Idea of Quality Versus Idea of Excellence

Marko Kiauta

Abstract

This study investigates professionals on the field of quality, are responsible to give to customer honest clarification of fundamental ideas. Quality movement is losing credibility with suggesting that the idea of quality is replacing with the idea of excellence. Findings are based on more than 25 years of practice in professional promotion of quality: in consulting on private and public sector, from 1990 lead auditor at SIQ (Slovenian Institute of Quality), from 1998 lead assessor – commission for Slovenian Excellence Quality Award. Theory is developed based on: Noriaki Kano theory of Attractive quality, Tito Conti ideas on TQM and applications problems of Excellence model, Practical case of General Hospital Novo Mesto (in 1998 first attempt of using EM, than forced to build QMS based on ISO 9001 and then returned to practice EM). Findings: We really need to amplify and to understand the concept of quality in a much wider way. To treat excellence related activities separated from all others quality management activities is not god solution. The name of EFQM Excellence Model should be replaced with Quality Management Model. Research limitations/implications: This paper present findings mainly based on practice in Slovenia and especially in public sector where practicing of CAF is not giving expected benefits. Practical implications: The three styles of quality management (improvements to reach demands, improvements to reach expectations, improvements to react on new conditions and needs) should be connected with personal development. Theory is developed based on: Noriaki Kano theory of Attractive quality, Tito Conti ideas on TQM and applications problems of Excellence model. We need integration moments. Integration is other word for creativity and health. It leads to integrity. Excellence is only one of three states of quality. If we ask: How? The answer is bad, good or excellent. All three are possible states of the same parameter.

References

Adizes, I. C., (2009), How to Manage in Times of Crisis, Asee, Novi Sad.

Adizes, I. C., (2011), Category Archives: Managerial Insights [blog], Available at: http://www.ichakadizes.com/category/managerial-insights/

Cobb, C. G., (2003), From quality to business excellence: A systems approach to management, Wisconsin: ASQ Quality Press.

Dahlgaard-Park S. M. (2009), Decoding the Code of Excellence, International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, Vol. 1 (1), pp. 5-28

Dahlgaard-Park S. M. and Dahlgaard J. J. (2003), “The Human Dimension: Critical to Sustainable Quality”, In Conti, T., Kondo, Y. & Watson, G. (eds.) Quality into the 21st Century - Perspectivesvon Quality, Competitiveness & Sustained Performance, Milwaukee, Wisconsin: ASQ Press, pp. 73-103.

International Organization for Standardization (2009), ISO 31000:2009 Risk management -- Principles and guidelines, Geneva: ISO.

International Organization for Standardization (2010), ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility. Geneva: ISO.

Wikipedia contributors (2012), “Kano model”, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kano_model&oldid=525667424

Kiauta, M. (2011), Kako se odzivamo na krizo? (How we react to the crisis?), Bulletin: Economics, Organisation and Informatics in Healthcare, University of Primorska, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technology, Versita, Koper

Kosovel, S., (1976), Red atom, Partizanska knjiga, Ljubljana

Pavliha, M. (2010), We are not born only for ourselves alone, Libris, Koper

Shahar, B. (2012), “Learn to fail or fail to learn”, The happiness coach [blog], March 15, Available at: http://thehappinesscoach.biz/learn-to-fail-or-fail-to-learn

Authors

Marko Kiauta
tangramtqc@amis.net (Primary Contact)
Kiauta, M. (2012). Idea of Quality Versus Idea of Excellence. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 16(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v16i2.74
Copyright and license info is not available

Article Details

Are the ‘Illnesses’ of Traditional Likert Scales Treatable?

Zsuzsanna E. Tóth, Gábor Árva, Rita V. Dénes
Abstract View : 354
Download :187

Methodological Assessment of Data Suitability for Defect Prediction

Peter Schlegel, Daniel Buschmann, Max Ellerich, Robert H. Schmitt
Abstract View : 278
Download :158