Toyota Way – the Heart of Toyota Production System and its Impact on Sustainable Company Growth
Abstract
Purpose: This paper intends to evaluate the impact of Toyota Way (TW) focused activities on operational performance and its connection to sustainability and long-term success.
Methodology/Approach: Three theoretical-practical activities were implemented in a real pickup assembly plant. Performance was assessed through the recording of standard documentation before and after implementation, direct observation at the gemba, and anonymous qualitative surveys of those involved.
Findings: Results show how TW enhances workers' skills alongside TPS through experiential learning, fostering continuous improvement with minimal or no financial investment and creating value iteratively and exponentially. However, it had a limited impact on environmental factors. TW emerges as a critical link between short-term operational performance and long-term sustainable growth.
Research Limitations/Implications: The sample is restricted to a single assembly plant in Portugal. The surveys involved between 5 and 13 respondents per activity.
Originality/Value of paper: In contrast to TPS and lean manufacturing, current literature on TW is limited, often outdated, and lacks clarity regarding its Japanese and American interpretations. Furthermore, few studies emphasise the human element as a driver of company growth—a factor often overlooked by companies.
Full text article
References
Abualfaraa, W., Salonitis, K., A-Ashaab, A. and Ala’raj, M., 2020. Lean-Green Manufacturing Practices and Their Link with Sustainability: A Critical Review. Sustainability, 12(3), 981. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030981.
Bergenwall, A. L., Chen, C. and White, R. E., 2012. TPS's process design in American automotive plants and its effects on the triple bottom line and sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), pp.374-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.04.016.
Bľanda, J. and Urbančíková, N., 2020. Social Entrepreneurship as a Tool of Sustainable Development. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 24(3), pp.21-36. DOI: 10.12776/QIP.V24I3.1463.
Chiarini, A., Baccarani, C. and Mascherpa, V., 2018. Lean production, Toyota production system and Kaizen philosophy: a conceptual analysis from the perspective of Zen Buddhism. The TQM Journal, 30(4), pp. 425-438. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2017-0178.
Coetzee, R., Van der Merwe, K. and Van Dyk, L., 2016. Lean Implementation Strategies: How Are the Toyota Way Principles Addressed?. The South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 27(3), pp. 79–91. doi: 10.7166/27-3-1641.
Doiro, M., Fernández, J.F., Félix, M.J., Santos, G., 2017. ERP - machining centre integration: a modular kitchen production case study. Procédia Manufacturing, 13, 1159-1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.178.
Jayamaha, N. P., Wagner, J. P. and Grigg, N. P., 2014. The moderation effect of the cultural dimension individualism/collectivism on Toyota Way deployment; A global study on Toyota facilities. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Selangor, Malaysia, pp. 228-232, doi: 10.1109/IEEM.2014.7058634.
Lander, E. and Liker, J. K., 2007. The Toyota Production System and art: making highly customised and creative products the Toyota way. International Journal of Production Research, 45(16), pp. 3681-3698. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701223519.
Liker, J. K., 2020. The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill Education. ISBN-13978-0071392310.
Loyd, N., Harris, G., Gholston, S. and Berkowitz, D., 2020. Development of a lean assessment tool and measuring the effect of culture from employee perception. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(7), pp. 1439-1456. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-10-2019-0375.
Marksberry, P., Badurdeen, F., Gregory, B. and Kreafle, K., 2010. Management directed kaizen: Toyota's Jishuken process for management development. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 21(6):670-686 doi: 10.1108/17410381011063987.
Pisano, U., 2012. Resilience and Sustainable Developmen t: Theory of resilience, systems thinking., Vienna: European Sustainable Development Network. ESDN Quarterly Report Nº26.
Putnik, G., Ávila, P. (2016). Governance and Sustainability (Special Issue Editorial), International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 24 (2), pp.137-143, Inderscience Publishers.
Ramos, G., Pereira Lopes, M., Ávila, P. (2013). Development of a Platform for Lean Manufacturing Simulation Games. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje, 8 (4), pp. 184-190, IEEE EdSoc.
Sá, J. C., Carvalho, A., Fonseca, L.,Santos, G., Dinis-Carvalho, J. 2022. Science Based Targets and the factors contributing to the sustainable development of an organisation from a Literature review to a conceptual model. Production Engineering Archives, 29(3), pp. 241-253. doi: 10.30657/pea.2023.29.28.
Sá, J. C., Oliveira, A.R., Dinis-Carvalho, J., Santos, G., Silva, F., 2023. New Conceptual Model for Excellence in Business Towards Sustainable Development. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 27(2). 33-60. doi: 10.12776/qip.v27i2.1866.
Santos G., Rebelo, M., Ramos S., Silva, R., Pereira M., Ramos, G. N. L., 2014. Developments regarding the integration of the occupational safety and health with quality and environment management systems. In Ilias G. Kavouras and Marie-Cecile G. Chalbot. (Ed.), Developments Regarding the Integration of the Occupational Safety and Health with Quality and Environment Management Systems, 113-146. New York: Nova Publishers.
Santos, G. and Barbosa, J., 2006. Qualifound - A modular tool developed for Quality Improvement in Foundries. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(3), 351-362. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380610648308.
Silva, F.J. G., Kirytopoulos, K., Ferreira, L. P., Sá, J.C., Santos, G., Nogueira, M.C. C., 2022.The three pillars of sustainability and agile project management: How do they influence each other. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1495–1512. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2287.
Silva, S., Sá, J.C., Silva, F.J.G., Ferreira, L.P., Santos, G., 2020. Lean Green—The Importance of Integrating Environment into Lean Philosophy—A Case Study. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 122, 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41429-0_21.
Sinek, S., 2009. Start with why: how great leaders inspire everyone to take action. EUA: Penguin Business. ISBN: 9780241958223.
Sun, Z., Doiro, M., José Carlos Sá, J.C., Santos, G., 2023. Shaping the Conscious Behaviours of Product Designers in the Early Stages of Projects: Promoting Correct Material Selection and Green Self-Identity through a New Conceptual Model. Sustainability 15(19), 14463; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914463.
Takeuchi, H., Osono, E. and Shimizu, N., 2008. The contradictions that drive Toyota's success. Harvard Business Review, 86, pp. 96-105.
Teixeira, P., Coelho, A., Fontoura, P., Sá, J.C., Silva, F.J.G., Santos, G., Ferreira, L.P., 2022. Combining lean and green practices to achieve a superior performance: The contribution for a sustainable development and competitiveness—An empirical study on the Portuguese context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 29(4), 887–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2242.
TMC, 2012. Toyota Motor Corporation Global Website: 75 Years of Toyota: Current Conditions: Toyota Way 2001. [Online]
Retrieved from: https://www.toyota-global.com/company/history_of_toyota/ 75years/data/conditions/philosophy/toyotaway2001.html [accessed at 2024, july, 22].
TMC, 2024. Toyota Way 2020 / Toyota Code of Conduct: Vision and Philosophy: Company. [Online]
Retrieved from: https://global.toyota/en/company/vision-and-philosophy/ toyotaway_code-of-conduct/?padid=ag478_from_header_menu
[accessed at 2024 july 23].
Vanichchinchai, A., 2021. Assessing lean satisfaction: a care provider perspective. Operations Management Research, 14(1/2), pp. 95-106. 1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12063-021-00185-0.
Vanichchinchai, A., 2022. The effects of the Toyota Way on agile manufacturing: an empirical analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(8), pp. 1450-1472. doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-02-2022-0053.
Vanichchinchai, A., 2022. The relationships between soft and hard factors of the Toyota way: a socio-technical perspective. Operations Management Research, 16,pp. 768–779.doi: 10.1007/s12063-022-00318-z.
Vaz de Carvalho, C., Pereira Lopes, M., Ramos, G., Ávila, P., Bastos, J., Fonseca, L., Martens, I. (2013). Lean Learning Academy: an innovative framework for lean manufacturing training. In Book of Proceedings of the 1th International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education – CISPEE 2013, IEEE, part number: CFP13CIK-USB.
Vieira, T.; Sá, J. C.; Lopes, M. P.; Santos, G.; Félix, M. J.; Ferreira, L. P.; Silva, F. J. G.; Pereira, M. T., 2019. Optimisation of the cold profiling process through SMED. Procedia Manufacturing 38, 892–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. promfg.2020.01.171.
WCED, 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, Oslo: United Nations. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf (accessed at 2024 july 23).
Womack, J. P. and Jones, D. T., 2003. Lean thinking: banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. 2nd ed. London: Simon and Schuster. ISBN-100743249275.
Yülek, M.A., Santos, G., 2022. Why Income Gaps Persist: Productivity Gaps, (No) Catch-up and Industrial Policies in Developing Countries, Journal of Economic Issues, 56 (1), pp. 158-183. doi: 10.1080/00213624.2022.2020579.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Mariana Palhau, José Carlos Sá, Paulo Ávila, José Dinis-Carvalho, Carlos Rodrigues, Gilberto Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.