Assessing Public Water Management Efficiency in North-western Mexico with a Two-stage Bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis Model
Abstract
Purpose: Mexico faces severe water availability problems, resulting in higher stress on its distribution in many states. To resolve the increasing water demand, it is essential to evaluate public water management to ensure the success of any decision-making policies to decrease the water pressure in the country.
Methodology/Approach: For water management systems, benchmarking their performance relative to others can be an appropriate way to identify possible improvements. Using data from the National Census for drinking water and sanitation in 109 municipalities in the northwest region of Mexico, this analysis aims to evaluate the water management efficiency based on a two-stage Bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis model with intermediate variables.
Findings: The study found average efficiency in water system management but very low efficiency in system improvements. Additionally, no relationship was identified between the two stages or population size and density.
Research Limitation/Implication: The study highlights the need for transparent water policies to address the country's shortage. Adjusting municipal public water system management operations and designing future strategic planning is essential.
Originality/Value of paper: The presented analysis investigates a relationship between water management and water system improvements.
Full text article
References
Alarcón-Herrera, M.T., Martin-Alarcon, D.A., Gutiérrez, M., Reynoso-Cuevas, L., Martín-Domínguez, A., Olmos-Márquez, M.A. and Bundschuh, J. 2020. Co-occurrence, possible origin, and health-risk assessment of arsenic and fluoride in drinking water sources in Mexico: Geographical data visualisation. Science The Total Environment, 698, 134168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134168.
Alarcón-Martínez, J.E., Güemes-Castorena, D. and Flegl, M. 2023. Comparative Analysis of Innovation Districts to Set Up Performance Goals for Tec Innovation District. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 27(2), pp. 158-176. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v27i2.1873.
Ablanedo-Rosas, J.H., Guerrero Campanur, A., Olivares-Benitez, E., Sánchez-García, J.Y. and Nuñez-Ríos, J.E. 2020. Operational Efficiency of Mexican Water Utilities: Results of a Double-Bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis, Water, 12(2), 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020553.
Assaf, A. and Matawie, K.M. 2010. Improving the accuracy of DEA efficiency analysis: a bootstrap application to the health care foodservice industry. Applied Economics, 42(27), pp. 3547-3558. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840802112497.
Avilés-Sacoto, E.C., Avilés-Sacoto, S.V., Güemes-Castorena, D. and Cook, W.D., 2021. Environmental performance evaluation: A state-level DEA analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 78, 101082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101082.
Azam, M., 2022. Governance and Economic Growth: Evidence from 14 Latin America and Caribbean Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13, pp. 1470-1495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00781-2.
Barbosa, A., de Lima, S.C. and Brusca, I. 2016. Governance and efficiency in the Brazilian water utilities: A dynamic analysis in the process of universal access. Utilities Policy, 43, 82-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.06.013.
Conagua, 2019. Estadísticas del Agua en México 2019 [Water Statistics in Mexico 2019]. [online] Comisión Nacional del Agua. Available at: http://sina.conagua.gob.mx/publicaciones/EAM_2019.pdf.
Conagua, 2022a. Sistema Nacional de Información del Agua [National System of Water Information]. National Water Commission of Mexico (CONAGUA). [online] Available at: http://sina.conagua.gob.mx/sina/index.php [Accessed 28 October 2022].
Conagua, 2022b. Monitor de Sequía de México [Mexico Drought Monitor]. National Water Commission of Mexico (CONAGUA). [online] Available at: https://smn.conagua.gob.mx/es/climatologia/monitor-de-sequia/monitor-de-sequia-en-mexico [Accessed 3 August 2022].
Cooper, W., Seiford, L. and Zhu, J., 2011. Handbook on data envelopment analysis. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6151-8.
Dénes, R.V., Kecskés, J., Koltai, T. and Dénes, Z., 2017. The Application of Data Envelopment Analysis in Healthcare Performance Evaluation of Rehabilitation Departments in Hungary. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 21(3), pp. 127-142. https://doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V21I3.920.
Dyson, R.G., Allen, R., Camanho, A.S., Podinovski, V.V., Sarrico, C.S. and Shale, E.A., 2001. Pitfalls and protocols in DEA European Journal of Operational Research, 132, pp. 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1.
Fitzová, H. and Matulová, M., 2020. Comparison of urban public transport systems in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: Factors underpinning efficiency. Research in Transportation Economics, 81, 100824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100824.
Güngör-Demirci, G., Lee, J. and Keck, J., 2017. Measuring water utility performance using non-parametric linear programming. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 34(3-4), pp. 206-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2018.1425403.
GWP, 2017. Efficiency in Water Management. [online] The Global Water Partnership. [online] Available at: https://www.gwp.org/en/learn/iwrm-toolbox/Management-Instruments/Efficiency_in_Water_Management/ [Accessed 20 October 2022].
Hall, P., 1986. On the number of bootstrap simulations required to construct a confidence interval. The Annals of Statistics, 14, pp. 1453-1462.
Hančlová, J. and Chytilová, L., 2023. Education Performance of Czech Public Higher Education Institutions Using Data Envelopment and Panel Regression Analysis. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 16(4), pp. 313-328. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2023.160405.
He, C., Liu, Z., Wu, J., Pan, X., Fang, Z., Li, J. and Bryan, B.A., 2021. Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions. Nature Communications, 12, 4667. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25026-3.
INEGI, 2020. Censo Nacional de Gobiernos Municipales y Demarcaciones Territoriales de la Ciudad de México 2019 [National Census of Municipal Governments and Territorial Demarcations of Mexico City 2019]. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. [online] Available at: https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/cngmd/2019/ [Accessed 20 April 2021].
INEGI, 2021. Gross Domestic Product by Federal Entity. Base year 2013. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. [online] Available at: https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/tabulados/default.aspx?pr=17&vr=6&in=2&tp=20&wr=1 [Accesssed 3 August 2022].
Kao, C. and Hwang, S.-N., 2008. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), pp. 418-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041.
Libralato, G., Volpi Ghirardini, A. and Avezzù, F., 2012. To centralise or to decentralise: An overview of the most recent trends in wastewater treatment management. Journal of Environmental Management, 94(1), pp. 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.010.
Lombardi, G.V., Stefani, G., Paci, A., Becagli, C., Miliacca, M., Gastaldi, M., Giannetti, B.F. and Almeida, C.M.V.B., 2019. The sustainability of the Italian water sector: An empirical analysis by DEA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, pp. 1035-1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.283.
Molinos-Senante, M., Porcher, S. and Maziotis, A., 2018. Productivity change and its drivers for the Chilean water companies: A comparison of full private and concessionary companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, pp. 908-916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.227.
Morán-Valencia, M., Flegl, M. and Güemes-Castorena, D., 2023. A state-level analysis of the water system management efficiency in Mexico: Two-stage DEA approach. Water Resources and Industry, 29, 100200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2022.100200.
Ngo, T. and Hong Tsui, K.W., 2021. Estimating the confidence intervals for DEA efficiency scores of Asia-Pacific airlines. Operational Research: An International Journal, 22, pp. 3411-3434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-021-00667-w.
Pan, D., Hong, W. and Kong, F., 2020. Efficiency evaluation of urban wastewater treatment: Evidence from 113 cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China. Journal of Environmental Management, 270, 110940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110940.
Pan, Z., Wang, Y., Zhou, Y. and Wang, Y., 2020. Analysis of the water use efficiency using super-efficiency data envelopment analysis. Applied Water Science, 10, 139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01223-1.
Reuters, 2022. Mexico declares drought in northern state of Nuevo Leon matter of 'national security'. [online] Available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/mexico-declares-drought-northern-state-nuevo-leon-matter-national-security-2022-07-30/ [Accessed 7 September 2022].
Salazar-Adams, A., 2021. The efficiency of post-reform water utilities in Mexico. Utilities Policy, 68, 101153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2020.101153.
Silva Pinto, F., Simões, P. and Cunha Marques, R., 2017. Water services performance: do operational environment and quality factors count?. Urban Water Journal, 14(8), pp. 773-781. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2016.1254254.
Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W., 1998. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in non-parametric frontier models. Management Science, 44(1), pp. 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.1.49.
SMN, 2022. Servicio Meteorológico Nacional (Nationa Weather Service). Mexican Drought Monitor. [online] Available at: https://smn.conagua.gob.mx/es/climatologia/monitor-de-sequia/monitor-de-sequia-en-mexico [Accessed 22 October 2022].
Sun, Y., Liu, N., Shang, J. and Zhang, J., 2017. Sustainable utilization of water resources in China: A system dynamics model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(Part 2), pp. 613-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.110.
Tourinho, M., Santos, P.R., Pinto, F.T. and Camanho, A.S., 2022. Performance assessment of water services in Brazilian municipalities: An integrated view of efficiency and access. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 79, 101139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101139.
Tziogkidis, P., 2012. Bootstrap DEA and hypothesis testing. Cardiff Economics Working Papers, No. E2012/18, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff.
Walker, N.L., Norton, A., Harris, I., Williams, A.P. and Styles, D., 2019. Economic and environmental efficiency of UK and Ireland water companies: Influence of exogenous factors and rurality. Journal of Environmental Management, 241, 263-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.093.
WWAP, 2017. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2017. Wastewater: The Untapped Resource. United Nations World Water Assessment Programme, Paris, UNESCO. [online] Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf000024715 [Accessed 10 November 2023].
Yang, F., Wang, D., Zhao, L. and Wei, F., 2021. Efficiency evaluation for regional industrial water use and wastewater treatment systems in China: A dynamic interactive network slacks-based measure model. Journal of Environmental Management, 279, 111721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111721.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Martin Flegl, David Güemes-Castorena, Marien Morán-Valencia, Aldo I. Ramírez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.