Determinants of Innovation Capability: An Exploratory Study of Inclusive Leadership and Work Engagement
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore how innovation capability can be enhanced by inclusive leadership. In particular, the focus is on identifying the key drivers of work engagement and the role of leadership in boosting the innovation capability.
Methodology/Approach: This research has a qualitative exploratory nature. The exploratory fieldwork is based on an in-depth interview with the CEO, field observations and on the analysis of relevant corporate sources.
Findings: The research provides further confirmation of the link between inclusive leadership, work engagement and innovation capability. Specifically, authentic communication and leadership traits such as trust, courage, humility, empathy and gratitude are considered to be among the most important enablers of an inclusive environment that leads to business success.
Research Limitation/Implication: This study contributes to a better understanding of how companies could enhance innovation capabilities by leveraging the power of inclusion. The subjective business evidence coming from only one company constitute the main limitations of the present study.
Originality/Value of paper: This paper contributed to leadership and innovation literature. The results of this work provide a thorough understanding of the mechanisms for improving work engagement and, consequently, innovation capability. By grounding our research in both theory and empirical evidence, we provide valuable insight for both academia and practice.
Full text article
References
Adler, P.S. and Shenhar, A.J., 1990. Adapting Your Technological Base: The Organizational Challenge. Sloan Management Review, 32(1), pp.25-37.
Agarwal, R. and Selen, W., 2009. Dynamic Capability Building in Service Value Networks for Achieving Service Innovation. Decision Sciences, [e-journal] 40(3), pp.431-475. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2009.00236.x.
Akman, G. and Yilmaz, C., 2008. Innovative capability, innovation strategy and market orientation: an empirical analysis in turkish software industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, [e-journal] 12(01), pp.69-111. DOI: 10.1142/S1363919608001923.
Alblooshi, M., Shamsuzzaman, M. and Haridy, S., 2020. The relationship between leadership styles and organisational innovation : A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. European Journal of Innovation Management,
[e-journal] 24(2), pp.338-370. DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-11-2019-0339.
AlQershi, N.A., Diah, M.L.B.M., Latiffi, A.B.A. AND Ahmad, W.N.K.W., 2020. Strategic Innovation and Competitive Advantage of Manufacturing SMEs: The Mediating Role of Human Capital. Quality Innovation Prosperity, [e-journal] 24(3), pp.70-89. DOI: 10.12776/qip.v24i3.1493.
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K. and Zhou, J., 2014. Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework. Journal of Management, [e-journal] 40(5), pp.1297-1333. DOI: 10.1177/0149206314527128.
Aragón-Correa, J.A., García-Morales, V.J. and Cordón-Pozo, E., 2007. Leadership and organizational learning’s role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management, [e-journal] 36(3), pp.349-359. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.09.006.
Avery, D.R., McKay, P.F., Wilson, D.C. and Volpone, S., 2008. Attenuating the effect of seniority on intent to remain: The role of perceived inclusiveness. In: Academy of Management, Meeting of the Academy of Management: 2008 Annual Meeting. Anaheim, California, 8-13 August 2008.
Barratt, M., Choi, T.Y. and Li, M., 2011. Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications. Journal of Operations Management, [e-journal] 29(4), pp.329-342. DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2010.06.002.
Bizovičar, M., 2017. Anketa: Zakaj menite, da ste zaželen delodajalec?. DELO, [online] 28 Sept. Available at: < https://old.delo.si/gospodarstvo/kariera/anketa-zakaj-menite-da-ste-zazelen-delodajalec.htm l> [Accessed 16 July 2021].
Björkdahl, J. and Börjesson, S., 2012. Assessing firm capabilities for innovation. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, [e-journal] 5(1/2), p.171. DOI: 10.1504/IJKMS.2012.051970.
Boscarol, I., 2011. NASA Blog. Ajdovščina: Pipistrel.
Boscarol, I., 2020. Pipistrelovo 19-sedežno letalo bo poletelo pred letom 2030. Interviewed by Borut Podgoršek. [portal] Sierra5.net, 14 Dec. Available at: < https://www.sierra5.net/novice-novo/novice/item/3737-pipistrelovo-19-sedezno-letalo-bo-poletelo-pred-letom-2030 > [Accessed 16 July 2021].
Bourke, J., 2016. The six signature traits of inclusive leadership. Deloitte Insights, [online] 14 April. Available at: < https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/talent/six-signature-traits-of-inclusive-leadership.html > [Accessed 16 July 2021].
Caulfield, J.L. and Senger, A., 2017. Perception is reality: change leadership and work engagement. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, [e-journal] 38(7), pp.927-945. DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-07-2016-0166.
Choi, S.B., Tran, T.B.H. and Kang, S.-W., 2017. Inclusive Leadership and Employee Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Person-Job Fit. Journal of Happiness Studies, [e-journal] 18(6), pp.1877-1901. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-016-9801-6.
De Nul, L., Breque, M. and Petridis, A., 2021. Industry 5.0: towards a sustainable, human centric and resilient European industry. LU: Publications Office of the European Union.
De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., De Witte, H. and Van Hootegem, G., 2015. Job Design, Work Engagement and Innovative Work Behavior: A Multi-Level Study on Karasek’s Learning Hypothesis. Management Revue, [e-journal] 26(2), pp.123-137. DOI: 10.1688/mrev-2015-02-DeSpiegelaere.
Denning, S., 2013. Why Agile can be a game changer for managing continuous innovation in many industries. Strategy & Leadership, [e-journal] 41(2), pp.5-11. DOI: 10.1108/10878571311318187.
Doyle-Kent, M. and Kopacek, P., 2020. Industry 5.0: Is the Manufacturing Industry on the Cusp of a New Revolution?. In: N.M. Durakbasa and M.G. Gençyılmaz, eds., Proceedings of the International Symposium for Production Research 2019. Vienna, Austria, 28-30 August 2019. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp.432-441. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-31343-2_38.
Dumančič, M., 2018. Pipistrel zasadil lopato na Kitajskem. RTVSLO.si, [online] 11 April. Available at: < https://www.rtvslo.si/gospodarstvo/pipistrel-zasadil-lopato-na-kitajskem/451649 > [Accessed 16 July 2021].
Eagly, A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C. and Van Engen, M.L., 2003. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, [e-journal] 129(4), pp.569-591. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569.
Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, [e-journal] 14(4), pp.532-550. DOI: 10.2307/258557.
Iddris, F., 2016. Innovation Capability: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, [e-journal] 11, pp.235-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/3571.
Jong, J.D. and Hartog, D.D., 2010. Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, [e-journal] 19(1), pp.23-36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x.
Kahn, W.A., 1990. Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, [e-journal] 33(4), pp.692-724. DOI: 10.5465/256287.
Kotter, J.P. and Cohen, D.S., 2002. The Heart of Change: Real-Life Stories of How People Change Their Organizations. Boston, Massachutsetts: Harvard Business Review Press. Available at: < https://store.hbr.org/product/the-heart-of-change-real-life-stories-of-how-people-change-their-organizations/2549 > [Accessed 16 July 2021].
Kovač, J., Mühlbacher, J. and Kodydek, G., 2012. Uvod v management sprememb. Kranj: Moderna organizacija v okviru Fakultete za organizacijske vede.
Lawson, B. and Samson, D., 2001. Developing Innovation Capability in Organisations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach. International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), 05(03), pp.377-400.
Le, P.B. and Lei, H., 2019. Determinants of innovation capability: the roles of transformational leadership, knowledge sharing and perceived organizational support. Journal of Knowledge Management, [e-journal] 23(3), pp.527-547. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-09-2018-0568.
Liao, S.-H., Chen Ch.-Ch., Hu, D.-Ch., Chung, Y.-Ch. And Liu, Ch.-L., 2017. Assessing the influence of leadership style, organizational learning and organizational innovation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, [e-journal] 38(5), pp.590-609. DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-11-2015-0261.
Lyman, M., Ref, R. and Wright, O., 2018. Cornerstone of future growth: Ecosystems. Research Report. Accenture. Available at: < https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/PDF-77/Accenture-Strategy-Ecosystems-Exec-Summary-May2018-POV.pdf#zoom=50 >.
Maletič, M., Gomišček, B. and Maletič, D., 2021. The missing link: sustainability innovation practices, non-financial performance outcomes and economic performance. Management Research Review. (ahead-of-print). DOI: 10.1108/MRR-09-2020-0562.
McMillan, C., 2010. Five competitive forces of effective leadership and innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, [e-journal] 31(1), pp.11-22. DOI: 10.1108/02756661011012741.
Moore, J.F., 1993. Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, [online] 1 May. Available at: < https://hbr.org/1993/05/predators-and-prey-a-new-ecology-of-competition > [Accessed 17 July 2021].
Morgan, J., 2017. Why the Millions We Spend on Employee Engagement Buy Us So Little. Harvard Business Review, [online] 10 March. Available at: < https://hbr.org/2017/03/why-the-millions-we-spend-on-employee-engagement-buy-us-so-little > [Accessed 16 July 2021].
Najmaei, A. and Sadeghinejad, Z., 2019. Inclusive Leadership: A Scientometric Assessment of an Emerging Field. Diversity within Diversity Management, [e-journal] 22, pp.221-245. DOI: 10.1108/S1877-636120190000022012.
Nembhard, I.M. and Edmondson, A.C., 2006. Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, [e-journal] 27(7), pp.941-966. DOI: 10.1002/job.413.
Pacaiova, H. and Nagyova, A., 2015. Risk assessment Methodology in SMES. In: SGEM (International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences), 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2015: Conference Proceedings. Albena, Bulgaria, 18-24 June 2015. Curran Associates. pp.769-782. DOI: 10.5593/SGEM2015/B52/S23.102.
Pacaiova, H. and Nagyova, A., 2019. Risk Based Thinking – New Approach for Modern Enterprises’ Management. In J.I. Kantola, S. Nazir and T. Barath, eds. Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Society. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp.524-536. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-94709-9_52.
Prasad, B. and Junni, P., 2016. CEO transformational and transactional leadership and organizational innovation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Management Decision, [e-journal] 54(7), pp.1542-1568. DOI: 10.1108/MD-11-2014-0651.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), 2019. PwC’s 22nd Annual Global CEO Survey: CEOs’ curbed confidence spells caution. [pdf] PwC. Available at: < https://www.pwc.com/mu/pwc-22nd-annual-global-ceo-survey-mu.pdf > [Accessed: 16 July 2021].
Rich, B.L., LePine, J.A. and Crawford, E.R., 2010. Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, [e-journal] 53(3), pp.617-635. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468988.
Schaufeli, W.B., 2018. Work engagement in Europe: Relations with national economy, governance and culture. Organizational Dynamics, [e-journal] 47(2), pp.99-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2018.01.003.
Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. and Bakker, A.B., 2002. The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, [e-journal] 3(1), pp.71-92. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015630930326.
Som, O., Kirner, E. and Jäger, A., 2015. The Absorptive Capacity of Non-R&D-Intensive Firms. In: O. Som and E. Kirner, eds. 2015. Low-Tech Innovation. Springer: Springer Books. pp.145-164. Available at: < https://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/sprsprchp/978-3-319-09973-6_5f9.htm > [Accessed 17 July 2021].
Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K., 2015. Leadership and Organizational Culture as the Normative Influence of Top Management on Employee’s Behaviour in the Innovation Process. Procedia Economics and Finance, [e-journal] 34, pp.396-402. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01646-9.
Talmar, M., Walrave, B., Podoynitsyna, K.S., Holmström and Rommea, A.G.L., 2020. Mapping, analyzing and designing innovation ecosystems: The Ecosystem Pie Model. Long Range Planning, [e-journal] 53(4), p. 101850. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2018.09.002.
Terziovski, M., 2007. Building Innovation Capability in Organizations: An International Cross-Case Perspective. World Scientific Books, No. p.492. Available at: < https://ideas.repec.org/b/wsi/wsbook/p492.html >
[Accessed 16 July 2021].
Turisova, R., Sinay, J., Pacaiova, H., Kotianova,Z. and Glatz, J., 2020. Application of the EFQM Model to Assess the Readiness and Sustainability of the Implementation of I4.0 in Slovakian Companies. Sustainability, [e-journal] 12(14), p.5591. DOI: 10.3390/su12145591.
Villaluz, V.C. and Hechanova, M.R.M., 2018. Ownership and leadership in building an innovation culture. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, [e-journal] 40(2), pp.138-150. DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-05-2018-0184.
Vladić, N., 2017. Od talenta do uspeha. Kranj: Izdano v samozaložbi.
Yin, R.K., 2018. Case study research and applications: Design and Methods. Sixth edition. SAGE Publications Inc.
Zandan, N. and Shalett, L., 2020. What Inclusive Leaders Sound Like. Harvard Business Review, [online] 19 Nov. Available at: < https://hbr.org/2020/11/what-inclusive-leaders-sounds-like > [Accessed 16 July 2021].
Željan, K. and Voh Boštic, A., 2011. Pipistrel osvojil Nasino nagrado. DELO, [online] 3 Oct. Available at: < https://old.delo.si/gospodarstvo/podjetja/pipistrel-osvojil-nasino-nagrado-2.html > [Accessed 16 July 2021].
Zhexembayeva, N., 2020. Stop Calling It “Innovation”. Harvard Business Review, [online] 19 Feb. Available at: < https://hbr.org/2020/02/stop-calling-it-innovation > [Accessed 16 July 2021].
Authors
Copyright (c) 2021 Nenad Vladić, Damjan Maletič, Matjaž Maletič
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.