Evaluation of Urban Processes on Health in Historic Urban Landscape Approach: Experimentation in the Metropolitan Area of Naples (Italy)

Paola Carone, Pasquale De Toro, Alfredo Franciosa

Abstract


Purpose: Experimentally apply the Health Impact Assessment (HIA) to the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) approach according to the socio-ecological model of the World Health Organisation (WHO), where health is defined as “a state of complete physical, mental and social wellbeing and not simply the absence of disease and illness” (1986).

Methodology/Approach: The methodology considers the application of HIA, a multi-criteria evaluation approach capable of organising knowledge concerning the effects that projects, plans and programmes impose upon the wellbeing/health of an urban community. The case study is the metropolitan area of Naples and it considers a system of evaluation to support the drafting of the new instrument for the territorial governance: the Territorial Metropolitan Plan.

Findings: The research has developed through the identification of the “social determinants of health” and in the construction of a set of indicators implemented in a Geographic Information System (GIS), able to identify and to cartographically represent homogeneous landscape units of health.

Research Limitation/implication: The virtuous connection between health and conservation, proposed in the method applied to the case study, is completely experimental because there are no other similar experiences in literature.

Originality/Value of paper: The paper opens a prospect of research for the better understanding of spatial phenomena, creating new tools based on new technologies.

Keywords


Health Impact Assessment; Historic Urban Landscape; regeneration; wellbeing; metropolitan planning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acheson, D., 1998. Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in health: Report. London: The Stationery Office.

Barton, H. and Grant, M., 2006. A health map for the local human habitat. Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 126(6), pp.252-253.

Breeze, C. and Lock, K., 2001. Health impact assessment as part of Strategic Environmental Assessment. Copenhagen: WHO, Regional Office for Europe.

Burrough, P.A., 1986. Principles of geographical information system for land resources assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Censis, 2014. 48° rapporto sulla situazione sociale del paese. Roma: Censis.

Cerreta, M. and De Toro, P., 2012. Urbanization suitability maps: a dynamic spatial decision support system for sustainable land use. Earth System Dynamics, 3(2), pp.157-171.

Cole, B.L. and Fielding, J.E., 2007. Health Impact Assessment: a tool to help policy makers understand health beyond health care. Annual Review Public Health, 28, pp.393-412.

Daniel, T.C. and Vining, J., 1983. Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality. In: I. Altman, and J.F. Wohlwill, eds. 1983. Behavior and the Natural Environment, Human behavior and environment. New York: Plenum Press. pp.39-84.

Dakin, S.L., 2003. There’s more to landscape than meets the eye: towards inclusive landscape assessment in resource and environmental management. The Canadian Geographer, 47(2), pp.185-200.

D’Auria, A., 2009. Urban cultural tourism: creative approaches for heritage-based sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 12(2-4), pp.275-289.

D’Auria A. and Monti, B., 2013. The guardianship of the landscapes between identification and assessment: Ischia and its lost identity. In: Rezekne Higher Education Institution, Society, integration, education: utopias and dystopias in landscape and cultural mosaic: visions values vulnerability, Vol. IV. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Society, Integration, and Education Location. Udine, Italy, 27-28 June 2013. Rezekne, Latvia: PSRI of Rezekne Higher Education Institution. pp.165-176.

D’Auria, A. and Pugliese, S., 2013. The governance of UNESCO cultural landscapes between universal values and local identity: the case of Campania. In: Rezekne Higher Education Institution, Society, integration, education: utopias and dystopias in landscape and cultural mosaic: visions values vulnerability, Vol. V. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Society, Integration, and Education Location. Udine, Italy, 27-28June 2013, Rezekne, Latvia: PSRI of Rezekne Higher Education Institution. pp.189-200.

Figueira, J., Greco, S. and Ehrgott, M. eds., 2005. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Boston: Springer.

Forman, E.H., Saaty T.L., Selley M.A. and Waldron, R., 1983. Expert Choice. McLean: Decision Support Software.

Fusco Girard, L. and Nijkamp, P., 1997. Le valutazioni per lo sviluppo sostenibile della città e del territorio. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Fusco Girard, L. and De Toro P., 2007. Integrated spatial assessment: a multicriteria approach to sustainable development of cultural and environmental heritage in San Marco dei Cavoti, Italy. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 15(3), pp.281-299.

Fusco Girard, L., Cerreta, M., and De Toro, P., 2014. Integrated assessment for sustainable choices. Scienze Regionali, (13)1, pp.111-142.

Hancock, T., Labonte, R. and Edwards, R., 2000. Indicators that count! Measuring population health at the community level. Canadian Journal of Public Health, (90)1, pp.22-26.

Keene, R.L. and Raiffa, H., 1976. Decisions with multiple objectives. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Lillesand, T.M., Kiefer, R.W. and Chipman, J., 2015. Remote sensing and image processing. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Mohan, R., Spiby, J., Leonardi, G.S., Robini, A. and Jefferis, S., 2006. Sustainable waste management in the UK: the public health role. Public Health, 120, pp.908-914.

Munda, G., 1993. Multiple-criteria decision aid: some epistemological considerations. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2(1), pp.41-55.

Murgante, B., 2008. L’informazione geografica a supporto della pianificazione territoriale. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Quigley, R. and Taylor, L., 2003. Evaluation as key part of health impact assessment: the English experience. Bull WHO, 81(6), pp.415-419.

Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill.

Scott-Samuel, A., Birley, M. and Arden, K., 1998. The Merseyside guidelines for health impact. Liverpool: University of Liverpool.

Sen, A., 1999. Development and freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

United Nations, 1992. The Rio Declaration on environment and development. [online] Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme. Available at: [Accessed 01 August 2016].

UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), 2011. Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape. [pdf] Paris: UNESCO. Available at: [Accessed 01 August 2016].

WHO (World Health Organization), 1986. Ottawa Charter for health promotion: an International Conference on Health Promotion, the move towards a new public health. Ottawa, 17-21 November 1986. Ottawa, Canada: WHO.

WHO (World Health Organization), 1999. Health Impact Assessment: main concepts and suggested approach (Gothenburg consensus paper). Brussels: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

WHO (World Health Organization), 2011. Rio Political Declaration on social determinants of health. Rio de Janeiro: WHO.

WHO (World Health Organization), 2012. Health indicators of sustainable cities. Rio de Janeiro: WHO.

Wright J., Parry J. and Mathers J., 2005. Participation in health impact assessment: objectives, methods and core values. Bull World Health Organ, 83(1), pp.58-63.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/qip.v21i1.793

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Paola Carone, Pasquale De Toro, Alfredo Franciosa

ISSN 1335-1745 (print)
ISSN 1338-984X (online)
CCBY crossref cope
Indexed in:

SCOPUSEBSCO DOAJ Cabells
Econ papersIdeas RePecGoogle scholar