Using of Performance Appraisal Methods in Czech and Slovak Organisations

Hana Urbancová, Katarina Stachová, Zdenko Stacho

Abstract


Purpose: People, their knowledge, abilities and skills are considered to be the most valuable source every organisation can exploit. It is, therefore, necessary to care about their fair remuneration and continuing development, as well as their objective and fair appraisal. Implementing an effective appraisal system in the personnel strategy, satisfying both employers and employees, is an essential part of the success of all competing organisations. The aim is to evaluate the use of employee appraisal methods in the selected Czech and Slovak organisations, and to recommend proposals for improvement on the grounds of such evaluation.

Methodology/Approach: The data were obtained in two quantitative researches conducted in the selected organisations in the Czech Republic (n = 402) and the Slovak Republic (n = 339). Univariate analysis, bivariate analysis and analysis of qualitative traits were employed in order to evaluate results.

Findings: The results showed that 58.46% of the interviewed Czech organisations and 69.32% of the Slovak organisations had established a formal system of employee appraisal. Most of them were medium-sized enterprises with an HR department, operating in the private sector.

Research Limitation/implication: Limits can be seen in to focus on research in two selected countries, but they have comparable from historical, political and the job market perspectives.

Originality/Value of paper: The article focused on using of modern performance appraisal methods in practice to build the employer’s good brand and attract knowledge workers.

Keywords


human resource management; performance appraisal methods; organisations; the Czech Republic; the Slovak Republic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arthur, D., 2010. 70 tipů pro hodnocení pracovníků. Prague: GRADA.

Anderson, V., 2009. Research Method in Human Resource Management. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel Development.

Bernardin, H.J. and Beatty, R.W., 1984. Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston: Kent.

Blašková, M., 2011. Rozvoj ľudského potenciálu Motivovanie, komunikovanie, harmonizovanie a rozhodovanie. Žilina: Edis.

Diaz-Fernandez, M., Bornay-Barrachina, M. and Lopez-Cabrales, A., 2015. Innovation and firm performance: the role of human resource management practices. Evidence-based HRM, 3 (1), pp.64-80.

De Vaus, D., 2002. Surveys in Social Research. London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.

El Baradei, L. and Newcomer, K.E., 2008. A human capital management assessment tool for identifying training and development needs: application to Egyptian public organisations. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 1(2), pp.119-149.

Evans, W.R. and Davis, W.D., 2015. High-Performance Work Systems as an Initiator of Employee Proactivity and Flexible Work Processes. Organisation Management Journal, 12(2), pp.64-74.

Hageman, M.G.J.S., Ring, D.C., Gregory, P.J., Rubash, H.E. and Harmon, L., 2015. Do 360-degree Feedback Survey Results Relate to Patient Satisfaction Measures?. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 473(5), pp.1590-1597.

Hitka, M., Lorincová, S., Ližbetinová, L. and Schmidtová, J., 2017. Motivation Preferences of Hungarian and Slovak Employees are Significantly Different. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 25(2), pp.117-126.

Chianchana, C. and Wichian, S.N., 2016. Assessment of performance competency in the organization: Dimensionality oriented assessment. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 13(2), pp.27-35.

Kromrei, H., 2015. Enhancing the annual performance appraisal process: Reducing biases and engaging employees through self-assessment. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 28(2), pp.53-64.

Lindner, F. and Wald, A., 2011. Success factors of knowledge management in temporary organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 29, pp.877-888.

Levy, M., 2011. Knowledge retention: minimizing organizational business loss. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(4), pp. 582-600.

Pardey, D. and May, T., 2014. Paper 4: Motivation and Rewards. [pdf] Institute of Leadership and Management Research. Available at: < https://www.institutelm.com/ > [Accessed 02 October 2017].

Shih, H.C. and Huang, Y.C., 2011. A new mode of learning organization. International Journal of Manpower, 32(5-6), pp.623-644.

Snell, S. and Bohlander, G., 2010. Managing Human Resources. United States: Copyright Act.

Văcărescu Hobeanu, L., 2015. The performances assessment - Assessment methods and techniques of the professional performances. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 10(2), pp.262-278.

Yang, S. and Zhu, Q., 2008. An evaluation model on employee performance based on improved BP neural network. In: IEEE, 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 12-17 October 2008. Dalian, China: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).

Wilson, A.M., 2001. The role of mystery shopping in the measurement of service performance. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 8(6), pp.414-420.

Wong, N.W., 2009. The strategic skills of business continuity managers: putting business continuity management into corporate long-term planning. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, 4(1), pp.62-68.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/qip.v21i3.890

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Hana Urbancová, Katarina Stachová, Zdenko Stacho

ISSN 1335-1745 (print)
ISSN 1338-984X (online)
CCBY crossref cope
Covered, abstracted, indexed in:
 
Clarivate Analytics Emerging Sources Citation Index; Scopus; Google Scholar; IDEAS; EconPapers; RePEc; Cabells' Directories; Google Scholar