Corporate Social Responsibility and Inter-Organisational Trust in a B2B Context
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the paper to reveal the linkage between the customer perception of the supplier’s CSR and inter-organisational trust in a B2B context.
Methodology/Approach: The paper conceptualises the customer perception of CSR activities as a latent second-order factor composed of three dimensions: CSR towards environment and community; CSR towards employees; and CSR towards customers. Three-dimensional understanding of inter-organisational trust, is applied in this paper. A quantitative study was conducted.
Findings: As it was expected, the findings revealed that the customer perception of supplier’s CSR, namely CSR towards environment and community, towards employees and customers, generates inter-organisational trust that could be divided into competence trust, benevolence trust and integrity trust.
Research Limitation/implication: Seeing that the paper uses a sample from a single country, it has a limitation due to its restrictive generalisability (especially having in mind that the research was done in a low-trust societal context). Moreover, the paper does not incorporate the characteristics of organisations, and the future research could elaborate on the issues of how the perceived CSR and its impacts on inter-organisational trust vary depending on organisational financial performance, market share, and so forth.
Originality/Value of paper: The paper challenges the researchers and managers to move towards more sophisticated assessments concerning the way the customer perception of CSR affects inter-organisational trust in a B2B context, which might lead to improved organisational performance and sustainability.Full text article
References
Arrive, T.J., Feng, M., Yan, Y. and Chege, S.M., 2019. The involvement of telecommunication industry in the road to corporate sustainability and corporate social responsibility commitment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, [e-journal] 26(1), pp.152-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1667.
Asif, M., Searcy, C., Zutshi, A. and Fisscher, O.A., 2013. An integrated management systems approach to corporate social responsibility. Journal of cleaner production, [e-journal] 56, pp.7-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.034.
Bhattacharya, C.B., Korschun, D. and Sen, S., 2009. Strengthening stakeholder–company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, [e-journal] 85(2), pp.257-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9730-3.
Bhattacharya, C.B. and Sen, S., 2004. Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, [e-journal] 47(1), pp.9-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166284.
Boström, M., 2015. Between monitoring and trust: commitment to extended upstream responsibility. Journal of business ethics, [e-journal] 131(1), pp.239-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2277-6.
Campbell, J.L., 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, [e-journal] 32(3), pp.946-967. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684.
Carroll, A.B., 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, [e-journal] 34(4), pp.39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G.
Carroll, A.B., 2015. Corporate social responsibility. Organizational Dynamics, [e-journal] 44(2), pp.87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.02.002.
Carter, C.R. and Jennings, M.M., 2004. The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: a structural equation analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, [e-journal] 25(1), pp.145-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2004.tb00173.x.
Costa, R. and Menichini, T., 2013. A multidimensional approach for CSR assessment: The importance of the stakeholder perception. Expert Systems with Applications, [e-journal] 40(1), pp.150-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.028.
Dyllick, T. and Hockerts, K., 2002. Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, [e-journal] 11(2), pp.130-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323.
European Commission, 2011. A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. [pdf]. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: < http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_com(2011)0681_/com_com(2011)0681_en.pdf > [Accessed 24 November 2018].
Flammer, C., 2015. Corporate social responsibility and the allocation of procurement contracts: Evidence from a natural experiment. [online] Available at: < https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2548750 > [Accessed 24 November 2018].
Gallardo-Vázquez, D. and Sanchez-Hernandez, M.I., 2014. Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility for competitive success at a regional level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 72, pp.14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.051.
Guest, D.E., 2017. Human resource management and employee well‐being: Towards a new analytic framework. Human Resource Management Journal,
[e-journal] 27(1), pp.22-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12139.
Homburg, C., Stierl, M. and Bornemann, T., 2013. Corporate social responsibility in business-to-business markets: How organizational customers account for supplier corporate social responsibility engagement. Journal of Marketing, [e-journal] 77(6), pp.54-72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.12.0089.
Jamali, D., 2008. A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, [e-journal] 82(1), pp.213-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9572-4.
Kim, S., 2019. The process model of corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication: CSR communication and its relationship with consumers’ CSR knowledge, trust, and corporate reputation perception. Journal of Business Ethics, [e-journal] 154(4), pp.1143-1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3433-6.
Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Haanaes, K. and von Streng Velken, I., 2012. Sustainability nears a tipping point. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(2), pp.69-74.
KPMG, 2017. The road ahead. The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017. [pdf] KPMG International Cooperative. Available at < https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2017/10/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf> [Accessed 25 November 2018].
Kubenka, M. and Myskova, R., 2009. The B2B market: corporate social responsibility or corporate social responsiveness. WSEAS transactions on business and economics, 7(6), pp.320-330.
Lai, C.S., Chiu, C.J., Yang, C.F. and Pai, D.C., 2010. The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of business ethics, [e-journal] 95(3), pp. 457-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0433-1.
Lee, E.M., Park, S.Y. and Lee, H.J., 2013. Employee perception of CSR activities: Its antecedents and consequences. Journal of business research, [e-journal] 66(10), pp.1716-1724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.11.008.
Lee, Y.K., Lee, K.H. and Li, D.X., 2012. The impact of CSR on relationship quality and relationship outcomes: A perspective of service employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management, [e-journal] 31(3), pp.745-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.09.011.
Li, Y., Liu, B. and Huan, T.C.T., 2019. Renewal or not? Consumer response to a renewed corporate social responsibility strategy: Evidence from the coffee shop industry. Tourism Management, [e-journal] 72, pp.170-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.031.
Maignan, I. and Ferrell, O.C., 2004. Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing science, 32(1), pp.3-19.
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D., 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp.709-734.
McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V. and Kacmar, C., 2002. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information systems research, 13(3), pp.334-359.
McKnight, D.H., Lankton, N.K., Nicolaou, A. and Price, J., 2017. Distinguishing the effects of B2B information quality, system quality, and service outcome quality on trust and distrust. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, [e-journal] 26(2), pp.118-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.01.001.
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J., 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, [e-journal] 22(4), pp.853-886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247.
Moneva, J.M. and Hernández-Pajares, J., 2018. Corporate social responsibility performance and sustainability reporting in SMEs: an analysis of owner-managers' perceptions. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, [e-journal] 10(4), pp.405-420. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2018.095268.
Ng, T.W., Yam, K.C. and Aguinis, H., 2019. Employee perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Effects on pride, embeddedness, and turnover. Personnel Psychology, [e-journal] 72(1), pp.107-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12294.
Novick O’Keefe, L., 2017. CSR Grows in 2016 as Companies Embrace Employees’ Values. Huffpost, [online] 16 December 2017. Available at < https://www.huffingtonpost.com/linda-novick-okeefe/csr-grows-in-2016-as-comp_b_13657368.html > [Accessed 25 October 2019].
Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B.B., Murphy, P.E. and Gruber, V., 2014. Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Ethics, [e-journal] 124(1), pp.101-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1787-y.
Park, J., Lee, H. and Kim, C., 2014. Corporate social responsibilities, consumer trust and corporate reputation: South Korean consumers’ perspectives. Journal of Business Research, [e-journal] 67(3), pp.295-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.016.
Park, S.-Y. and Levy, S.E, 2014. Corporate social responsibility: perspectives of hotel frontline employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, [e-journal] 26(3), pp.332-348. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2013-0034.
Parmar, B.L., Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Purnell, L. and De Colle, S., 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. The academy of management annals, [e-journal] 3(1), pp.403-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.495581.
Pavlou, P.A., 2002. Institution-based trust in interorganizational exchange relationships: the role of online B2B marketplaces on trust formation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, [e-journal] 11(3-4), pp.215-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00017-3.
Peloza, J. and Shang, J., 2011. How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, [e-journal] 39(1), pp.117-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0213-6.
Post, J.E., Preston, L.E. and Sachs, S., 2002. Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, [e-journal] 45(1), pp. 6-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166151.
Pu?ėtaitė, R., Lämsä, A.M. and Novelskaitė, A., 2010. Building organizational trust in a low-trust societal context. Baltic Journal of Management, [e-journal] 5(2), pp.197-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465261011045124.
Rodrigo, P. and Arenas, D., 2008. Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, [e-journal] 83(2), pp.265-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9618-7.
Sen, S. and Bhattacharya, C.B., 2001. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of marketing Research, [e-journal] 38(2), pp.225-243. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838.
Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C.B. and Korschun, D., 2006. The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing science, [e-journal] 34(2), pp.158-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284978.
Singh, P., Sethuraman, K. and Lam, J., 2017. Impact of corporate social responsibility dimensions on firm value: Some evidence from Hong Kong and China. Sustainability, [e-journal] 9(9), pp.1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091532.
Turker, D., 2009a. Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of business ethics, [e-journal] 85(4), pp.411-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9780-6.
Turker, D., 2009b. How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business ethics, [e-journal] 89(189), pp.189-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9993-8.
Van Marrewijk, M., 2003. Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics,
[e-journal] 44(2-3), pp.95-105. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023331212247.
Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R. and George, G., 2016. Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions: Thematic issue on corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal. [e-journal] 59(2), pp.534-544. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.5001.
Zaheer, A. and Jared, H., 2006. Interorganizational trust. In: O. Shenkar and J. Reuer, eds. 2006. Handbook of Strategic Alliances. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp.169-197.
Authors
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.