Unlocking the Dynamics of Innovation Clusters Sectoral Impacts and Organisational Capabilities
Abstract
Purpose: This article provides insights into how innovation clusters operate, how sectoral factors and organisational capabilities influence them, and how they contribute to economic growth and innovation in specific regions and industries. It provides insights into how sectoral effects, organisational capabilities, and collaboration dynamics intersect within these clusters, offering valuable information for policymakers and businesses seeking to leverage the potential of innovation clusters for regional and industry-specific development.
Methodology/Approach: The research methodology involves a literature review, quantitative survey, factor analysis, cluster analysis, and correlation analysis to explore the relationships between sectoral effects, organisational capabilities, and collaboration within innovation clusters.
Findings: The findings suggest that sector-specific effects influence cluster members' strategic and innovation capabilities. Technological complexity is predominant, impacting market orientation and product development capabilities. The article also identifies four distinct groups of organisations based on sectoral impacts and export activities within clusters.
Research Limitation/implication: While the methodology provides valuable insights, there is potential sampling bias as non-random sampling via cluster manager recommendations may introduce selection bias. The findings are specific to Hungarian innovation clusters and may not be generalised universally.
Originality/Value of paper: The uniqueness of this study lies in its holistic and data-driven exploration of innovation clusters, considering a wide range of factors and their practical implications for fostering collaboration and innovation in different industries.
Full text article
References
Alarcón-Martínez, J. E., Güemes-Castorena, D. and Flegl, M., 2023. Comparative Analysis of Innovation Districts to Set Up Performance Goals for Tec Innovation District, Quality Innovation Prosperity, 27(2), pp.158–176. doi: 10.12776/qip.v27i2.1873.
Altomonte, C., Di Mauro, F., Ottaviano, G., Rungi, A., and Vicard, V., 2013. Global Value Chains during the Great Trade Collapse. Firms in the International Economy: Firm Heterogeneity Meets International Business, pp.277–308. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262019743.003.0010
Atuahene-Gima, K. and Evangelista, F., 2000. Cross-Functional Influence in New Product Development: An Exploratory Study of Marketing and R…D Perspectives. Management Science, 46(10), pp.1269–1284 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.10.1269.12273.
Birchall, D., and Tovstiga, G., 2005. Strategic capabilities and innovation. Capabilities for Strategic Advantage, pp.66–85. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522497_5
Brancati, E., Brancati, R., and Maresca, A., 2017. Global value chains, innovation and performance: firm-level evidence from the Great Recession. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(5), pp.1039–1073. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbx003
Coase, R. H., 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica. Vol. 4., Issue 16, pp.386-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
Coenen, L., Benneworth, P. and Truffer, B., 2012. Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41(6), pp.968-979, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014.
Cooke, P. and Leydesdorff, L., 2006. Regional Development in the Knowledge-Based Economy: The Construction of Advantage. J Technol Transfer 31, pp.5–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5009-3
Cooke, P., 2008. Regional Innovation Systems, Clean Technology & Jacobian Cluster-Platform Policy. Regional Science Policy & Practice. 1(1), pp.23-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7802.2008.00002.x
De Bresson, C. (1999): An Entrepreneur cannot innovate alone; networks of enterprises are required; paper presented at the DRUID conference on systems of innovation; Aalborg. Available at : < https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=c9d7a57723c33ee997d19aa9760fda3d0413ea14> [10 February 2023]
Dobronyi, T., Halmos, L. and Somosi, É., 2012. Klasztermenedzsment Magyarország. Complex Kiadó, Budapest.
Fitjar, R.D. and Rodríguez-Pose, A., 2015. Networking, context and firm-level innovation: Cooperation through the regional filter in Norway, Geoforum, Volume 63, pp.25-35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.05.010.
Frenken, K., van Oort, F., and Verburg, T., 2007. Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), pp.685-697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296
Gelei, A., and Nagy, J., 2005. Versenyképesség az autóipari ellátási láncban - a vevői érték és dimenziói az egyes beszállító típusok esetében. Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review, pp.10–20. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2005.03.02
Håkansson, H., and Snehota, I., 2017. The Significance of Business Relationships. No Business Is an Island, pp.1–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-549-820171001
Hamdouch, A., 2007. Innovation Clusters and Networks: A Critical Review of the Recent Literature. 19th EAEPE Conference, Universidade do Porto, 1-3 November 2007. Available at < https://www.fep.up.pt/conferencias/eaepe2007/papers%20and%20abstracts_cd/hamdouch.pdf> [10 June 2022]
Hamdouch, A., 2010. Conceptualizing Innovation Networks and Clusters. In: Laperche, B. et al. (eds.) Innovation Networks and Clusters: The Knowledge Backbone. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang S.A. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1261972
Hansen, T. and Coenen, L., 2015. The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, pp.92-109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001.
Kiss, J., 2006. Az innováció és a technológiai felzárkózás vizsgálata az evolucionista közgazdaságtanban. Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review, pp.4–14. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2006.02.01
Knudsen, Ch. ed., 1996. The Competence Perspective: A Historical View in: Towards a Competence Theory of the Firm. London: Routledge.
Kohli, A. K., and Jaworski, B. J., 1990. Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), pp.1–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400201
Löfsten, H., 2016, Organisational capabilities and the long-term survival of new technology-based firms. European Business Review, 28(3). pp. 312-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-04-2015-0041
Mag Zrt., 2012. A magyar klaszteresedés elmúlt 3 éve az akkreditált innovációs klaszterek példáján keresztül. Available at: <http://magzrt.hu/nyomtatvanyok/Klaszteriroda/Klaszterek_elemzese_2012.pdf> [22 of June 2019]
Muro, M., and Katz, B., 2011. Chapter 5 The New "Cluster Moment": How Regional Innovation Clusters can Foster the Next Economy. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth, 22. pp.93–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1048-4736(2011)0000022008
Narver, J. C., and Slater, S. F., 1990. The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), pp.20–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400403
Nooteboom, B., 2005. Innovation, Learning and Cluster Dynamics. CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2005-44, Organization, Tilburg. < https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/773459/44.pdf> [10 of July 2018]
Petruska, I., 2005. A K+F marketing integráció szerepe az innovációban a műanyag-feldolgozóipar példáján. Doktori értekezés.
Porter, M.E., 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1
Porter, M.E. 1998. On Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School
Preissl, B., and Solimene, L. 2003. Clusters. Contributions to Economics, pp.41–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50011-4_3
Richardson, G.B., 1972. The Organization of Industry, Economic Journal, 82(327), pp.883–896. https://doi.org/10.2307/2230256
Scott, A. J., 2006. Creative Cities: Conceptual Issues and Policy Questions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(1), pp.1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2166.2006.00256.x
Shenkar, O., 2010. Copycats: how smart companies use imitation to gain a strategic edge. Strategic Direction, 26(10), pp.3–5. https://doi.org/10.1108/02580541011080474
Szabo, S., Ferencz, V. and Pucihar, A., 2015. Trust, Innovation and Prosperity. Quality Innovation Prosperitiy / Kvalita Inovácia Prosperita, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v17i2.224
Szakály, D., 2013. Innovációmenedzsment. Miskolci Egyetem Gazdaságtudományi Kar. Available at: <https://regi.tankonyvtar.hu/hu/tartalom/tamop412A/2011-0046_02_inno/adatok.html> [22 of July 2020]
Szanyi, M., 2008. Cluster Concept and Practice in Hungary. In: Birsan et al. (eds.) Foreign Direct Investment, Economic Growth and Labour Market Performance: Empirical Evidence for the New EU Countries. Cluj: Editura Fundatei Pentru Studii Europene Cluj.
Szanyi, M., Iwasaki, I., Csizmadia, P., Illésy, M., and Makó, C., 2010. Cluster Development in Hungary: Searching for a 'Critical Mass' of Business via Cluster Mapping. Local Economies and Global Competitiveness, pp.113–133. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294967_6
Teece, D., and Leih, S., 2016. Uncertainty, Innovation, and Dynamic Capabilities: An Introduction. California Management Review, 58(4), pp.5-12. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.5
von Hippel, E.A., 1976. The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instrument Innovation Process. Research Policy, 5(3), pp.212-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(76)90028-7
von Hippel, E.A., 1977. Transferring Process Equipment Innovations from User-innovators to Equipment Manufacturing Firms. R&D Management, 8(1), pp.13–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1977.tb01270.x
Authors
Copyright (c) 2023 Stefan Kovács
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.