Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to recognize significant innovation determinants on firms’ product, process, and overall innovation activity.
Methodology/Approach: The source of data for the analysis is the Community Innovation Survey 2012-2014. If the company has implemented the relevant innovation activity, they acquire a value of 1, or, if the company has not performed a certain activity in the period, they reached 0. As the variables are binary, the logistic regression analysis was used.
Findings: Based on the results from the analysis, we defined the proper determinants of firms’ innovation activities but unfortunately, firms are not able to achieve innovative outputs, specifically within CEE countries. This is due, among other things, to several factors such as different conditions in individual countries, different innovation policies at the national as well as company level, managerial approach (aversion) to risk, mistrust between the various actors, and many others. A typical example is the impact of internal R&D on firm innovations. While in the case of product innovations we found a significant positive impact, in the case of process innovations the impact was negative
Research Limitation/Implication: We performed on outdated data and we did not make a comparison with countries from Western Europe.
Originality/Value of paper: The paper analyses innovation determinants and it is importance for innovation activities within the CEE countries.
Asim, Z. and Sorooshian, S., 2019. Exploring the Role of Knowledge, Innovation and Technology Management (KNIT) Capabilities that Influence Research and Development. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, [e-journal] 5(2), 21p. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc5020021.
Asimakopoulos, G., Revilla, A.J. and Slavova, K., 2020. External knowledge sourcing and firm innovation efficiency. British Journal of Management, [e-journal] 31(1), pp.123-140. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12367.
Bacon, E., Williams, M.D. and Davies, G., 2020. Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations. Journal of Business Research, [e-journal] 115, pp.307-316. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.005.
Barcelo-Valenzuela, M., Carrillo-Villafaña, P.S., Perez-Soltero, A. and Sanchez-Schmitz, G., 2016. A framework to acquire explicit knowledge stored on different versions of software. Information and Software Technology, [e-journal] 70, pp.40-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.09.007.
Barkhordari, S., Fattahi, M. and Azimi, N.A., 2019. The impact of knowledge-based economy on growth performance: Evidence from MENA countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, [e-journal] 10(3), pp.1168-1182. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-018-0522-4.
Battistutti, O.C. and Bork, D., 2017. Tacit to explicit knowledge conversion. Cognitive processing, [e-journal] 18(4), pp.461-477. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-017-0825-6.
Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H. and Moedas, C., 2018. Open innovation: research, practices, and policies. California management review, [e-journal] 60(2), pp.5-16. DOI: 10.1177/0008125617745086.
Brinkley, I., 2006. Defining the knowledge economy. London: The Work Foundation.
Carayannis, E. and Grigoroudis, E., 2014. Linking innovation, productivity, and competitiveness: implications for policy and practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, [e-journal] 39(2), pp.199-218. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-012-9295-2.
Che, T., Wu, Z., Wang, Y. and Yang, R., 2019. Impacts of knowledge sourcing on employee innovation: the moderating effect of information transparency. Journal of Knowledge Management, [e-journal] 23(2), pp.221-239. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-11-2017-0554.
Chergui, W., Zidat, S. and Marir, F., 2018. An approach to the acquisition of tacit knowledge based on an ontological model. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, [e-journal] 32(7), pp.818-828. DOI: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.09.012.
Chesbrough, H.W., 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
Chesbrough, H.W., 2017. The future of open innovation: The future of open innovation is more extensive, more collaborative, and more engaged with a wider variety of participants. Research-Technology Management, [e-journal] 60(1), pp.35-38. DOI: 10.1080/08956308.2017.1255054.
Chlebovský, V., Schüller, D. and Škapa, S., 2018. Are product innovation-oriented firms prepared for effective product customization?. Scientific papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration. 44/2018, pp.77-89.
D'Attoma, I. and Ieva, M., 2020. Determinants of technological innovation success and failure: Does marketing innovation matter?. Industrial Marketing Management, [e-journal] 91, pp.64-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.08.015.
Divisekera, S. and Nguyen, V.K., 2018. Determinants of innovation in tourism evidence from Australia. Tourism Management, [e-journal] 67, pp.157-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.01.010.
Dries, L., Pascucci, S., Török, Á. and Tóth, J., 2014. Keeping your secrets public? Open versus closed innovation processes in the Hungarian wine sector. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, [e-journal] 17(1030-2016-82970), pp.147-162. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.163358.
Dziallas, M. and Blind, K., 2019. Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis. Technovation, [e-journal] 80, pp.3-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005.
Forsman, H., 2011. Innovation capacity and innovation development in small enterprises. A comparison between the manufacturing and service sectors. Research policy, [e-journal] 40(5), pp.739-750. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.003.
Goffin, K. and Koners, U., 2011. Tacit knowledge, lessons learnt, and new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, [e-journal] 28(2), pp.300-318. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00798.x.
Hau, Y.S., Kim, B., Lee, H. and Kim, Y.G., 2013. The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions. International Journal of Information Management, [e-journal] 33(2), pp.356-366. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.10.009.
Hudec, O., 2015. Visegrad countries and regions: Innovation performance and efficiency. Quality Innovation Prosperity, [e-journal] 19(2), pp.55-72. DOI: 10.12776/qip.v19i2.593.
Ili, S., Albers, A. and Miller, S., 2010. Open innovation in the automotive industry. R&d Management, [e-journal] 40(3), pp.246-255. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00595.x.
Ivanova-Gongne, M., Koporcic, N., Dziubaniuk, O. and Mandják, T., 2018. Collecting rich qualitative data on business relationships and networks in CEE countries: Challenges and plausible solutions. Industrial Marketing Management, [e-journal] 70, pp.193-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.07.007.
Janger, J., Schubert, T., Andries, P., Rammer, C. and Hoskens, M., 2017. The EU 2020 innovation indicator: A step forward in measuring innovation outputs and outcomes?. Research Policy, [e-journal] 46(1), pp.30-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.001.
Juknevičienė, V., 2017. Regional absorptive capacity and regional disparities in Lithuania: linkages, evidences and insights. Scientific papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 40/2017, pp.71-82.
Jurajda, Š., Kozubek, S., Münich, D. and Škoda, S., 2017. Scientific publication performance in post-communist countries: still lagging far behind. Scientometrics, [e-journal] 112(1), pp.315-328. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2389-8.
Kathoefer, D.G. and Leker, J., 2012. Knowledge transfer in academia: an exploratory study on the Not-Invented-Here Syndrome. The Journal of technology transfer, [e-journal] 37(5), pp.658-675. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-010-9204-5.
Kotkova Stříteská, M. and Prokop, V., 2020. Dynamic Innovation Strategy Model in Practice of Innovation Leaders and Followers in CEE Countries—A Prerequisite for Building Innovative Ecosystems. Sustainability, [e-journal] 12(9), 3918. DOI: 10.3390/su12093918.
Kraftova, I. and Kraft, J., 2018. The Relationship between Pro-Innovation Factors and the Performance of the European Union Member States and their Regions. Inžinerine Ekonomika/Engineering Economics, [e-journal] 29(4), pp.424-433. DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.29.4.19703.
Lavčák, M., Hudec, O. and Sinčáková, Ž., 2019. Local and Institutional Factors of Start-Up Ecosystems: Common and Inherited Attributes. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, [e-journal] 10(4), pp.1765-1783. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-019-00598-0.
Lewandowska, M.S., Szymura-Tyc, M. and Gołębiowski, T., 2016. Innovation complementarity, cooperation partners, and new product export: Evidence from Poland. Journal of Business Research, [e-journal] 69(9), pp.3673-3681. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.028.
Li, Y., Tarafdar, M. and Rao, S.S., 2012. Collaborative knowledge management practices. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, [e-journal] 32(4), pp.398-422. DOI: 10.1108/01443571211223077.
Liu, W. and Atuahene-Gima, K., 2018. Enhancing product innovation performance in a dysfunctional competitive environment: The roles of competitive strategies and market-based assets. Industrial Marketing Management, [e-journal] 73, pp.7-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.01.006.
Lukovics, M., Flipse, S.M., Udvari, B. and Fisher, E., 2017. Responsible research and innovation in contrasting innovation environments: Socio-Technical Integration Research in Hungary and the Netherlands. Technology in Society, [e-journal] 51, pp.172-182. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.09.003.
MacVaugh, J. and Schiavone, F., 2010. Limits to the diffusion of innovation. European journal of innovation management, [e-journal] 13(2), pp.197-221. DOI: 10.1108/14601061011040258.
Mahdi, O.R., Nassar, I.A. and Almsafir, M.K., 2019. Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities. Journal of Business Research, [e-journal] 94, pp.320-334. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.013.
Manzini, R., Lazzarotti, V. and Pellegrini, L., 2017. How to remain as closed as possible in the open innovation era: the case of Lindt & Sprüngli. Long range planning, [e-journal] 50(2), pp.260-281. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2015.12.011.
Minárik, P., Vokoun, M. and Stellner, F., 2018. Innovative activity and business cycle: Austria in the 19th and 20th century. Economics and Management. E&M Economics and Management, [e-journal] 21(2), pp.53-68. DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2018-2-004.
Mokyr, J., 2002. The gifts of Athena: Historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Momeni, F., Elahi, N. and Najafi, S.M.S., 2017. Appropriate theoretical framework for understanding and analyzing economic issues in knowledge-based economy. Journal of the knowledge economy, [e-journal] 8(3), pp.957-976. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-015-0307-y.
Nielsen, B.B., 2010. Strategic fit, contractual, and procedural governance in alliances. Journal of Business Research, [e-journal] 63(7), pp.682-689. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.001.
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H., 1995. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford university press.
Odei, S.A., Stejskal, J. and Prokop, V., 2020. Revisiting the Factors Driving Firms’ Innovation Performances: The Case of Visegrad Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, pp.1-14. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-020-00669-7.
Park, S.O., 2001. Regional innovation strategies in the knowledge-based economy. GeoJournal, [e-journal] 53(1), pp.29-38. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015814611617.
Prokop, V. and Stejskal, J., 2019a. Different influence of cooperation and public funding on innovation activities within German industries. Journal of Business Economics and Management, [e-journal] 20(2), pp.384-397. DOI: 10.3846/jbem.2019.9620.
Prokop, V. and Stejskal, J., 2019b. Determinants of innovation activities and SME absorption–Case study of Germany.
Scientific papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 46/2019, pp.134-146.
Prokop, V., Stejskal, J. and Hudec, O., 2019. Collaboration for innovation in small CEE countries. E+M Ekonomie a Management, [e-journal] 22(1), pp.130-144. DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2019-1-009.
Prokop, V., Stejskal, J., and Hajek, P., 2018. The influence of financial sourcing and collaboration on innovative company performance: A comparison of Czech, Slovak, Estonian, Lithuanian, Romanian, Croatian, Slovenian, and Hungarian case studies. In: J. Stejskal, P. Hajek and O. Hudec, eds. 2018. Knowledge Spillovers in Regional Innovation Systems (pp. 219-252). Springer, Cham.
Rohrbeck, R. and Gemünden, H.G., 2011. Corporate foresight: Its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of a firm. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [e-journal] 78(2), pp.231-243. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.019.
Stejskal, J., Mikušová Meričková, B., and Prokop, V., 2016. The cooperation between enterprises: significant part of the innovation process: a case study of the czech machinery industry. E+M Ekonomie a Management, [e-journal] 14(3), pp.110-122. DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2016-3-008.
Sun, Y., Liu, J. and Ding, Y., 2020. Analysis of the relationship between open innovation, knowledge management capability and dual innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, [e-journal] 32(1), pp.15-28. DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2019.1632431.
Tchamyou, V.S., 2017. The role of knowledge economy in African business. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, [e-journal] 8(4), pp.1189-1228. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-016-0417-1.
Vasin, S.M., Gamidullaeva, L.A., Wise, N. and Korolev, K.Y., 2020. Knowledge exchange and the trust institution: A new look at the problem. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, [e-journal] 11(3), pp.1026-1042. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-019-00588-2.
Wang, S., Fan, J., Zhao, D. and Wang, S., 2016. Regional innovation environment and innovation efficiency: the Chinese case. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, [e-journal] 28(4), pp.396-410. DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2015.1095291.
Žítek, V. and Klimova, V., 2016. Identification of Knowledge Bases: The Case of the Czech Republic. Engineering Economics, [e-journal] 27(5), pp.568-577. DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.27.5.14276.
Zona, F., Zattoni, A. and Minichilli, A., 2013. A contingency model of boards of directors and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm size. British Journal of Management, [e-journal] 24(3), pp.299-315. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00805.x.