Innovative Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation for Quality-of-Life Improvement: Experience from Cooperation Between Centres in Hungary and Slovakia

Peter Takáč (1), Krisztina Sándor (2), Anna Kubincová (3), Michal Tkáč (4), Gábor Fazekas (5)
(1) Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice";} and L. Pasteur University Hospital Košice, Slovakia,
(2) National Institute for Locomotor Diseases and Disabilities/National Institute for Medical Rehabilitation (OMINT/OORI), Hungary,
(3) Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice and L. Pasteur University Hospital Košice, Slovakia,
(4) University of Economics in Bratislava with seat in Košice, Slovakia,
(5) National Institute for Locomotor Diseases and Disabilities/National Institute for Medical Rehabilitation (OORI), Budapest and University of Szeged, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Szeged, Hungary

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to analyse the experience of two participating workplaces in introducing innovative robotically assisted rehabilitation in clinical practice and influencing the quality of life of patients.


Methodology/Approach: Online questionnaires were distributed to the rehabilitation staff of the two workplaces, and the Functional Independence Measurement (FIM) and Barthel index were measured before the start of rehabilitation and after the completion of rehabilitation. Results showed that the robots were highly effective, easy to use, and significant in achieving the therapeutic goal. Rehabilitation specialists who already have experience in robotic rehabilitation perceive the expected impacts with a higher efficiency of 10% compared to those who do not have experience with robot-assisted therapy. In a selected group of patients, a significant positive effect on the functional status of patients and their quality of life was demonstrated.


Research Limitation/Implication: Robotically assisted rehabilitation has a positive effect on functional status and quality of life, motivating rehabilitation workers even when treating patients with severe disabilities.


Originality/Value of paper: Data collected are beneficial for health, educational, and social fields.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Bessler, J., Prange-Lasonder, G.B., Schaake, L., Saenz, J.F., Bidard, C., Fassi, I., Valori, M., Lassen, A.B. and Buurke, J.H., 2021. Safety assessment of rehabilitation robots: a review identifying safety skills and current knowledge gaps. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, [e-journal] 8, p.602878. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.602878.

Fatema, Z., Sigamani, A.G.V. and Manuel, D., 2022. ‘Quality of life at 90 days after stroke and its correlation to activities of daily living’: A prospective cohort study. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, [e-journal] 31(11), p.106806. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106806.

Fernandes, S., Almeida, A.S., Peças, D., Ferreira, N. and Roldão, L., 2022. Rehabilitation workforce challenges to implement person-centered care. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [e-journal] 19(6), p.3199. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063199.

Fong, J., Crocher, V., Klaic, M., Davies, K., Rowse, A., Sutton, E., Tan, Y., Oetomo, D., Brock, K. and Galea, M.P., 2022. Promoting clinical best practice in a user-centred design study of an upper limb rehabilitation robot. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, [e-journal] 17(5), pp.531-538. DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1785567.

Laut, J., Porfiri, M. and Raghavan, P., 2016. The Present and Future of Robotic Technology in Rehabilitation. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, [e-journal] 4(4), pp.312-319. DOI: 10.1007/s40141-016-0139-0.

Li, L., Tyson, S. and Weightman, A., 2021. Professionals’ views and experiences of using rehabilitation robotics with stroke survivors: a mixed methods survey. Frontiers in Medical Technology, [e-journal] 3, p.780090. DOI: 10.3389/fmedt.2021.780090.

Mcleod, S., 2008. Likert scale definition, examples and analysis. Simply Psycgology, [online] Updated 8 March 2023. Available at: <https://www.simplypsychology.org/likert-scale.html> [Accessed 28 March 2023].

Mehrholz, J., Thomas, S., Kugler, J., Pohl, M. and Elsner, B., 2020. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. [online] Available at: <https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006185.pub5/full> [Accessed 28 March 2023].

Tavares, E., Coelho, J., Rogado, P., Correia, R., Castro, C. and Fernandes, J.B., 2022. Barriers to gait training among stroke survivors: an integrative review. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, [e-journal] 7(4), p.85. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk7040085.

Van Exel, N.J.A., Scholte op Reimer, W.J.M. and Koopmanschap, M.A., 2004. Assessment of post-stroke quality of life in cost-effectiveness studies: The usefulness of the Barthel Index and the EuroQoL-5D. Quality of Life Research, [e-journal] 13(2), pp.427-433. DOI: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018496.02968.50.

Veerbeek, J.M., Langbroek-Amersfoort, A.C., Van Wegen, E.E.H., Meskers, C.G.M. and Kwakkel, G., 2017. Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy for the Upper Limb After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, [e-journal] 31(2), pp.107-121. DOI: 10.1177/1545968316666957.

Wafa, H.A., Wolfe, C.D.A., Emmett, E., Roth, G.A., Johnson, C.O. and Wang, Y., 2020. Burden of stroke in europe: thirty-year projections of incidence, prevalence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years. Stroke, [e-journal] 51(8), pp.2418-2427. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029606.

Authors

Peter Takáč
peter.takac@upjs.sk (Primary Contact)
Krisztina Sándor
Anna Kubincová
Michal Tkáč
Gábor Fazekas
Author Biographies

Peter Takáč, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice";} and L. Pasteur University Hospital Košice

Department of Physiatry, Balneology and Medical Rehabilitation

Medical Faculty

Pavol Jozef Šafárik University and L. Pasteur University Hospital Košice

Slovakia

Krisztina Sándor, National Institute for Locomotor Diseases and Disabilities/National Institute for Medical Rehabilitation (OMINT/OORI)

National Institute for Locomotor Diseases and Disabilities/National Institute for Medical Rehabilitation (OMINT/OORI)

Budapest

Hungary

Anna Kubincová, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice and L. Pasteur University Hospital Košice

Department of Physiatry, Balneology and Medical Rehabilitation

Medical Faculty

Pavol Jozef Šafárik University and L. Pasteur University Hospital Košice

Slovakia

Michal Tkáč, University of Economics in Bratislava with seat in Košice

Faculty of Business Economy

University of Economics in Bratislava with seat in Košice

Slovakia

Gábor Fazekas, National Institute for Locomotor Diseases and Disabilities/National Institute for Medical Rehabilitation (OORI), Budapest and University of Szeged, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Szeged

National Institute for Locomotor Diseases and Disabilities/National Institute for Medical Rehabilitation (OMINT/OORI)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine

University of Szeged

Budapest

Hungary

Takáč, P., Sándor, K., Kubincová, A., Tkáč, M., & Fazekas, G. (2023). Innovative Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation for Quality-of-Life Improvement: Experience from Cooperation Between Centres in Hungary and Slovakia. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 27(1), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v27i1.1810

Article Details

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

‘Science of the City’: Towards a Higher Quality of Urban Life

Luigi Fusco Girard, Oto Hudec, Karima Kourt, Peter Nijkamp
Abstract View : 1864
Download :755