves and appropriating a consistent share of the generated profits in the form of land rents.

Findings: The traditional view is that medium-sized cities cannot take full advantage of agglomeration economies and therefore will necessarily show lower growth rates in the long term. This paper argues against this view, on both theoretical and empirical grounds, looking at the evidence of European cities in the last twenty years. In many countries, this process should be more appropriately taxed in order to allow sustainable and socially equilibrated development: a fairer sharing of these surplus-values between private and public parties is justified by the collective nature of urban externalities.

Originality/Value of paper: The implications of the arguments presented here are relevant on both the interpretative and policy ground. The sources of urban economic success are not linked only to functional or efficiency elements but also to cultural-psychological and to power elements. The former ones require subtler policy strategies and the latter more appropriate policy tools oriented towards the widely ignored challenge of income distribution in space.


Keywords


interpretation of cities; agglomeration economies; urban competitiveness; income distribution in space; large vs. medium cities

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrams, P., 1978. Towns and economic growth: some theories and problems. In: P. Abrams and E.A. Wrigley, ed. 1978. Towns in Societies: Essays in Economic History and Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 9 - 33.

Alderson, A.S. and Beckfield, J., 2004. Power and position in the world city system. American Journal of Sociology, 109(4), pp.811-851.

Amin, A. and Robins, K., 1991. These are not Marshallian times. In: R. Camagni, ed. 1991. Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. London: Belhaven-Pinter. pp. 105 - 118.

Amin, A. and Thrift, N., 2002. Cities: Reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Aydalot, P. and Camagni, R., 1986. Tertiarisation et développement des metropoles: un modèle de simulation du développement regional. Revue d’économie régionale et urbaine, 25, pp.171-186.

Braudel, F., 1977. Afterthoughts on material civilization and capitalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Braudel, F., 1979. Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme, Xve-XVIIIe siècle. 1. Paris: Armand Colin.

Calafati, A., 2009. Macro-regions, local systems and cities: conceptualization of territory in Italy since 1950. Scienze Regionali – Italian Journal of Regional Science, Special issue 8(3), pp.11-34.

Camagni, R., 1980. Teorie e modelli di localizzazione delle attività industriali. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 39(3-4), pp.183-204.

Camagni, R., 1991a. Technological Change, Uncertainty and Innovation Networks: Towards Dynamic Theory of Economic Space. In: R. Camagni, ed. 1991. Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. London: Belhaven-Pinter. pp. 121 - 144.

Camagni, R. ed., 1991b. Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. London: Belhaven-Pinter.

Camagni, R., 1992. Economia Urbana: principi e modelli teorici. Firenze: la Nuova Italia Scientifica. French translation: Théories et modèles de l’Economie Urbaine. Paris: Economica.1996.

Camagni, R., 2001. The economic role and spatial contradictions of global city-regions: the functional, cognitive and evolutionary context. In: A.J. Scott, ed. 2001. Global city-regions: trends, theory, policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 96 - 118.

Camagni, R., 2016a. Towards creativity-oriented innovation policies based on a hermeneutic approach to then knowledge-space nexus. In: A. Cusinato and A. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, eds. 2016. Knowledge-creating milieus in Europe: firms, cities, territories. Berlin: Springer. pp. 341 - 358.

Camagni, R., 2016b. Urban development and control on urban land rents. The Annals of Regional Science, 56(3), pp.597-615.

Camagni, R. and Capello, R., 2015. Second Rank City Dynamics: Theoretical Interpretations behind Their Growth Potentials. European Planning Studies, 23(6), pp.1041-1053.

Camagni, R., Capello, R. and Caragliu, A., 2016. Static vs. Dynamic Agglomeration Economies: Spatial Context and Structural Evolution behind Urban Growth. Regional Science, 95(1), pp.133-158.

Castells, M., 1992. The Informational City. Chichester: Wiley.

Crevoisier, O. and Camagni, R. eds., 2000. Les milieu urbains: innovation, systèmes de production et ancrage. Neuchâtel: GREMI – EDES.

Cusinato, A., 2016a. A comment on Scott and Storper’s ‘The nature of cities: the scope and limits of urban theory’. Papers in Regional Science, 95(4), pp.895-901.

Cusinato, A., 2016b. A hermeneutic approach to the knowledge economy. In: A. Cusinato and A. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, eds. 2016. Knowledge-creating milieus in Europe: firms, cities, territories. Berlin: Springer. pp. 97 - 136.

Fourquet, F. and Murard L., 1973. Les equipments du pouvoir: Villes, Territoires et equipements collectifs. Paris: Union Generale d'Editions.

Friedman, J., 1969. On the contradictions between city and countryside. In: H. Folmer and J. Osterhaaven, eds. 1969. Spatial inequalities and regional development. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. pp. 23 - 45.

Friedmann, J., 1986. The World City Hypothesis. Development and Change, 17(1), pp.69-83.

Glaeser, E.L., 2011. Triumph of the city: how our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. New York: Penguin Books.

Harvey, D., 1989. The urban experience. Baltimode: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Henderson, V.J., 2010. Cities and development. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), pp.515-540.

Hymer, S., 1972. The Multinational Corporation and the Law of Uneven Development. In: J. Bhagwati, ed. 1972. Economics and World Order. New York: Free Press. pp. 113 - 140.

Krugman, P., 1991. Geography and trade. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

Jacobs, J., 1969. The economy of cities. New York: Vintage.

Martin, R., 2006. The economic competitiveness of cities: conceptual and theoretical issues. State of the Cities Report for the UK Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. London.

Meijers, E.J, Burger, M.J. and Hoogerbrugge, M.M, 2016. Borrowing size in networks of cities: City size, network connectivity and metropolitan functions in Europe. Papers in Regional Science, 95(1), pp.181-198.

Marx, C. and Engels, F., 1970. The German Ideology. New York: International Publishers Co.

Nijkamp, P. and Kourtit, K., 2013. New Urban Europe: Global Challenges and Local Responses in the Urban Century. European Planning Studies, 21(3), pp.91-315.

Plato, 1968. The Republic. New York: Basic Books.

Rémy, J., 1999. La ville, phénomène économique. Paris: Economica.

Rémy, J., 2000. Villes et milieu innovateurs: une matrice d’interrogations. In: O. Crevoisier and R. Camagni, eds. 2000. Les milieu urbains: innovation, systèmes de production et ancrage. Neuchâtel: GREMI – EDES, pp.33-43.

Roncayolo, M., 1990. La ville et ses territoires. Paris: Gallimard.

Sassen, S., 1991. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Scott, A. ed., 2001. Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scott, A., 2015. City and society: an inquiry on urban development and its meaning for work and life in the twenty-first century. In: C. Diks, C. Hommes and M. Van der Leij. 2015. 10th Tinbergen Institute Conference: Complexity in Economics and Finance. Amsterdam, Netherland, 18-20 May 2015. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute.

Scott, A. and Storper, M., 2015. The nature of cities: the scope and limits of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional research, 39(1), pp.1-15.

Smith, A., 1976. An inquiry into the nature and the causes of the wealth of nations. In: R.H. Campbell and A.S. Skinner, eds. 1976. The Glasgow edition of the Works and correspondence of Adam Smith, vol. II. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc.

Taylor, P., Derudder, B., Saey, P. and Witlox, F. eds., 2007. Cities in globalization: Practices, Policies and Theories. Abigdon: Routledge.

UN-Habitat, 1976. The Vancouver Declaration. Vancouver, Canada, 31 May-11 June 1976. Vancouver: United Nations Conference on Human Settlements.

UN-Habitat, 2013. Urban planning for city leaders. 2nd Edition. Nairobi: UNON, Publishing Services Section.

UN Habitat, 2016. The City we Need 2.0. Towards a New Urban Paradigm. Adopted on 16 March 2016 in Prague/Czech Republic.

World Bank, 2009. World Development Report. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/qip.v21i1.818

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Roberto Camagni

ISSN 1335-1745 (print)
ISSN 1338-984X (online)
CCBY crossref cope
Indexed in:

SCOPUSEBSCO DOAJ Cabells
Econ papersIdeas RePecGoogle scholar