Artificial Intelligence for Enhancing Engineering Project Management During Emergencies: Perception-based Analysis
Abstract
Purpose: The research studies the impact of various Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools on engineering project management and describes how they affect management success during emergencies in the Ukrainian context. Special attention is paid to the skills comprising AI readiness among engineers and their formation in the system of continuous education.
Methodology/Approach: The study employed a perception-based analysis and applied the social cognitive theory and expectancy theory, enabling structured opinion-based questionnaires on Likert scales and assessing engineering project success after the introduction of AI tools. The research involved 96 engineers with diverse roles and expertise representing civil engineering companies or military organisations.
Findings: The research explained the peculiarities of some challenges hindering engineering project management and defined traditional, agile, and hybrid engineering project management used during emergencies. 25 AI tools were outlined, and their impact on project success was revealed. The category of AI readiness was described, and its components were presented.
Research Limitation/implication: Since the perception-based analysis relies on subjective views, it may not fully present the objective evaluation of AI tools in engineering project management during emergencies. The findings can be used to improve engineers' training programs by integrating AI-focused modules.
Originality/Value of paper: The research provides a context-specific understanding of how AI can be applied to the unique challenges faced in Ukraine.
Full text article
References
Abu Awwad K. W., Shibani, A. and Ghostin M., 2022. Exploring the critical success factors influencing BIM level 2 implementation in the UK construction industry: the case of SMEs. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(10), pp. 1894-1901. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1744213.
Bhinder N. V., 2019. Professional Training of Border Guards in Ukraine: Challenges and Opportunities Related to Emerging Security Threats. Educational Process: International Journal, 8(1), 72-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2019.81.5.
Carreras-Coch A., Navarro J., Sans C., and Zaballos A., 2022. Communication Technologies in Emergency Situations. Electronics, 11(7), article 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11071155.
Chmyr, V. and Bhinder, N., 2023. AI in the Higher Military Institutions: Challenges and Perspectives for Military Engineering Training. Rupkatha Journal, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v15n4.11.
Ciric Lalic, D., Lalic, B., Delić, M., Gracanin, D. and Stefanovic, D., 2022. How project management approach impact project success? From traditional to agile. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 15(3), pp. 494-521. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-04-2021-0108.
Dajerling, A. 2023. Evolution of the military project management concept. Introduction to low-code and no-code project management. Defence Sciences Review, 17, pp. 15-28. https://doi.org/10.37055/pno/177656.
Dong, H., Dacre, N., Baxter, D. and Ceylan S., 2024. What is Agile Project Management? Developing a New Definition Following a Systematic Literature Review. Project Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241254095.
Epstein, A. L. and Harding, G. H., 2020. Chapter 98 – Disaster planning and emergency preparedness. In: E. Iadanza, ed. Clinical Engineering Handbook. Academic Press. pp. 699-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813467-2.00099-7.
Gemino, A., Horner Reich, B. and Serrador, P. M., 2021. Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success: Is Hybrid a Poor Second Choice? Project Management Journal, 52(2), pp. 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820973082.
Gepp, M., Hellmuth, A., Schäffler, T. and Vollmar, J., 2014. Success Factors of Plant Engineering Projects. Procedia Engineering, 69, pp. 361-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.244.
Hoang Yen, P., Anh Thi, N., Trut Thuy, P., Thanh Thao, L., Thi Anh Thu, H. and Huong Tra, N., 2024. Challenges of Implementing Outcome-Based Assessment in Vietnamese Higher Education – A Qualitative Inquiry. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i1.123.
Horobets, O. and Motuzka, O., 2023. Big data support for project management in the conditions of war: Experience of Ukraine. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy, 2(42). https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijite/30062023/7991.
Jiang, W., Zhao, X., Cai, C., Chang, K., Liu, K. and Liu, Y., 2024. Study on Resilience Evaluation for Construction Management of Major Railway Projects. Buildings, 14(3), article 732. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030732.
Lamprou, A. and Vagiona, D., 2018. Success criteria and critical success factors in project success: a literature review. RELAND: International Journal of Real Estate & Land Planning, 1, pp. 276-284. https://doi.org/10.26262/reland.v1i0.6483.
Marnewick, C. and Marnewick, A. 2021. Digital intelligence: A must-have for project managers. Project Leadership and Society, 2, article 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2021.100026.
Moea K., 2024. Analysis of Lesotho secondary education aims for curriculum ideologies integration. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i1.167.
Myronenko, O., 2023. Assessing the efficiency of application of project management in the field of engineering of innovative developments. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(13(124), pp. 94–100. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.285542.
Nenni, M. E., De Felice, F., De Luca, C. and Forcina, A., 2024. How artificial intelligence will transform project management in the age of digitisation: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00418-z.
Noran, O., 2014. Collaborative disaster management: An interdisciplinary approach. Computers in Industry, 65(6), pp. 1032-1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2014.04.003.
Odejide, O. A. and Edunjobi, T. E., 2024. AI in project management: Exploring theoretical models for decision-making and risk management. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(3), pp. 1072-1085. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i3.959.
Radujković, M. and Sjekavica, M., 2017. Project Management Success Factors. Procedia Engineering, 196, pp. 607-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.048.
Steen, R., Haakonsen, G. and Steiro, T. J., 2023. Patterns of Learning: A Systemic Analysis of Emergency Response Operations in the North Sea through the Lens of Resilience Engineering. Infrastructures, 8(2), article 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures8020016.
Taboada, I., Daneshpajouh, A., Toledo, N. and de Vass, T., 2023. Artificial Intelligence Enabled Project Management: A Systematic Literature Review. Applied Sciences, 13(8), article 5014. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13085014.
Torichnyi, O. and Bhinder, N., 2019. Organisational Methods of Formation of Military and Special Competence in Future Border Guard Officers in the Continuing Education Process. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(4Sup1), pp. 278-301. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/190.
Xue, R., Baron, C., Vingerhoeds, R. and Esteban, P., 2021. Enhancing Engineering Project Management Through Process Alignment. Engineering Management Journal, 34(2), pp. 230-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2020.1865002
Zabala-Vargas, S., Jaimes-Quintanilla, M. and Jimenez-Barrera, M. H., 2023. Big Data, Data Science, and Artificial Intelligence for Project Management in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Industry: A Systematic Review. Buildings, 13(12), article 2944. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13122944.
Zahoor, M. H. and Ali, M., 2023. Assessment of Critical Success Factors for Building Projects through the Literature. Engineering Proceedings, 53(1), article 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCBD2023-15988.
Zhu, D., Wang, S. and Li, Y., 2023. Strategic management and risk control of emergency hospital construction: SWOT and STPA framework from a systems thinking perspective. PloS one, 18(11), article e0295125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295125.
Žužek, T., Gosar, Ž., Kušar, J. and Berlec, T., 2020. Adopting Agile Project Management Practices in Non-Software SMEs: A Case Study of a Slovenian Medium-Sized Manufacturing Company. Sustainability, 12(21), article 9245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219245.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Viktor Chmyr
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.