REMONA Model for Improving Quality of Corporate Informatics Performance Management: How to Cut Cots in Corporate Informatics

Milos Maryska, Petr Doucek

Abstract


Purpose: This paper studies the introduction or increasing of the ability to manage performance in an organization environment. The paper’s objective is to facilitate the solution of this problem. Its main goal, meanwhile, is to present the REMONA model and the results of its implementation and to spark professional discussion of the concept behind it.

Methodology/Approach: A model will be created to demonstrate the use of the created artifacts within two sub-areas in the environment of two international companies (a consulting firm and an automotive firm) while using the proposed methodology. The model and the methodology will be evaluated for their creation in an organization environment and communication in the entire area.

Findings: Pilot implementation was performed at two companies. It was proven that the proposed REMONA model makes it easier to process and analyze certain financial tasks that are presently considered crucial. The implementation of REMONA model will mainly find use in service or manufacturing companies.

Research Limitation/implication: The REMONA model has only been tested and verified in IT services within service-oriented companies and the automotive industry.

Originality/Value of paper: The paper is valuable for IT managers, and especially CIOs – Chief Information Officers – and project managers. They can find here inspiration for cost allocation, planning, and profitability management in IT services. The article also briefly presents practical experiences with the model’s implementation at two international corporations.

Keywords


corporate performance management; business informatics; economics efficiency; reference model; business intelligence; data quality

Full Text:

PDF

References


Advanced Performance Institute, 2016. Performance Management - what is it?. [online] Available at: < http://www.ap-institute.com/what-is-performance-management.aspx > [Accessed 31 May 2016].

Antonová, B. and Zapletalová, Š., 2014. The economic crisis and company management: influences and consequences. E+M, Ekonomie a Management, [e-journal] XVII(1), pp.4-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2014-1-001.

Balocco, R., Ciappini, A. and Rangone, A., 2013. ICT Governance: A Reference Framework. Information Systems Management, [e-journal] 30(2), pp.150-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2013.773808.

Bjerge, B., Clark, N., Fisker, P. and Raju, E., 2016. Technology and Information Sharing in Disaster Relief. PLOS ONE, [e-journal] 11(9), e0161783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161783.

Chrissis, M.B., Konrad, M. and Shrum, S., 2011. CMMI for Development: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley Professional.

Cokins, G., 2009. Performance Management: Integrating Strategy Execution, Methodologies, Risk, and Analytics. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.

Dimon, R., 2013. Enterprise Performance Management Done Right: An Operating System for Your Organization. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.

Doucek, P. Maryska, M. and Nedomova, L., 2016. The Reference Model for Cost Allocation Optimization and Planning for Business Informatics Management. In: A.M. Tjoa, L.D. Xu, M. Raffai and N. Novak, ed. 2016. Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Information Systems. Vienna, 13-14. December 2016. Switzerland: SpringerLink. pp.253-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49944-4_19.

Doucek, P., Maryska, M. and Nedomova, L., 2013. Informační management v informační společnosti. Praha: Professional Publishing.

Eckerson, W.W., 2010. Performance Dashboards: Measuring, Monitoring, and Managing Your Business. New York: Wiley.

Ernst & Young, 2015. Technology risk: are your IT controls an asset or a liability? [Available at: < http://www.ey.com/PK/en/Issues/Operational-effectiveness/IT-effectiveness/Global-Risk_Risk-Issues_Technology-Risk > [Accessed 31 May 2016].

Grembergen, W.V. and Haes, S.D., 2001. Measuring and Improving Information Technology Governance through the Balanced Scorecard. Message posted at: < https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251848095_Measuring_and_Improving_Information_Technology_Governance_through_the_Balanced_Scorecard > [Accessed 31 May 2016].

Isaca, 2012a. COBIT 5 for Information Security. Rolling Meadows, IL: Isaca.

Isaca, 2012b. COBIT 5 Framework. Rolling Meadows, IL: Isaca.

ITIL, 2001. ITIL: Service Strategy 1. London: TSO.

Keating, M., 2016. Beyond Labor Arbitrage to Achieving Business Value from IT08-ProfIT. [online] Freeborders. Available at: < http://www.freeborders.com.cn/wp-content/uploads/08-ProfIT.pdf > [Accessed 31 May 2016].

Maryska, M. 2014. Referenční model optimalizace nákladové alokace a plánování pro řízení podnikové informatiky. Habilitation Thesis. University of Economics in Prague, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics.

Menken, I., 2011. Itil® Foundation Complete Certification Kit - Study Book and eLearning Program. Brisbane: Emereo Pty Ltd.

MNsure, 2012. Cost Allocation Methodology = Information Technology cost Items. [pdf] State of Minnesota. Available at: < https://www.mnsure.org/assets/Grant-CostAllocation-2012-08_tcm34-182321.pdf > [Accessed 31 May 2016].

Novotny, O. 2003. Aplikace metrik v referenčním modelu řízení podnikové informatiky. Ph. D. University of Economics in Prague, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics.

Parmenter, D., 2010. Key Performance Indicators (KPI): Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs. 2nd ed. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. and Chatterjee, S., 2007. A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, [e-journal] 24(3), pp.45-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302.

Popesko, B., 2010. Metodika aplikace kalkulace Activity-Based Costing v průmyslových firmách. E+M, Ekonomie a Management, 1, pp.103-114.

Potter, K., 2009. Key Issues for Cost Optimization. [online] Gartner. Available at: < https://www.gartner.com/doc/923830/key-issues-cost-optimization > [Accessed 31 May 2016].

Solodovnikova, D. and Kozmina, N., 2011. Determining Preferences from Semantic Metadata in OLAP Reporting Tool. In: J. Grabis and M. Kirikova, ed. Local Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR'11). Riga, Latvia, 6-8 October 2011. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Tavadyan, A.A., 2012. Internvals of Uncertainity of Economy. Moscow: Nauka.

Varian, H.R., Farrell, J. and Shapiro, C., 2005. The Economics of Information Technology: An Introduction. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ventana Research, 2012. Smarter IT Cost Allocation. [online] Ventana Research. Available at: < http://www.ventanaresearch.com/blog/commentblog.aspx? id=3133 > [Accessed 31 May 2016].

Vorisek, J. and Pour, J., 2012. Management podnikové informatiky. Praha: Professional Publishing.

Vorisek, J. and Pour, J., 2015. Model for Management of Business Informatics. In: Current Issues of Science and Research in the Global World. Wien, 27-28 May 2014. London: Taylor & Francis Group.

Vorisek, J., Pour, J. and Buchalcevova, A. 2015. Management of Business Informatics Model – Principles and Practices. E+M, Ekonomie a Management, [e-journal] 18(3), pp.160-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2015-3-014.

Wade, D. and Recardo, R., 2001. Corporate Performance Management. Boston: Taylor & Francis.

Wagner, J., 2009. Měření výkonnosti. Praha: Grada Publishing.

Wibral, M., Pampu, N., Priesemann, V., Siebenhühner, F., Seiwert, H., Lindner, M., Lizier, J.T. and Vicente, R., 2013. Measuring Information-Transfer Delays. PLOS ONE, [e-journal] 8(2), e55809. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0055809.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/qip.v21i3.939

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Milos Maryska, Petr Doucek

ISSN 1335-1745 (print)
ISSN 1338-984X (online)
CCBY crossref cope
Covered, abstracted, indexed in:
 
Clarivate Analytics Emerging Sources Citation Index; Scopus; Google Scholar; IDEAS; EconPapers; RePEc; Cabells' Directories; Google Scholar