Digital Technology Investment, Educational Technology, and Innovation Capacity in Egyptian Entrepreneurial Universities: An Integrated IPO Governance Framework with Quality Assurance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v30i2.2351

Keywords:

digital technology investment, educational technology, entrepreneurial university, innovation capacity, quality assurance

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates associations between Digital Technology Investment (DTI), Educational Technology (EdTech), Quality Assurance (QA), Innovation Capacity (IC), and Entrepreneurial University Characteristics (EUC) across twelve Egyptian universities within an integrated Input-Process-Output (IPO) governance framework.

Methodology/Approach: A cross-sectional survey used PLS-SEM (SmartPLS 4) with 5,000-subsample bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) bootstrapping.

Findings: DTI was positively associated with IC (β = 0.421) and EUC (β = 0.305). EdTech partially mediated both associations (VAF = 41%; 38%), confirming pedagogical embedding as the value-generation mechanism. QA showed no moderation and a robust direct association with IC (β = 0.269, p < 0.001). IC predicted EUC (β = 0.547).

Research Limitation/Implication: The cross-sectional design precludes causal inference. Administrators should co-invest in EdTech alongside digital infrastructure and explore joint QA-digital governance structures.

Originality/Value of paper: This study offers the first integrated empirical test of a five-construct DTI-EdTech-IC-EUC governance chain with QA in a dual role, deriving a three-tier governance alignment model for emerging-economy higher education.

Author Biographies

  • Nihad ElHadidy, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport, Alexandria

    Department of Business Information Systems

    Arab Academy for Science

    Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT)

    Alexandria

    Egypt

  • Nevien Khourshed, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport, Alexandria

    Department of Marketing and International Business

    Arab Academy for Science

    Technology and Maritime Transport

    Alexandria

    Egypt

  • Iman Nassef, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport, Alexandria

    College of Computing and Information Technology

    Arab Academy for Science

    Technology and Maritime Transport

    Alexandria

    Egypt

  • Kesmat AbdelAziz, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport, Alexandria

    Arab Academy for Science and Technology and Maritime Transport

    Business Information Systems Department

    Heliopolis- Cairo

    Alexaandria

    Egypt

References

Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2024). The entrepreneurial university: Strategies, processes, and competing goals. Journal of Technology Transfer, 49(6), 1991–2034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10085-7

Aboagye, E., Anane, E., & Boateng, R. (2025). Digital pedagogy and adaptive learning in post-pandemic universities. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-14058-7

Akram, M., Khan, S., & Malik, A. (2025). Strategic digital technology investment and institutional agility. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 210, Article 123723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.123723

Alamri, M., Alshammari, R., & Al-Shehri, A. (2023). The digital paradox of higher education. Computers & Education, 199, Article 104706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104706

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Esposito, E. (2019). Exploration and exploitation in entrepreneurial universities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.024

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

Costa, J., Fernandes, C., & Neves, A. (2025). Entrepreneurial university ecosystems and regional innovation. Technovation, 132, Article 103012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103012

Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02

Etzkowitz, H. (2017). Innovation lodestar: The entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.026

Ghosh, P., Rahman, M., & Karim, S. (2024). Digital transformation investments and performance resilience in higher education. Information & Management, 61(3), Article 103672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103672

Guerrero, M., Heaton, S., & Urbano, D. (2021). Building universities’ intrapreneurial capabilities in the digital era. Technovation, 99, Article 102139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102139

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102

Harvey, L., & Williams, J. (2010). Fifteen years of quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538321003679457

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hussein, M., & El-Naggar, R. (2025). Quality assurance as an innovation catalyst. Quality in Higher Education, 31(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2025.1001234

Kezar, A. (2018). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Kim, H., Lim, D., & Park, S. (2024). Digital learning ecosystems and institutional innovation in higher education. Computers & Education, 200, Article 104728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104728

Klofsten, M., Fayolle, A., Guerrero, M., Mian, S., Urbano, D., & Wright, M. (2019). The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.004

Marquez, M., & Luna, P. (2022). Applying the input-process-output model in educational innovation research. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(7), 1950–1972. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2021-0113

Munoz, L. & Harb, A. (2024). Assurance of learning in the age of digital transformation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(4), 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2181234

Park, S. & Gupta, S. (2012). Handling endogenous regressors by joint estimation using copulas. Marketing Science, 31(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1120.0718

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2025). SmartPLS 4 [Computer software]. SmartPLS GmbH.

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of market research (pp. 587–632). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15

Shamsi, M. (2024). Digital transformation governance in MENA higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(2), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2023-0175

Stensaker, B. (2018). Quality in higher education: Towards a better understanding of an elusive concept. Quality in Higher Education, 24(3), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2018.1557987

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Teece, D. J. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and innovation strategy. Long Range Planning, 56(5), Article 102304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102304

Times Higher Education (2024). THE Impact Rankings 2024. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/rankings/impact/2024/overall

Vidicki, P., Vrgović, P., Stevanov, B. & Medić, N. (2023). Framework for measuring innovation performance in higher education institutions. Tehnički vjesnik, 30(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20220224092742

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Digital Technology Investment, Educational Technology, and Innovation Capacity in Egyptian Entrepreneurial Universities: An Integrated IPO Governance Framework with Quality Assurance. (2026). Quality Innovation Prosperity, 30(2), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v30i2.2351