Developing a Quality 4.0 Maturity Index for Improved Business Operational Efficiency and Performance
Abstract
Purpose: Technological advances and increased environmental turbulence require a transition in quality management. The study aimed at developing a Quality 4.0 maturity index for improved business operational efficiency and performance.
Methodology/Approach: This conceptual paper introduces a theoretical business evaluative model that allows an integrated analysis of technology-driven, quality management dimensions. The model is based on theoretical and empirical information and describes Quality 4.0 business analysis by a theoretical central business dimensional concept, formal statistical analytical methods and uses these data to assign a maturity index score to the business.
Findings: The study builds the Quality 4.0 maturity index following the analysis of seven continuous quality improvement dimensions. The maturity of these dimensions in the business is assessed with a five-point maturity level. The effectiveness of the index should be confirmed with fit as covariation and a composite score for the level of Quality 4.0 maturity.
Research Limitation/Implication: The research is based on theory and has not been validated with empirical data. It is recommended that a validation study be conducted based on the approach and guidelines provided in the paper.
Originality/Value of paper: The study helped develop a theoretical aspect of total quality management during an era of the fourth industrial revolution. It also aimed at practically benefiting a business by focussing on improved business capacity and capability to mitigate the environmental turbulence associated with pandemics. The paper provides novel work, as it describes one of the first Quality 4.0 maturity index models that may be used to improve business.
Full text article
References
Agus, A. and Hassan, Z., 2011. Enhancing production performance and customer performance through Total Quality Management (TQM): Strategies for competitive advantage. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, pp.1650-1662.
Al Shaar, E.Q., Khattab, S.A., Alkaied, R.N. and Manna, A.Q., 2015. The effect of top management support on innovation: the mediating role of synergy between organizational structure and information technology. International Review of Management and Business Research, 4(2), pp. 499-513.
Albayrak, T. and Caber, M., 2013. Penalty–Reward-Contrast Analysis: a review of its application in customer satisfaction research. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, [e-journal] 24(11-12), pp.1288-1300. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2013.776757.
Alweteed, N., 2018. The Impact of Total Quality Management on the Organization Performance. European Journal of Business and Management, 10(34), pp.69-71.
Antony, J., Sony, M., Furterer, S., McDermott, O. and Pepper, M., 2022. Quality 4.0 and it’s impact on organizational performance: An intergrative viewpoint. The TQM Journal, [e-journal] (ahead-of-print). DOI: 10.1108/TQM-08-2021-0242.
Aquilani, B., Silvestri, C., Ruggieri, A. and Gatti, C., 2017. A systematic literature review on total quality management critical success factors and the identification of new avenues of research. The TQM Journal, [e-journal] 29(1), pp.184-213. DOI: 10.1108/TQM-01-2016-0003.
Asadollahfardi, G., Zamanian, M., Mirmohammadi, M., Asadi, M. and Tameh, F.I., 2015. Air pollution study using factor analysis and univariate Box-Jenkins modeling for the northwest of Tehran. Advances in Environmental Research, [e-journal] 4(4), pp.233-246. DOI: 10.12989/aer.2015.4.4.233.
Asdecker, B. and Felch,V., 2018. Development of an Industry 4.0 maturity model for the delivery process in supply chains. Journal of Modelling in Management, [e-journal] 13(4), pp.840-883. DOI: 10.1108/JM2-03-2018-0042.
Bergman, B. and Klefsjö, B., 2010. Quality from customer needs to customer satisfaction. Studentlitteratur AB. Lund University.
Bernon, M., Bastl, M., Zhang, W. and Johnson, M. 2018. Product recalls: The effects of industry, recall strategy and hazard, on shareholder wealth. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 13, pp.1-14.
Bhutta, K. and Huq, F., 1999. Benchmarking – Best Practices: an Integrated Approach. Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology, [e-journal] 6(3), pp.254-268. DOI: 10.1108/14635779910289261.
Biggemann, S., Kowalkowski, C., Maley, J. and Brege, S., 2013. Development and implementation of customer solutions: A study of process dynamics and market shaping. Industrial Marketing Management, [e-journal] 42(7), pp.1083-1092. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.07.026.
Bouranta, N., Psomas, E., Suárez-Barraza, M.F. and Jaca, C., 2019. The key factors of total quality management in the service sector: a cross-cultural study. Benchmarking: An International Journal, [e-journal] 26(6), pp.1-31. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-09-2017-0240.
Broday, E.E., 2022. The evolution of quality: from inspection to quality 4.0. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, [e-journal] (ahead-of-print). DOI: 10.1108/IJQSS-09-2021-0121.
Büyüközkan, G. and Maire, J.L., 1998. Benchmarking Process Formalization and a Case Study. Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology, [e-journal] 5(2), pp.101-125. DOI: 10.1108/14635779810212356.
Byrne, B.M., 2004. Testing for multi-group invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less travelled. Structural Equation Modelling, [e-journal] 11(2), pp.272-300. DOI: 10.1207/s15328007sem1102_8.
Carnerud, D. and Bäckström, I., 2021. Four decades of research on quality: summarising, Trendspotting and looking ahead. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, [e-journal] 32(9-10), pp.1023-1045. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2019.1655397.
Carvalho, A.V., Enrique D.V., Chouchenea, A. and Charrua-Santos, F., 2021. Quality 4.0: An Overview. Procedia Computer Science, 181, pp.341-346.
Cavaliere, L.P.L., Khan, R., Sundram, S., Jainani, K., Bagale, G., Chakravarthi, M.K., Regin, R. and Rajest, S.S., 2021. The Impact Of Customer Relationship Management On Customer Satisfaction And Retention: The Mediation Of Service Quality. Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, 32(3), pp.22107-22121.
Chang, W., Ellinger, A.E. and Blackhurst, J., 2015. A contextual approach to supply chain risk mitigation. The International Journal of Logistics Management, [e-journal] 26(3), pp.642-656. DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0026
Chatterjee, S. and Chaudhuri, R., 2021. Supply chain sustainability during turbulent environment: Examining the role of firm capabilities and government regulation. Oper Manag Res, [e-journal] (ahead-of-print). DOI: 10.1007/s12063-021-00203-1.
Chiarini, A., 2020. Industry 4.0, quality management and TQM world. A systematic literature review and a proposed agenda for further research. The TQM Journal, [e-journal] 32(4), pp.603-616. DOI: 10.1108/TQM-04-2020-0082.
Deshpande, A., 2019. Total Quality Management, Concurrent Engineering and Manufacturing Performance: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Operations and Strategic Planning, [e-journal] 2(1), pp.35-64. DOI: 10.1177/ 2516600X19845230.
Dias, M.A., Carvalho, A.M. and Sampaio, P., 2021. Quality 4.0: literature review analysis, definition and impacts of the digital transformation process on quality. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, [e-journal] 39(6), pp.1312-1335. DOI: 10.1108/IJQRM-07-2021-0247.
Dziuban, C.D. and Shirkey, E.S., 1974. When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychology Bulletin, 81, pp.358-361.
Efimova, A. and Briš, P., 2021. Quality 4.0 for Processes and Customers. Quality Innovation Prosperity, [e-journal] 25(3), pp.33-47. DOI: 10.12776/qip.v25i3.1609.
Ettorchi-Tardy, A., Levif, M. and Michel, P., 2012. Benchmarking: a method for continuous quality improvement in health. Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante, 7(4), e101–e119.
Evans, J.R., 2017. Quality and Performance Excellence: Management, Organization and Strategy. 8th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Fayyaz, A., 2021. Total Quality Management and its Implementation in the Context of Pakistan. Theory Methodology Practice, 17(2), pp. 45-51.
Felix, E., 2015. Marketing Challenges of Satisfying Consumers Changing Expectations and Preferences in a Competitive Market. International Journal of Marketing Studies, [e-journal] 7(5), pp.41-52. DOI: 10.5539/ijms.v7n5p41.
Fernaldi, D.L., Hotlan, S. and Selvie, J.O., 2020. The Effects of Top Management Commitment on Operational Performance Through the Use of Information Technology and Supply Chain Management Practices. ICSH. SHS Web of Conferences, [e-journal] 79, pp.1-12. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20207601009.
Fundin, A., Lilja, J., Lagrosen, Y. and Bergquist, B., 2020. Quality 2030: quality management for the future. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, [e-journal], pp.1-17. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2020.1863778.
Gaskin, S.P., Griffin, A., Hauser, J.R., Katz, G.M. and Klein, R.L., 2010. Voice of Customer. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Goetsch, D.L. and Davis, S.B., 2014. Quality Management for Organizational Excellence. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Gold, S.C. and Pray, T.F., 1999. Changing Customer Preferences and Product Characteristics in the Design of Demand Functions. Simulation & Gaming, [e-journal] 30(3), pp.264-282. DOI: 10.1177/104687819903000303.
Guan, A.L.C., Manavalan, M., Ahmed, A.A.A., Azad, M.M. and Miah, S., 2022. Role of internet of things (IoT) in enabling productive work from home (wfh) for environmental volatiles. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 26(1), pp. 1-11.
Gunasekaran, A., Subramanian, N. and Ngai, W.T.E., 2019. Quality management in the 21st century enterprises: Research pathway towards Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Economics, [e-journal] 207, pp.125-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.005.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E., 2018. Multivariate Data Analysis. 8th ed. United Kingdom: Cengage Learning.
Hassan, R.S., Nawaz, A., Lashari, M.N. and Zafar, F., 2015. Effect of Customer Relationship Management on Customer Satisfaction. Procedia Economics and Finance, [e-journal] 23, pp.563-567. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00513-4.
Honarpour, A., Jusoh, A. and Nor, K., 2012. Knowledge Management, Total Quality Management and Innovation: A New Look. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, [e-journal] 7(3), pp.22-31. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-27242012000300003.
Huizingh, E., 2011. Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, [e-journal] 31(1), pp.2-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002.
Igartua, J.I., Garrigós, J.A. and Hervas-Oliver, J.L., 2010. How innovation management techniques support an open innovation strategy. Research Technology Management, [e-journal] 53, pp.41-52. DOI: 10.1080/08956308.2010.11657630.
Jacob, D., 2017. Quality 4.0 impact and strategy handbook: getting digitally connected to transform quality management. Cambridge: LNS Research.
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R.P. and Suman, R., 2021. Significance of Quality 4.0 towards comprehensive enhancement in manufacturing sector. Sensors International, [e-journal] 2, pp.1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100109.
Kailong, E.K., 2019. Application of Demings cycle in benchmarking and performance in public Secondary schools in Keiyo sub-county, Kenya. International Journal of Advanced Research, 7(4), pp.991-999.
Kaiser, H.F., 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, pp.31-36.
Lee, S.M., Lee, D. and Kim, Y.S., 2019. The quality management ecosystem for predictive maintenance in the Industry 4.0 era. International Journal of Quality Innovation, [e-journal] 5(4), pp.1-11. DOI: 10.1186/s40887-019-0029-5.
Long, C.S., Kowang, T.O., Fei, G.C. and Mang, H.P., 2016. Importance of Knowledge Management on Total Quality Management: A Review. World Applied Sciences Journal, [e-journal] 34(12), pp.1829-1833. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2016.1829.1833.
Magno, F., 2012. Managing product recalls: The effects of time, responsible vs. Opportunistic recall management and blame on consumer‘s attitudes. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, [e-journal] 58, pp.1309-1315. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1114.
Malhotra, N., Mavondo, F., Mukherjee, A. and Hooley, G., 2013. Service quality of frontline employees: A profile deviation analysis. Journal of Business Research, [e-journal] 66(9), pp.1338-1344. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.034.
Martin-Delgado, J., Martínez-García, A., Aranaz, J.M., Valencia-Martín, J.L. and Mira, J.J., 2020. How Much of Root Cause Analysis Translates into Improved Patient Safety: A Systematic Review. Medical Principles and Practice, [e-journal] 29(6), pp.524-531. DOI: 10.1159/000508677.
Mihajlović, I. and Koncul, N., 2016. Changes in consumer behaviour – the challenges for providers of tourist services in the destination. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, [e-journal] 29(1), pp. 914-937. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2016.1206683.
Milosevic, D., Djuric, M., Filipovic, J. and Ristic, S., 2013. Benchmarking as a Quality Management Tool in Public Administration. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, [e-journal] 24(4), pp.364-372. DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.24.4.2785.
Milunovic Koprivica, S., Maric, A., Ristic, O. and Arsovski, S., 2019. Social oriented quality: from quality 4.0 towards quality, and 5.0. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences, [e-journal] 1(2), pp.405-410. DOI: 10.24874/PES01.02.038.
Morgan, C. and Murgatroyd, S., 1997. Total quality management in the public sector. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Moriarty, J.P. and Smallman, C., 2009. En route to a theory of benchmarking. Benchmarking: An International Journal, [e-journal] 16(4), pp.484-503. DOI: 10.1108/14635770910972423.
Mortara, L., Kerr, C.I.V., Phaal, R. and Probert, D.R., 2009. Technology Intelligence Practice in UK Technology-Based Companies. International Journal of Technology Management, [e-journal] 48(1), pp.115-135. DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2009.024603.
Mosadeghrad, A.M., 2013. Obstacles to TQM success in health care systems. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, [e-journal] 26(2), pp.147-173. DOI: 10.1108/09526861311297352.
Mtotywa, M.M., 2019. Conversations with Novice Researchers. East London: AndsM.
Mtotywa, M.M., Manqele, S.P., Mthethwa, N., Seabi, M.A. and Moitse, M., 2022. Barriers to Effectively Leveraging Opportunities within the Fourth Industrial Revolution in South Africa. African Journal of Developmental Studies, [e-journal] 2, pp.213-236. DOI: 10.31920/2634-3649/2022/sin1a10.
Mtotywa, M.M., Seabi, M.A. and Moitse, M., 2021. South African citizens‘ self-assessed knowledge about the fourth industrial revolution. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, [e-journal], pp.1-10. DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2021.1961358.
Nenadál, J., 2020. The New EFQM: what is really new and could be considered as a suitable tool with respect to quality 4.0. Quality Innovation Prosperity, [e-journal] 24(1), pp.17-28. DOI: 10.12776/qip.v24i1.1415.
Nguyeni, L. and Nagase, K., 2019. The influences of total quality management on consumer satisfaction. International Journal of Healthcare Management, [e-journal] 12(4), pp.277-285. DOI: 10.1080/20479700.2019.1647378 .
Nicola, M., Zaid, A., Sohrabi, C., Kerwan, A., Al-Jabir, A., Iosifidis, C., Agha, M. and Agha, R., 2020. The socio-economic implication of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A Review. International. Journal of Surgery, [e-journal] 78, pp.185-193. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018.
Oakland, J., 1989. Total quality management. Oxford, UK: Heinemann.
Petropoulos, F., Apiletti, D., Assimakopoulos, V. and Yusupova, A., Ziel, F., 2022. Forecasting: theory and practice. International Journal of Forecasting, [e-journal] 38(3), pp.705-871. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.11.001.
Prajogo, D.I. and Cooper, B., 2017. The individual and organizational level effects of TQM practices on job satisfaction. International Journal of Manpower, [e-journal] 38(2), pp.215-225. DOI: 10.1108/IJM-12-2014-0240.
Prajogo, D.I. and Hong, S.W., 2008. The effect of TQM performance in R&D environments: A perspective from South Korean firms. Technovation, [e-journal] 28(12), pp.855-863. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.06.001.
Psomas, E. and Fotopoulos, C., 2010. Total quality management practices and results in food companies. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59(7), pp.688-687.
Rifqi, H., Zamma, A., Souda, B. and Hansali, M., 2021. Lean Manufacturing Implementation through DMAIC Approach: A case study in the automotive industry. Quality Innovation Prosperity, [e-journal] 25(2), pp.54-77. DOI: 10.12776/qip.v25i2.1576.
Sader, S., Husti, I. and Daróczi, M., 2019. Industry 4.0 as a Key Enabler toward Successful Implementation of Total Quality Management Practices. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, [e-journal] 27(2), pp.131-140. DOI: DOI:10.3311/PPso.12675.
Sader, S., Husti, I and Daroczi, M., 2022. A review of quality 4.0: definitions, features, technologies, applications and challenges. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, [e-journal] 33(9-10), pp.1164-1182. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2021.1944082.
Sadikoglu, E. and Olcay, H., 2014. The Effects of Total Quality Management Practices on Performance and the Reasons of and the Barriers to TQM Practices in Turkey. Advances in Decision Sciences, [e-journal] 2014, pp.1-17. DOI: DOI:10.1155/2014/537605.
Santouridis, I. and Veraki, A., 2017. Customer relationship management and customer satisfaction: the mediating role of relationship quality. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, [e-journal] 28(9-10), pp.1122-1133. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2017.1303889.
Schumacher, A., Erol, S. and Sihn, W., 2016. A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises. Procedia CIRP, [e-journal] 52, pp.161-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040.
Sony, M. and Aithal, P.S., 2020. Practical lessons for engineers to adapt towards Industry 4.0. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, I.T. and Education, [e-journal] 4(2), pp.86-97. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.
Taha, H., 2017. Operations Reseach An Itroduction. Essex, England: Pearson.
Talib, F., 2013. An overview of total quality management: understanding the fundamentals in service organization. International Journal of Advanced Quality Management, 1(1), pp.1-20.
Venkatraman, N., 1989. Strategic Orientation of Business Enterprises: The Construct, Dimensionality and Measurement. Management Science, [e-journal] 35(8), pp.942-962. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.942.
Vo, B., Kongar, E. and Suárez-Barraza, M.F., 2020. Root-Cause Problem Solving in an Industry 4.0 Context. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48, pp.48-56.
Watkins, W., 2018. Exploratory factor Analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, [e-journal] 44(3), pp.219-246. DOI: 10.1177/0095798418771807.
Weckenmann, A., Akkasoglu, G. and Werner, T., 2015. Quality management–history and trends. The TQM Journal, 27(3), pp.281-293. DOI: 10.1108/TQM-11-2013-0125.
Willmington, C., Belardi, P., Murante, A.M. and Vainieri, M., 2022. The contribution of benchmarking to quality improvement in healthcare. A systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research, [e-journal] 22(1), pp.1-20. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07467-8.
Zairi, M., 2013. The TQM legasy – Gurus' contributions and theoretical impact. The TQM Journal, [e-journal] 25(6), pp.659-679. DOI: 10.1108/TQM-06-2013-0069.
Zhao, X., Li, Y. and Flynn, B.B., 2013. The financial impact of product recall announcements in China. International Journal of Production Economics, [e-journal] 142, pp.115-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.10.018.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2022 Matolwandile Mzuvukile Mtotywa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.