Consumer Awareness and Willingness to Pay for Eco-Labeled Products: Evidence from Slovakia
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigates the awareness and understanding of eco-labels among Slovak consumers, alongside their willingness to pay a premium for environmentally friendly products.
Methodology/Approach: For this study, a custom questionnaire was designed. The survey was conducted online using Google Forms from December 2020 to the end of February 2021, The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U test to test differences among respondent groups.
Findings: Results reveal that only a minority of respondents correctly understand the meaning of the analyzed eco-labels, with higher awareness for labels associated with direct economic benefits, such as energy savings. Statistical analysis highlights significant differences in awareness and willingness to pay based on age and income. Most respondents express a preference for receiving eco-label information through in-store displays and banners.
Research Limitation/Implication: Sample is restricted to limited size and structure that was reachable during COVID-19 pandemic.
Originality/Value of paper: There are few studies that examine eco-labeling of products in relation to demographic data of respondents, but to our knowledge none from Slovakia. In addition, this study uniquely includes identifying respondents' preferences when obtaining information about eco-labels on products.
Full text article
References
Bhaskaran, S., Polonsky, M., Cary, J. and Fernandez, S., 2006. Environmentally sustainable food production and marketing. British Food Journal, 108(8), pp.677–690. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700610682355.
Bjørner, T.B., Hansen, L.G. and Russell, C.S., 2004. Environmental labeling and consumers’ choice—an empirical analysis of the effect of the Nordic Swan. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47(3), pp.411–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2003.06.002.
Bui, M.H., 2005. Environmental marketing: a model of consumer behavior. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Marketing Educators. [online] Available at: <https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:167546912>.
D’Souza, C., Taghian, M. and Lamb, P., 2006. An empirical study on the influence of environmental labels on consumers. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(2), pp.162–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280610661697.
Ecolabelling Sweden, 2019. Strategies for sustainable business development. [The report] Stockholm: Ecolabelig Sweden. p.72. Available at: <https://www.svanen.se/49e820/siteassets/rapporter--undersokningar/the-report/rapport_a4_svanen_190628.pdf>.
Emberger-Klein, A. and Menrad, K., 2018. The effect of information provision on supermarket consumers’ use of and preferences for carbon labels in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, pp.253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.105.
Gavora, P., 2007. Sprievodca metodológiou kvalitatívneho výskumu. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo UK.
Gertz, R., 2005. Eco-labelling—a case for deregulation? Law, Probability and Risk, 4(3), pp.127–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgi010.
Global Ecolabelling Network, 2024. What is Ecolabelling? [online] Global Ecolabelling Network. Available at: <https://globalecolabelling.net/about/what-is-ecolabelling/> [Accessed 14 December 2024].
Golubevaitė, L., 2008. Eco-labelling as a marketing tool for green consumerism. Global Academic Society Journal, 1(3), pp.25–36.
Hyandye, C., Mandara, C.G. and Mbowe, F., 2012. Environmental Impacts of Product Labelling on Consumers Shopping and Wastes Disposal Behaviour in Dodoma Urban, Tanzania. (2).
Jahn, G., Schramm, M. and Spiller, A., 2005. The Reliability of Certification: Quality Labels as a Consumer Policy Tool. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(1), pp.53–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-004-7298-6.
Kikuchi-Uehara, E., Nakatani, J. and Hirao, M., 2016. Analysis of factors influencing consumers’ proenvironmental behavior based on life cycle thinking. Part II: trust model of environmental information. Journal of Cleaner Production, 125, pp.216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.011.
Lefébure, A. and Muňoz, R.R., 2011. Communicating to consumers in Sweden with eco-labels -Is the message getting through? Master thesis. Umeå School of Business.
Loureiro, M.L., Mccluskey, J.J. and Mittelhammer, R.C., 2002. Will Consumers Pay a Premium for Eco‐labeled Apples? Journal of Consumer Affairs, 36(2), pp.203–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2002.tb00430.x.
Mkhize, S. and Ellis, D., 2020. Creativity in marketing communication to overcome barriers to organic produce purchases: The case of a developing nation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, p.118415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118415.
Modak, P., 2017. Environmental Management towards Sustainability. [online] Boca Raton: CRC Press. Available at: <https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315156118>.
Mufidah, I., Jiang, B.C., Lin, S.-C., Chin, J., Rachmaniati, Y.P. and Persada, S.F., 2018. Understanding the Consumers’ Behavior Intention in Using Green Ecolabel Product through Pro-Environmental Planned Behavior Model in Developing and Developed Regions: Lessons Learned from Taiwan and Indonesia. Sustainability, 10(5), p.1423. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051423.
Nordic Council of Ministers´ Office in Estonia, 2024. Nordic Ecolabel. [online] norden.ee. Available at: <https://www.norden.ee/en/green-growth/eco-label> [Accessed 14 November 2024].
OECD, 2016. Environmental Labelling and Information Schemes. [online] Available at: <https://web-archive.oecd.org/2017-02-14/413679-labelling-and-information-schemes.htm> [Accessed 14 December 2024].
Prieto-Sandoval, V., Alfaro, J.A., Mejía-Villa, A. and Ormazabal, M., 2016. ECO-labels as a multidimensional research topic: Trends and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, pp.806–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.167.
Rusko, M., 2012. Environmentálne orientované značky a environmentálne označovanie typu I, II, a III. In: Zborník z konferencie so zahraničnou účasťou: Sustainability - Environment - Safety ´2012. [online] pp.246–255. Available at: <https://www.sszp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012_conference_SES_p-246_Rusko.pdf>.
Rusko, M. and Korauš, A., 2004. Ecolabelling, LCA, Ecodesign and Green Marketing. Životné prostredie, 38(4), pp.178–181.
SAŽP, 2017. Environmentálne označovanie produktov. [online] SAŽP. Available at: <https://www.sazp.sk/zivotne-prostredie/environmentalne-manazerstvo/environmentalne-oznacovanie-produktov> [Accessed 14 December 2024].
Song, L., Lim, Y., Chang, P., Guo, Y., Zhang, M., Wang, X., Yu, X., Lehto, M.R. and Cai, H., 2019. Ecolabel’s role in informing sustainable consumption: A naturalistic decision making study using eye tracking glasses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, pp.685–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.283.
Stø, E., Strandbakken, P., Scheer, D. and Rubik, F., 2005. Background: theoretical contributions, eco-labels and environmental policy. In: The Future of Eco-labelling. Routledge.
Taufique, K.M.R., Siwar, C., Chamhuri, N. and Sarah, F.H., 2016. Integrating General Environmental Knowledge and Eco-Label Knowledge in Understanding Ecologically Conscious Consumer Behavior. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, pp.39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30090-9.
Taufique, K.M.R., Siwar, C., Talib, B., Sarah, F.H. and Chamhuri, N., 2014. Synthesis of Constructs for Modeling Consumers’ Understanding and Perception of Eco-Labels. Sustainability, 6(4), pp.2176–2200. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6042176.
Thøgersen, J., Haugaard, P. and Olesen, A., 2010. Consumer responses to ecolabels. European Journal of Marketing, 44(11/12), pp.1787–1810. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011079882.
Tomšik, R., 2017. Kvantitatívny výskum v pedagogických vedách : Úvod do metodológie a štatistického spracovania. Nitra: PEDAGOGICKÁ FAKULTA, UNIVERZITA KONŠTANTÍNA FILOZOFA V NITRE.
Witek, L., 2017. Sustainable Consumption: Eco-labelling and its impact on consumer behavior - evidence from a study on Polish consumer. [online] (142/2017). Available at: <https://ideas.repec.org/p/pes/wpaper/2017no142.html>.
Yau, Y., 2012. Eco‐labels and willingness‐to‐pay: a Hong Kong study. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 1(3), pp.277–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/20466091211287146.
Ziółkowski, B., 2020. Environmental labels and declarations in public policies of Poland. Polityka i Społeczeństwo, 18(03), pp.5–15.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Juraj Šebo, Lívia Gondová, Anna Badidová
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.