Purpose: In this paper a new course design as a case study is presented. The course was given at bachelor level at Uppsala university, campus Gotland, within the division of quality technology. The purpose of the case is to give students an opportunity to practice acquired theoretical knowledge by offering them the opportunity to create an organization of their dreams, working in small groups.
Methodology/Approach: This paper builds upon a case study approach, combining a literature review, document studies over the performed course and evaluations over the course.
Findings: The case study shows that course design can be an important inspiration and a bridge between theory and practice for the students. Course design seems to support students’ learning processes according to evaluations of the course. Course design offers benefits of the collective learning, especially for distance students. It increases independence, understanding of one’s mission and accountability for it. Students are given the opportunity to practice the theoretical knowledge in their education in a creative and inspiring way. Still, there are further demands and challenges left of improvement in the course design.
Research Limitation/implication: The research limitation is that this study consists of only one course in Quality Technology.Originality/Value of paper: This study contributes to the discussion about learning at university level through a case study.
Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A., 1978. Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Boston: Addison & Wesley Pub, Co.
Boud, D. and Feletti, G., 1997. The challenge of Problem Based learning. London: Kogan Page.
Bruffee, K.A., 1993. Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Devedzic’, V. and Milenkovic, S.R., 2011. Teaching Agile Software Development: A Case Stud. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(2), pp.273-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TE.2010.205210.
Dillenbourg, P., 1999. Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, Advances in Learning and Instruction Series, New York: Elsevier Science.
Döös, M. and Wilhelmson, L., 2005. Kollektivt lärande. Om betydelsen av interaktion i handling och gemensam handlingsarena. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 10(3/4), pp.209-226.
Ellström, P.-E., 2011. Informal learning at work: Conditions, processes and logics, In: M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans and B. O’Connor, eds. 2011. eSAGE Handbook of Workplace Learning. London: Sage Publications. pp.105-119.
Foley, K.J. and Zahner, T., 2009. Creating and Managing the Sustainable Organization: The Stakeholder Way. Sydney: SAI Global.
Forslund, M., 2013. Organization and Management. Stockholm: Liber.
Gartner, 2015. 2016 Planning Guide Overview: Set the Pace With Agility, Design and Innovation. [online] Available at: < https://www.gartner.com/doc/3142818?refval=&pcp=mpe#a-14327807 > [Accessed 5 April 2018].
Goldstein, H., 1981. Social Learning and Change: A Cognitive Approach to Human Services. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Granberg, O. and Ohlsson, J. eds., 2016. Kollektivt lärande i arbetslivet. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Granberg, O. and Ohlsson, J., 2005. Kollektivt lärande i team. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 10(3/4), pp.227-243.
Granberg, O., 1996. Learning in organizations. Professional practitioners’ strategies for organizational change. Stockholm University.
Hallencreutz, J., 2012. Under the skin of change – meanings, models and management. Doctoral Thesis. Luleå, Sweden: Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Division of Quality Management.
Illeris, K. 2007. Learning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Kniberg, H. and Skrin, M., 2009. Kanban and Scrum making the most of both. [pdf] United State of America: C4Media Inc. Available at: < http://www.agileinnovation.eu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/KanbanAndScrum_MakingTheMostOfBoth.pdf > [Accessed 25 March 2019].
Kotter, J., 2012. Leading Change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Kotter, J., 2014. Accelerate: Building Strategic Agility for a Faster-moving World. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Lundgren, U., Säljö, R. and Liberg, C., 2014. Lärande, skola, bildning: grundbok för lärare. Stockholm: Natur & kultur.
Martin, R.C. and Micah, M., 2006. Agile principles, patterns, and practices in C#. Massachusetts: Prentice Hall.
Minsky, M., 1988. Society of Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Ohlsson, J., 1996. Kollektivt lärande: lärande i arbetsgrupper inom barnomsorgen = Collective learning: learning within workgroups at daycare and leisure centres for children. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.
Oxenswärdh, A., 2011. Responsibilities in School Improvement. Doctoral thesis. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Oxenswärdh, A., 2017. Student’s learning processes for sustainable knowledge. Millenium, 2(4), pp.33-43.
Schein, E.H., 1993. On dialogue, culture, and organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), pp.40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(93)90052-3.
Schön, D.A., 1995. Reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Melbourne: Arena.
Sutherland, J. and Scwaber, K., 2017. The Scrum Guide: The definitive guide to scrum: The rules of the game. [online] Available at: < https://www.scrumguides.org/ > [Accessed 04 July 2018].
Taylor, S., 1999. Better Learning through Better Thinking: Developing Students’ Metacognitive Abilities. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 30(1), pp.34-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.1999.10850084.
Wilhelmson, L., 1998. Learning dialogue: Discourse patterns, perspective change and learning in small group conversation. Doctoral thesis. Solna, Sweden: Stockholm University, Department of Education.
Zapater, M., Malagón, P., de Goyeneche, J-M. and Moya, J.M., 2013. Project-Based Learning and Agile Methodologies in Electronic Courses: Effect of Student Population and Open Issues. Electronics, 17(2), pp.82-87.