Supplier Performance Management in Context of Size and Sector Characteristics of Enterprises

Martin Pech (1), Drahoš Vaněček (2)
(1) University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Czechia,
(2) University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Czechia

Abstract

Purpose: The paper deals with the differences of supplier performance management characteristics by different size of the enterprises and sectors of industry.

Methodology/Approach: The research is based on a questionnaire survey carried out in 2016-2019 in 366 enterprises. Four hypotheses were formulated, focused on supplier selection preferences, frequency of supply evaluation,  providing feedback to the suppliers about their performance and quality control. The results are analyzed by the tests of Chi-square statistics.

Findings: The results show that the enterprises differ in the criteria of the selection of the supplier, frequency of supply evaluation and providing feedback to the suppliers about their performance according to their sector industry. In terms of the size of the enterprises, differences were found only in the evaluation of suppliers and evaluation feedback. Enterprises did not differ in quality control of the deliveries.

Research Limitation/implication: The results show that quality is the most evaluated criterion in the selection of the suppliers. In the future, the importance of other environmental and Industry 4.0 criteria will grow. It is recommended combining supplier evaluation and reviews with the feedback to the suppliers to improve the performance of the suppliers.

Originality/Value of paper: The study compares the enterprises in terms of their size and industries in the area of supplier performance management characteristics. These criteria are often not mentioned nor compared in other publications.

References

Read More

Authors

Martin Pech
mpechac@ef.jcu.cz (Primary Contact)
Drahoš Vaněček
Pech, M., & Vaněček, D. (2020). Supplier Performance Management in Context of Size and Sector Characteristics of Enterprises. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 24(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v24i1.1407

Article Details

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Integrating 5S and Kaizen Principles for Enhanced Quality Improvement: A Pharmaceutical R&D Laboratory Case Study

Charalambos Binellas, Panos Chountalas, Anastasios Magoutas, Natalia Chatzifoti
Abstract View : 418
Download :126

Assessing Public Water Management Efficiency in North-western Mexico with a Two-stage Bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis Model

Martin Flegl, David Güemes-Castorena, Marien Morán-Valencia, Aldo I. Ramírez
Abstract View : 834
Download :135