CSR Expenditure and Company Performance: Charity or Signal? Evidence from Indonesia
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study are: first, to investigate CSR expenditures made by public companies in Indonesia are whether aimed at the charity, and second, whether CSR expenditure is related to the corporate’s performance in the future.
Methodology/Approach: The samples are taken from 53 companies registered at the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Measurement of CSR expenditure uses monetary unit because CSR expenditure is the actual expenditure of the company. Company performance variables use ROA and CFO.
Findings: The result indicates that CSR expenditures by companies in Indonesia are aimed at charity and are not related to their future performance. In addition, the CFO is also not related to CSR expenditure. This finding indicates that the expenditure of corporate CSR in Indonesia is only limited to fulfilling corporate social responsibility to the community without expecting repayment and to fulfill applicable regulatory obligations. Thus the resulting decision is a charity decision, not a signal.
Research Limitation/implication: Sample in this study is limited to only company that reports CSR expenditure data in its annual report. The problem is that this disclosure is not mandatory in Indonesia so we cannot put all of public companies into our study. Our findings must be interpreted with this sample limitation problem.
Originality/Value of paper: Our study contributes to understanding of motives of corporation in CSR spending. Corporations that operate in Indonesia are not only local corporations. Some are foreign companies that operate in Indonesia. Even though this Indonesian-based foreign corporation has its CSR program running in Indonesia, the program actually made by its home office abroad. While the CSR activity is used as signal in the home country, the purpose is not the same in Indonesia.Full text article
References
Aly, D., El-Halaby, S. and Hussainey, K., 2018. Tone disclosure and financial performance: evidence from Egypt. Accounting Research Journal, [e-journal] 31(1), pp.63-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-09-2016-0123.
Amos, G.J., 2018. Researching corporate social responsibility in developing-countries context: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Law and Management, [e-journal] 60(2,) pp.284-310. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-04-2017-0093.
Bénabou, R. and Tirole, J., 2010. Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, [e-journal] 77(305), pp.1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00843.x.
Beyer, A., Cohen, D.A., Lys, T.Z. and Walther, B.R., 2010. The Financial Reporting Environment: Review of the Recent Literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, [e-journal] 50(2-3), pp.296-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.003.
Bose, S., Podder, J. and Biswas, K., 2017. Philanthropic giving, market-based performance and institutional ownership: Evidence from an emerging economy. The British Accounting Review, [e-journal] 49(4), pp.429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.11.001.
Bowen, H.R., 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper.
Brammer, S., Brooks, Ch. and Pavelin, S., 2006. Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures. Financial Management, [e-journal] 35(3), pp.97-116.
Brammer, S. and Millington, A., 2008. Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, [e-journal] 29(12), pp.1325-1343. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.714.
Cai, Y., Pan, C.H. and Statman, M., 2016. Why do countries matter so much in corporate social performance?. Journal of Corporate Finance, [e-journal] 41, pp.591-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.09.004.
Campbell, J.L., 2007. Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), pp.946-967.
Carroll, A.B, 2004. Managing ethically with global stakeholders: a present and future challenge. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), pp.114-120.
Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy (CECP), 2008. Giving in Numbers 2008. [pdf] New York, USA: CECP. Available at: < http://www.corporatephilanthropy.org/pdfs/benchmarking-reports/GivinginNumbers2008.pdf > [Accessed 10 August 2019].
Dainelli, F., Bini, L. and Giunta, F., 2013. Signaling strategies in annual reports: Evidence from the disclosure of performance indicators. Advances in Accounting. [e-journal] 29(2), pp.267-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2013.09.003.
Darmadi, S., 2013. Board members’ education and firm performance: evidence from a developing economy. International Journal of Commerce and Management, [e-journal] 23(2), pp.113-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/10569211311324911.
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, Ch.C.Y. and Mishra, D.R., 2011. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?. Journal of Banking and Finance, [e-journal] 35(9), pp.2388-2406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007.
Esteban-Sanchez, P., De la Cuesta-Gonzalez, M. and Paredes-Gazquez, J.D., 2017. Corporate social performance and its relation with corporate financial performance: International evidence in the banking industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, [e-journal] 162, pp.1102-1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.127.
Fombrun, C.J., 2005. Building corporate reputation through CSR initiatives: evolving standards. Corporate Reputation Review, [e-journal] 8, pp.7-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540235.
Friedman, M., 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13 September.
Galaskiewicz, J., 1991. Making corporate actors accountable. Institution-building in Minneapolis-St. Paul. In: P.J. DiMaggio and W.W. Powell, eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, Il: The University of Chicago Press. Chapter 12.
Griffin, J.J. and Prakash, A., 2014. Corporate Responsibility: Initiatives and Mechanisms. Business and Society, [e-journal] 53(4), pp.465-482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313478975.
Hackston, D. and Milne, M., 1996. Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand. Journal Accounting Auditing and Accountability, [e-journal] 9(1), pp.77-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579610109987.
Healy, P.M. and Palepu, K.G., 2000. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, [e-journal] 31, pp.405-440.
Hillman, A.J. and Keim, G.D., 2001. Shareholder value, stake- holder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), pp.125-139.
Hong, H., Kubik, J. and Scheinkman, J., 2012. Financial Constraints on Corporate Goodness. [online] Available at SSRN: < https://ssrn.com/abstract=1734164 > [Accessed 19 November 2019].
Hopwood, A.G., 2009. Accounting and the environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, [e-journal] 34(3-4), pp.433-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.03.002.
Humphrey, J.E., Lee, D.D. and Shen, Y., 2012. Does it cost to be sustainable?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(3), pp.626-639.
Chapple, W. and Moon, J., 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia A Seven-Country Study of CSR Web Site Reporting. Bussines and Society, [e-journal] 44(4), pp.415-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305281658.
Chen, L., Feldmann, A. and Tang, O., 2015. The relationship between disclosures of corporate social performance and financial performance: evidences from GRI reports in manufacturing industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 170(Part B), pp.445-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.04.004.
Ching, H.Y. and Gerab, F., 2017. Sustainability reports in Brazil through the lens of signaling, legitimacy and stakeholder theories. Social Responsibility Journal, [e-journal] 13(1), pp.95-110. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2015-0147.
Choi, J. and Wang, H., 2007. The Promise of a Managerial Values Approach to Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, [e-journal] 75(4), pp.345-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9257-4.
Christensen, H.B., Floyd, E., Liu, L.Y. and Maffett, M., 2017. The real effects of mandated information on social responsibility in financial reports: Evidence from mine-safety records. Journal of Accounting and Economics, [e-journal] 64(2-3), pp.284-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.08.001.
John, K. and Williams, J., 1985. Dividends, dilution, and taxes: a signaling equilibrium. Journal of Finance, 40(4), pp.1053-1070.
Kreander, N., Beattie, V. and McPhail, K., 2009. Putting our money where their mouth is: Alignment of charitable aims with charity investment setensions in policy and practice. The British Accounting Review, 41(3), pp.154-168.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia number 40 of 2007 concerning limited liability companies.
Lech, A., 2013. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance Theoretical and Empirical Aspects. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, [e-journal] 16(3), pp.49-62. https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2013-0018.
Lev, B., Petrovits, Ch. and Radhakrishnan, S., 2010. Is Doing Good For You? How Corporate Charitable Contributions Enhance Revenue Growth. Strategic Management Journal, [e-journal] 31(2), pp.182- https://doi.org/200.10.1002/smj.810.
Lys, T., Naughton, J. and Wang, C., 2015. Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, [e-journal] 60(1), pp.56-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.03.001.
Mahoney, S.L., Thorne, L., Cecil, L. and LaGore, W., 2013. A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing?. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, [e-journal] 24(4-5), pp.350-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.008.
Miller, M. and Rock, K., 1985. Dividend policy under asymmetric information. Journal of Finance, [e-journal] 40(4), pp.1031-1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb02362.x.
Navarro, P., 1988. Why Do Corporations Give to Charity?. The Journal of Business, 61(1), pp.65-93.
Nollet, J., Filis, G. and Mitrokostas, E., 2016. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling, [e-journal] 52(Part B), pp.400-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.019.
Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A. and Tharyan, R., 2016. Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review, [e-journal] 48(1), pp.102-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007.
Ragodoo, N.J.F., 2009. CSR as a tool to fight against poverty: the case of Mauritius. Social Responsibility Journal, [e-journal] 5(1), pp.19-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471110910939971.
Rhou, Y., Singal, M. and Koh, Y., 2016. CSR and financial performance: The role of CSR awareness In the Restaurant industry. Journal of Hospitality Management, [e-journal] 57, pp.30-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.05.007.
Saleh, M., Zulkifli, N. and Muhamad, R., 2011. Looking for evidence of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in an emerging market. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, [e-journal] 3(2), pp.165-190. https://doi.org/10.1108/17574321111169849.
Servaes, H. and Tamayo, A., 2013. The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: the role of customer awareness. Management Science, [e-journal] 59(5), pp.1045-1061. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630.
Supriyati and Tjahjadi, B., 2017. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Stakeholder Theory vs Good Management Theory. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(16), pp.235-244.
Testa, M., D’Amato, A., 2017. Corporate environmental responsibility and financial performance: does bidirectional causality work? Empirical evidence from the manufacturing industry. Social Responsibility Journal, [e-journal] 13(2), pp.221-234. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2016-0031.
Tsai, M.-T., Chuang, L.-M., Chao, S.-T. and Chang, H.-P., 2012. The effects assessment of firm environmental strategy and customer environmental conscious on green product development. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, [e-journal] 184(7), pp.4435-4447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2275-4.
Visser, W., 2009. Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries. In: A. Crane, D. Matten, A. McWilliams, J. Moon, and D.S. Siegel, eds. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. King‘s Lynn, Norfolk: Oxford University Press.
Walden, W.D. and Schwartz, B.N., 1997. Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(2), pp.125-154.
Wang, H. and Qian, C., 2011. Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, [e-journal] 54(6), pp.1159-1181. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0548.
Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R. and George, G., 2016. Corporate Social Responsibility: An Overview And New Research Direction Thematic Issue on Corporate Social Responsibility [From The Editors]. Academy of Management Journal, [e-journal] 56(2), pp.534-544. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.5001.
Wang, Z. and Sarkis, J., 2017. Corporate Social Responsibilities Governance Outcome and Financial Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, [e-journal] 162, pp.1607-1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.142.
Weber, M., 2008. The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, [e-journal] 26, pp.247-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.01.006.
Zhang, J., 2016. Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Financial Performance of Listed Manufacturing Firms in Germany?. University of Twente.
Authors
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.