Product Innovations toward a Circular Economy: A Survey-Based Analysis of Slovak Manufacturing Firms
Abstract
Purpose: This paper investigates the adoption of product eco-innovations among Slovak manufacturing firms in the context of circular economy (CE) transition and assesses their relationship with industry sectors and company size.
Methodology/Approach: A quantitative survey of 101 Slovak manufacturing firms was analysed using chi-square tests, Cramér’s V, and Spearman correlations to explore links between eco-innovation adoption and firm characteristics.
Findings: Firm size significantly relates to general product eco-innovation, but not to five of six specific eco-innovations (health impact, energy use, lifespan, pollution, recycling). Only easier maintenance or upgrading shows this link. No significant link exists between industry sectors and product eco-innovation, although sectoral differences are evident in specific eco-innovations. Specific eco-innovations, such as those that reduce pollution and increase product longevity, often co-occur.
Research Limitation/Implication: The main limitation lies in the national scope and single-method approach.
Originality/Value of paper: This paper adds to the limited empirical research on product eco-innovation in Central Europe by offering novel insights into sectoral and size-based patterns aligned with CE goals.
Purpose: This paper investigates the adoption of product eco-innovations among Slovak manufacturing firms in the context of circular economy (CE) transition and assesses their relationship with industry sectors and company size.
Methodology/Approach: A quantitative survey of 101 Slovak manufacturing firms was analysed using chi-square tests, Cramér’s V, and Spearman correlations to explore links between eco-innovation adoption and firm characteristics.
Findings: Firm size significantly relates to general product eco-innovation, but not to five of six specific eco-innovations (health impact, energy use, lifespan, pollution, recycling). Only easier maintenance or upgrading shows this link. No significant link exists between industry sectors and product eco-innovation, although sectoral differences are evident in specific eco-innovations. Specific eco-innovations, such as those that reduce pollution and increase product longevity, often co-occur.
Research Limitation/Implication: The main limitation lies in the national scope and single-method approach.
Originality/Value of paper: This paper adds to the limited empirical research on product eco-innovation in Central Europe by offering novel insights into sectoral and size-based patterns aligned with CE goals.
Full text article
References
Agresti, A., 2007. An introduction to categorical data analysis, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978 0 471 22618 5.
Akoglu, H., 2018 User’s guide to correlation coefficients, Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(3), pp. 91–93. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001.
Alos-Simo, L., Verdu-Jover, A.J. and Gomez-Gras, J.M., 2020. Does activity sector matter for the relationship between eco-innovation and performance? Implications for cleaner production, Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, p. 121544. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121544.
Bal-Domańska, B., Stańczyk, E. and Szewczyk, M., 2025. Empirical Evidence on Pro-Environmental Activities of Companies in Times of Energy Transformation: A Case Study of Poland, Energies, 18(11), p. 2703. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/en18112703.
Biscione, A. et al., 2022. Four types of eco-innovation for Baltic firms, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), pp. 196–212. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2021.1889393.
Bocken, N.M.P. et al., 2016. Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy, Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), pp. 308–320. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124.
Cainelli, G., D’Amato, A. and Mazzanti, M., 2020. Resource efficient eco-innovations for a circular economy: Evidence from EU firms, Research Policy, 49(1), pp. 103827–103827. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103827.
Carfora, A. et al., 2022. Do determinants of eco-innovations vary? An investigation of innovative SMEs through a quantile regression approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 370, p. 133475. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133475.
Confente, I., Scarpi, D. and Russo, I., 2020. Marketing a new generation of bio-plastics products for a circular economy: The role of green self-identity, self-congruity, and perceived value, Journal of Business Research, 112, pp. 431–439. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.030.
Córcoles, D. and Triguero, Á., 2025. The influence of eco-innovation on high-performing firms: The dynamics of productivity in the context of circular economy, European Research on Management and Business Economics, 31(2), p. 100275. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2025.100275.
Dangelico, R.M. and Pujari, D., 2010. Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability, Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), pp. 471–486. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0.
Domaracká, L. et al., 2025. Comparative Analysis of Eco-Innovation Index—A Case Study of Slovakia, Czech Republic, and Poland, Sustainability, 17(13), p. 5797. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135797.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2025. Circular economy introduction. Available at: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/circular-economy-introduction/overview (Accessed: 18 July 2025).
European Commission, 2001. Green paper on integrated product policy. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a1d1c043-cf9d-4bd0-a2e9-efd2ffac7288/language-lt (Accessed: 1 July 2025).
European Commission, 2012. Evaluation of the Ecodesign Directive (2009/125/EC). Kent, UK. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/379645c0-eeb7-40eb-adc7-e5a4a502c869 (Accessed: 1 July 2025).
Fichter, K. and Clausen, J., 2021. Diffusion of environmental innovations: Sector differences and explanation range of factors, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 38, pp. 34–51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.10.005.
Field, A., 2024. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 6th ed. London: SAGE Publications.
Fleith de Medeiros, J. et al., 2022. Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: An updated review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 345, p. 131039. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131039.
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C. and Ulgiati, S., 2016. A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems, Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, pp. 11–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007.
Ghosh, D., Shah, J. and Swami, S., 2020. Product greening and pricing strategies of firms under green sensitive consumer demand and environmental regulations, Annals of Operations Research, 290(1), pp. 491–520. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2903-2.
Horbach, J., 2008. Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources, Research Policy, 37(1), pp. 163–173. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006.
Horbach, J., Rammer, C. and Rennings, K., 2012. Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact — The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull, Ecological Economics, 78, pp. 112–122. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005.
Korcsmaros, E. et al., 2024. Innovation Activity of Slovak SMEs Operating in the ICT Sector, Marketing and Management of Innovations, 15(4), pp. 72–84. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2024.4-06.
Loučanová, E., Olšiaková, M. and Štofková, J., 2022. Ecological Innovation: Sustainable Development in Slovakia, Sustainability, 14(19), p. 12620. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912620.
Maldonado-Guzmán, G., Garza-Reyes, J.A. and Pinzón-Castro, Y., 2020. Eco-innovation and the circular economy in the automotive industry, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(2), pp. 621–635. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2020-0317.
Maman, A., Dias, J.G. and Bassi, F., 2024. Sustainability-oriented management in the SMEs. A multilevel analysis in the European Union, Journal of Environmental Management, 365, p. 121559. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121559.
Marin, G. and Lotti, F., 2017. Productivity effects of eco-innovations using data on eco-patents, Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(1), pp. 125–148. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtw014.
Maxwell, D. and van der Vorst, R., 2003. Developing sustainable products and services, Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(8), pp. 883–895. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00164-6.
McHugh, M.L., 2013. The Chi-square test of independence, Biochemia Medica, 23(2), pp. 143–149. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.018.
Ormazabal, M. et al., 2018. Circular Economy in Spanish SMEs: Challenges and opportunities, Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, pp. 157–167. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.031.
Pallant, J., 2020. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. 7th ed. London: Routledge.
Pavitt, K., 1984. Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy, 13(6), pp. 343–373. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0.
Perotti, F.A. et al., 2025. Bridging Innovation Management and Circular Economy: An Empirical Assessment of Green Innovation and Open Innovation, Creativity and Innovation Management, 34(2), pp. 466–485. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12647.
Prieto-Sandoval, V., Jaca, C. and Ormazabal, M., 2018. Towards a consensus on the circular economy, Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, pp. 605–615. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224.
Przychodzen, J. and Przychodzen, W., 2015. Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance – evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary, Journal of Cleaner Production, 90, pp. 253–263. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.034.
Reinard, J., 2006. Communication Research Statistics. SAGE Publications, Inc. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983693.
Rodríguez-Rebés, L. et al., 2024. The use and drivers of organisational eco-innovation in European SMEs, Research in International Business and Finance, 70, p. 102297. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102297.
SOVA digital, M., 2017) Vyhodnotenie prieskumu Industry 4.0 v SR I PlasticPortal.sk. Available at: https://www.plasticportal.sk/clanky/vyhodnotenie-prieskumu-industry-40-v-sr (Accessed: 17 July 2025).
Suchek, N. et al., 2021. Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review, Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), pp. 3686–3702. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2834.
Urbaníková, M. et al., 2020. Analysis of Innovation Activities of Slovak Small and Medium-Sized Family Businesses, Administrative Sciences, 10(4), p. 80. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040080.
Vicianová, J.H. et al., 2017. Developing eco-innovation in business practice in Slovakia, Journal of Business Economics and Management [Preprint]. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3846/16111699.2017.1381146 (Accessed: 30 June 2025).
Vinczeová, M., Klement, L. and Klementová, V., 2024. Factors Determining Business Eco-Innovation Activities: A Case of Slovak SMEs, in N. Tsounis and A. Vlachvei (eds) Applied Economic Research and Trends. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 907–922. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49105-4_51.
Vokoun, M. and Jílková, J., 2020. Eco-Innovation Activities in the Czech Economy 2008–2014: Impact of the Eco-Innovative Approach to the Profit Stream and Differences in Urban and Rural Enterprises, Economies, 8(1), p. 3. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies8010003.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Lenka Leščinská, Juraj Šebo, Anna Badidová
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.