Effects of Systematic Changes in Commodity Arrangement on the Satisfaction of Supermarket Customers

Josef Tošenovský, Filip Tošenovský, Ivana Dočkalová

Abstract

Purpose: The paper investigates if relocation of goods at supermarkets, practised to boost sales, bothers customers and improves financial results of the stores. To explore this, a questionnaire-based poll was run, using questions, such as “Do you mind if commodity is not permanently in the same place?”, or “While searching, do you buy anything you did not indend to buy?”. Various relations are also observed. For instance, are opinions on product relocation related in any way to age of customers? The study suggests most customers are not satisfied with changes in product location, yet the practices lead to higher sales. It turns out the business principle – only satisfied customers spend more – may not be so true. In the study, some new questions also arose and were evaluated, such as the question “Which management activities have a positive effect on customers?”.       


Methodology/Approach: The paper relies on statistical testing, specifically on the chi-square test of independence and a test of differences in the relative frequency of occurrence of diverse phenomena. Real, empirical data are utilized.


Findings: The analysis showed that most customers dislike looking for goods, and many of them buy items that they did not intend to purchase. Thus, a paradox occurs when entrepreneurs dissatisfy customers, yet they register higher profits.


Research Limitation/Implication: The results concern a specific scientific field – microeconomic behavioural patterns at supermarkets.


Originality/Value of paper: The research presented in this paper is focused on the Czech Republic where it has not been undertaken to date. Work of this kind is not cited in the scientific literature, however.

References

Babbie, E., 1998. The Practice of Social Research. Wadsworth Publishing.

Baumgartner, H. and Steenkamp, J., 2001. Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-national Investigation. Journal of Marketing Research, [e-journal] 38, pp.143-156. DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.38.2.143.18840.

Belanger, F., Hiller, J. and Smith, W., 2002. Trustworthiness in Electronic Commerce: The Role of Privacy, Security, and Site Attributes. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, [e-journal] 11(3-4), pp.245-270. DOI: 10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00018-5.

Cao, X. and Mokhtarian, P., 2005. The Intended and Actual Adoption of Online Purchasing: A Brief Review of Recent Literature. Research report UCD-ITS-RR-05-07, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California.

Chang, J.CH-J., Torkzadeh, G. and Dhillon, G., 2004. Reexamining the Measurement Models of Success for Internet Commerce. Information and Management, 41(5), pp.577-584.

Chen, L., Gillenson, M. and Sherrell, D., 2002. Enticing Online Consumers: An Extended Technology Acceptance Perspective. Information and Management, [e-journal] 39(8), pp.705-719. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00127-6.

Childers, T., Carr, C., Peck, J. and Carson, S., 2001. Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations for Online Retail Shopping Behavior. Journal of Retailing, [e-journal] 77(4), pp.511-535. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00056-2.

Dijst, M., Farag, S. and Schwanen, T., 2008. A Comparative Study of Attitude Theory and Other Theoretical Models for Understanding Travel Behaviour. Environment and Planning, [e-journal] 40(4), pp.831-847. DOI: 10.1068/a39151.

Dočkalová, I., 2016. The Impact of Systematic Change of Goods Arrangement on Customer Satistfaction. Bachelor thesis. VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Donthu, N. and Garcia, A., 1999. The Internet Shopper. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(2), pp.52-58.

Eastin, M., S., 2002. Diffusion of E-commerce: Analysis of the Adoption of Four E-commerce Activities. Telematics and Informatics, [e-journal] 19(3), pp.251-267. DOI: 10.1016/S0736-5853(01)00005-3.

Ellard, J. and Rogers, T., 1993. Teaching Questionnaire Construction Effectively: The Ten Commandments of Question Writing. Contemporary Social Psychology, 17(1), pp.17-20.

Fabrigar, L., Wegener, D., MacCallum, R. and Strahan, E., 1999. Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research. Psychological Methods, [e-journal] 4(3), pp.272-299. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272.

Farag, S., Krizek, K. and Dijst, M., 2006. E-shopping and its Relationship with In-store Shopping: Empirical Evidence from the Netherlands and the USA. Transport Reviews, [e-journal] 26(1), pp.43-61. DOI: 10.1080/01441640500158496.

Gefen, D., 2000. E-commerce: The Role of Familiarity and Trust. Omega, [e-journal] 28(6), pp.725-737. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00021-9.

Goldsmith, R. and Goldsmith, E., 2002. Buying Apparel over the Internet. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, [e-journal] 11(2), DOI: 10.1108/10610420210423464.

Hansen, T., Jensen, J. and Solgaard, H., 2004. Predicting Online Grocery Buying Intention: A Comparison of the Tudory of Reasoned Action and the Tudory of Planned Behavior. International Journal of Information Management, [e-journal] 24(6), pp.539-550. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.08.004.

Hendrick, H., 1980. Human Factors in Management. In: Futures in Human Factors: 1980–2000. Symposium conducted at the Human Factors Society 24th Annual Meeting. Los Angeles, USA, 1980.

Jarvenpaa, S.L., Tractinsky, N. and Vitale, M., 2000. Consumer Trust in an Internet Store. Information Technology and Management, [e-journal] 1. DOI: 10.1023/A:1019104520776, pp.45-71.

Koufaris, M., 2002. Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior. Information Systems Research, [e-journal] 13(2), pp.205-223. DOI: 10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83.

Krizek, K., Li, Y. and Handy, S., 2005. Spatial Attributes and Patterns of Use in Household-related Information and Communications Technology Activity. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, [e-journal] 1926(1), pp.252-259. DOI: 10.1177/0361198105192600129.

Li, H., Kuo, C. and Russell, M., 1999. The Impact of Perceived Channel Utilities, Shopping Orientations and Demographics on the Consumer's Online Buying Behavior. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, [e-journal] 5(2). [online] Available at: [Accessed: 01 December 1999]. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00336.x.

Liang, T. and Juany, J., 1998. An Empirical Study on Consumer Acceptance of Products in Electronic Markets: A Transaction Cost Model. Decision Support Systems, 24(1998), pp.29-43.

Limayem, M., Khalifa. M. and Frini, A., 2000. What Makes Consumers Buy from Internet? A Longitudinal Study of Online Shopping. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part A, 30(4), pp.421-432.

Nelson, P. R., Wludyka, P. S. and Copeland, K. A. F., 2005. The Analysis of Means: A Graphical Methods for Comparing Means, Rates and Proportions. SIAM.

Ory, D. and Mokhtarian, P., 2007. Description of a Northern California Shopping Survey Data Collection Effort. Research report UCD-ITS-RR-07-03, University of California, Davis, Institute of Transportation Studies.

Perugini, M. and Conner, M., 2000. Predicting and Understanding Behavioral Volitions: The Interplay Between Goals and Behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(5), pp.705-731.

Peterson, R., Balasubramanian, S. and Bronnenberg, B., 1997. Exploring the Implications of the Internet for Consumer Marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, [e-journal] 25(4), pp.329-346. DOI: 10.1177/0092070397254005.

Shang, R., Chen, Y. and Shen, L., 2005. Extrinsic versus Intrinsic Motivations for Consumers to Shop On-line. Information and Management, [e-journal] 42, pp.401-413. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2004.01.009.

Sim, L. and Koi, S., 2002. Singapore's Internet Shoppers and the Impact on Traditional Shopping Patterns. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, [e-journal] 9(2), pp.115-124. DOI: 10.1016/S0969-6989(01)00029-7.

Tauber, E., 1972. Why Do People Shop?. Journal of Marketing, 36(4), pp.46-49.

Verhoef, P. and Langerak, F., 2001. Possible Determinants of Consumers' Adoption of Electronic Grocery Shopping in the Netherlands. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, [e-journal] 8(5), pp.275-285. DOI: 10.1016/S0969-6989(00)00033-3.

Vijayasarathy, L. and Jones, J., 2000. Print and Internet Catalog Shopping: Assessing Attitudes and Intentions. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 10(3), pp.191-202.

Walczuch, R. and Lundgren, H., 2004. Psychological Antecedents of Institution-based Consumer Trust in E-retailing. Information and Management, [e-journal] 42(1), pp.159-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2003.12.009.

Widaman, K., 1993. Common Factor Analysis versus Principal Component Analysis: Differential Bias in Representing Model Parameters? Multivariate Behavioral Research, [e-journal] 28(3), pp.263-311. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2803_1.

Wludyka, N., Karen, A. and Copeland, K., 2005. The Analysis of Means: A Graphical Method for Comparing Means, Rates, and Proportions. Philadelphia: SIAM.

Authors

Josef Tošenovský
josefnewmail@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Filip Tošenovský
Ivana Dočkalová
Tošenovský, J., Tošenovský, F., & Dočkalová , I. . (2021). Effects of Systematic Changes in Commodity Arrangement on the Satisfaction of Supermarket Customers. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 25(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v25i1.1497

Article Details