Consistency of Pairwise Comparisons and Its Role in Optimal Detection of Customers’ Preferences
Abstract
Purpose: This paper analyses a problem that originates in the weighted-average model, a mathematical construct introduced by the theory of multicriteria decision-making that can be used to detect what product a customer desires. The problem occurs because the model needs to know the weight the customer assigns to each product feature, aside from the levels of all the product characteristics, in order to calculate the overall value of the product. And since by one approach the weights can be estimated by optimization, the question arises which optimization criterion to select for the procedure, as different criteria will lead to different weights and thus to different product evaluations. The paper analyses the problem in connection with the so-called consistency of pairwise comparisons, which are utilized in the optimization and describe how much the customer prefers one product feature to another. The analysis shows that the problem of which criterion to use to calculate the weights can be eliminated if the pairwise comparisons are consistent. The analysis is performed within pre-defined criteria and is supplemented with case studies supporting the findings.
Methodology/Approach: Linear algebra, optimization techniques, case studies.
Findings: The results represent a prescription customers can use if they want to avoid the pitfalls of selecting a specific optimization criterion when informing the product maker about what they want based on the weighted-average model.
Research Limitation/Implication: The results are related to a specific decision-making model, although that model is still very general and natural.
Originality/Value of paper: The problem of selecting an optimization criterion to determine decision weights is not discussed in the theory.Full text article
References
Bertsekas, D., 2016. Nonlinear Programming. 3rd Edition. Massachusetts: Athenas Scientific.
Bican, L., 2000. Lineární algebra a geometrie. Prague: Academia.
Bonnans, J.F., Gilbert, J.C., Lemarechal., C. and Sagastizábal, C.A., 2006. Numerical Optimization. Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
EqsQuest, 2017. Symbolab. [online] Available at: < https://www.symbolab.com/solver/matrix-eigenvalues-calculator > [Accessed 13 March 2020].
Ishizaka, A. and Nemery, P. 2013. Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: Methods an Software. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Levy, H., 2015. Stochastic Dominance: Investment Decision Making under Uncertainty. Springer International Publishing.
Nocedal, J. and Wright, S., 2006. Numerical Optimization. New York: Springer International Publishing.
Park, D.G., Kwun, Y.Ch, Park, J.H. and Park, I.Y., 2009. Correlation Coefficient of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Its Application to Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making Problems. Mathematical and Computer Modelling [e-journal], 50(9-10), pp.1279-1293. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2009.06.010.
Ramík, J. and Perzina, R., 2008. Moderní metody hodnocení a rozhodování. Karviná: Silesian University in Opava.
Ramík, J. and Tošenovský, F., 2013. Rozhodovací analýza pro manažery. Karviná: Silesian University in Opava.
Saaty, T.L., 2005. Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
Shiraishi, S., Obata, T. and Daigo, M., 1998. Properties of a Positive Reciprocal Matrix and Their Application to AHP. Journal of the Operations Research [e-journal], 41(3), pp.404-414. doi: 10.15807/jorsj.41.404.
Wang, Z., Li, K. and Wang, W., 2009. An Approach to Multiattribute Decision Making with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Assessments and Incomplete Weights. Information Sciences [e-journal], 179(17), pp.3026-3040. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2009.05.001.
Ye, J., 2010. Multicriteria Fuzzy Decision-Making Method Using Entropy Weights-Based Correlation Coefficients of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Applied Mathematical Modelling [e-journal], 34(12), pp.3864-3870. doi: 10.1109/IHMSC.2009.23.
Zgodavova, K. and Slimak, I., 2008. Advanced Improvement of Quality. In: B. Katalinc, ed. Annals of DAAAM for 2008 & Proceedings of the 19th International DAAAM Symposium: Intelligent Manufacturing & Automation: Focus on Next Generation of Intelligent Systems and Solutions. Trnava, Slovakia, 22-25 October 2008. Wien: DAAM.
Authors
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.