Purpose: In current economy, where ICT plays a crucial role for being competitive and effective, businesses are facing higher pressures of flexibility and efficiency than ever before. Transparency is often considered as a suitable mechanism for better market prices and more efficient market environment. Electronic business environment provides the possibility to set up more transparent environment and bring higher competitiveness and efficiency on the market. The paper analyse the impact of transparency on prices in e-procurement.
Methodology: Reverse auctions are considered as transparent tool simulating in partial level real competition. Together, it allows to examine several levels of transparency set up in auction negotiation process. The impact of transparency on final prices was analysed on real data using relation based analysis were different situations of transparency set up is compared against achieved final price.
Findings: Research results based on real data shows, that generally, the transparency in electronic reverse auction can lead to more negative prices agreed by purchasers as current scientific and commercial promotions.
Research limitation: Significance of research results is limited due to still low readiness and skills of e-procurers. The validation of results is needed to realized within longer period of time and from environments with different level of e-readiness. Together, it reveal that transparency is more complex issue where the significance of transparency can reveal its sense in some specific situations on the market and negotiation.
Value of paper: Evidenced based research reveal some controversy results which support new scientific efforts in microeconomics and socio-economic impact of ICT fields. Together, it affects real practitioners in way how to use and perceive claimed impact of reverse auction solutions.
Dor?ák, P., Pollák, F. and Szabo, S., 2014. Analysis of the possibilities of improving an online reputation of public institutions. In: IDIMT 2014: Networking Societies - Cooperation and Conflict, 22nd Interdisciplinary Information Management Talks, Sept. 10-12, 2014, Podebrady, Czech Republic, pp.275-282.
Doucek, P., 2004. E-Society - Perspectives and Risks for European Integration. In HOFER, C. - CHROUST, G. (ed.). IDIMT-2004. Linz: Trauner Verlag universitat, 2004, pp.35-42. ISBN 3-85487-665-3.
Granados, N., Gupta, A. and Kauffman, R.J., 2008. Designing online selling mechanisms: Transparency levels and prices. Decision Support Systems, 45(4), November 2008, pp.729-745.
Grzebyk M., 2010. Determinants influencing the competitiveness of local government units. In: Ekonomicky rozvoj a management regionu, Hradec Kralove, 2- 3 February, 2010, pp.95-98, ISBN 978-80-7435-040-5.
Gu, Y., Hehenkamp, B., 2010. The Inefficiency of MarketTransparency - A Model with Endogenous Entry. BeiträgezurJahrestagung des VereinsfürSocialpolitik 2010: Ökonomie der Familie - Session: Oligopolistic Competition and NetworkFormation, No. F9-V2. [PDF] Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/37416.
Hansen, M., Mathews, B., Mosconi, B. and Sankaran, V., 2001. A buyer’s guide to B-to-B markets. McKinsey Quarterly, 2, pp.33–35.
Janke, F., 2011. The Use of Hidden Data in Electronic Business Networks: Benchmark and Network Performance Indicators. In: IDIMT-2011: Interdisciplinarity in Complex Systems: 19th Interdisciplinary Information Management Talks: 7. - 9.9.2011,
Jindřichův Hradec, pp.341-348, ISBN 978-3-85499-873-0.
OECD, 2001. Price Transparency. Policy roundtables. DAFFE/CLP(2001)22. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/52/63/2535975.pdf.
Ozcelik, Y. and Ozdemir, Z. D., 2011. Market Transparency in Business-to-Business e-Commerce: A Simulation Analysis. International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), 7(4), pp.62-78.
Phama, L., Teichc, J., Walleniusd, H. and Wallenius, J., 2014. Multi-attribute online reverse auctions: Recent research trends. European Journal of Operational Research, 7 October 2014, [online] Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.043.
Schoder, D., 1995. Erfolg und MißerfolgtelematischerInnovationen, Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts- Verlag.
Schoenherr, T. and Mabert, V.A., 2007. Online reverse auctions: Common myths versus evolving reality. Business Horizons, 50(5), September–October 2007, pp.373-384.
Soh, Ch., Markus, M. L. and Goh, Kim H., 2006. Electronic Marketplaces and Price Transparency: Strategy, Information Technology, and Success. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), pp.705-723.
Szabo, S., Dorcák, P. and Ferencz, V., 2013. The significance of global market data for smart E-Procurement processes. In: IDIMT 2013 - Information Technology Human Values, Innovation and Economy, 21st Interdisciplinary Information Management Talks, Sept. 11-13, 2013, Prague, Czech Republic. pp.217-224.
Weitzel, T., Wendt, O. and König, W., 2003. Towards an Interdisciplinary Theory of Networks. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Naples, Italy, 2003.
Zhu, K., 2004. Information Transparency of Business-to-BusinessElectronic Markets: A Game-Theoretic Analysis. Management Science, 50(5), May 2004, pp.670–685.