Abstract
Purpose: Proximity to nature is highly valued by urbanites. They demonstrate higher willingness to pay for housing at locations near open and green spaces. But, nature in cities can generate negative externalities as well. The aim of this paper is to present the complex relationship between nature and cities and the possible negative influence of urban nature on property prices.
Methodology/Approach: The data presented in this paper include open spaces, the presence of wild animals and residential property values in Haifa, Israel. These data were analyzed to uncover spatial regularities and basic statistical relationships.
Findings: The results reveal the expected presence of dominant positive externalities related to proximity to open and green areas. However, in certain areas and under certain circumstances, the nuisances generated by the presence of wild animals in close proximity to housing are correlated with lower property prices.
Research Limitation/implication: We demonstrate in this paper that that there is a complex relationship between nature and cities, albeit focusing our analysis on large mammals in cities only. Disentangling positive and negative externalities of urban nature is a challenging task. The paper presents an example of the potential difficulties that need to be dealt with in such analysis.
Originality/Value of paper: Through the case study, we show that there are good reasons to believe that there are both positive and negative externalities of nature in cities. To our best knowledge, attempts to disentangle both types of effects using property values do not exist in the literature.Full text article
References
Adams, C.E., Lindsey K.J. and Ash, S.J., 2006. Urban wildlife management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Asaber, P.K. and Huffman, F.E., 2009. The relative impacts of trails and greenbelts on home price. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 38(4), pp.408-419.
Barshaw, D., 2012. Rotten Hogs!. The times of Israel. [online] 30 March 2012. Available at: <http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/rotten-hogs/> [Accessed 10 February 2017].
Benguigui, L., Czamanski, D. and Marinov, M., 2001a. City growth as a leap-frogging process: an application to the Tel Aviv metropolis. Urban Studies, 38(10), pp.1819-1839.
Benguigui, L., Czamanski, D. and Marinov, M., 2001b. The Dynamics of urban morphology: the case of Petah Tikvah. Environment and planning B: Planning and design, 28(3), pp.447-460.
Benguigui, L., Czamanski, D. and Marinov, M., 2004. Scaling and urban growth. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 15(07), pp.989-996.
Benguigui, L., Czamanski, D., Marinov, M. and Portugali, Y., 2000. When and where is a city fractal?. Environment and planning B: Planning and design, 27(4), pp.507-519.
Bertram, C. and Rejdanz, K., 2015. The role of urban green space for human well-being. Ecological Economics, 120, pp.139-152.
Bourassa, S.C., Hoesli, M. and Sun, J., 2004. What’s in a view?. Environment and Planning A, 36(8), pp.1427-1450.
Cahill, S., Llimona, F., Cabañeros, L. and Calomardo, F., 2012. Characteristics of wild boar (Sus scrofa) habituation to urban areas in the Collserola Natural Park (Barcelona) and comparison with other locations. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 35(2), pp.221-233.
Camagni, R., Capello, R. and Nijkamp, P., 1998. Towards sustainable city policy: an economy-environment technology nexus. Ecological economics, 24(1), pp.103-118.
Conway, D., Li, C.Q., Wolch, J., Kahle, C. and Jerrett, M., 2010. A spatial autocorrelation approach for examining the effects of urban greenspace on residential property values. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 41(2), pp.150-169.
Corvalan, C., Hales, S. and McMichael, A.J., 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: health synthesis: a report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Czamanski, D., Malkinson, D. and Toger, M., 2014. Nature in Future Cities: Prospects and a Planning Agenda. Built Environment, 40(4), pp.508-520.
Daams, M.N., Sijtsma, F.J. and Van der Vlist, A.J., 2016. The Effect of Natural Space on Nearby Property Prices: Accounting for Perceived Attractiveness. Land Economics, 92(3), pp.389-410.
Earnhart, D., 2006. Using contingent-pricing analysis to value open space and its duration at residential locations. Land Economics, 82(1), pp.17-35.
ESRI, 2012. ArcGIS Desktop Release (10.1). [Computer program] Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
Haifa Municipality, 2008. Existing status report for Haifa master plan HP2000. [pdf] Haifa Municipality. Available at: <http://www1.haifa.muni.il/mitar/chapters/chap3.pdf> [Accessed 10 February 2017].
Hobbs, R.J., Higgs, E.S. and Hall, C., 2013. Novel ecosystems: intervening in the new ecological world order. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
ICBS, 2014. Haifa, 2014. [online] Available at: <http://www.cbs.gov.il> [Accessed 12 July 2016].
Irwin, E.G. and Bockstael, N.E., 2001. The problem of identifying land use spillovers: measuring the effects of open space on residential property values. American journal of agricultural economics, 83(3), pp.698-704.
Jim, C.Y. and Chen, W.Y., 2006. Impacts of urban environmental elements on residential housing prices in Guangzhou (China). Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(4), pp.422-434.
Leong, M., Bertone, M.A., Bayless, K.M., Dunn, R.R. and Trautwein, M.D., 2016. Exoskeletons and economics: indoor arthropod diversity increases in affluent neighbourhoods. Biology Letters, 12(8), 5p.
Licoppe, A., Prévot, C., Heymans, M., Bovy, C., Casaer, J. and Cahill, S., 2013. Wild boar/feral pig in (peri-) urban areas. [pdf] Brussels, Belgium: Congress of International Union of Game Biologists IUGB 2013. Available at: <http://www.wildlife-man.be/docs/urban-wild-boar-international-survey.pdf> [Accessed 10 February 2017].
Lutzenhiser, M. and Netusil, N.R., 2001. The effect of open spaces on a home’s sale price. Contemporary Economic Policy, 19(3), pp.291-298.
Mansfield, C., Pattanayak, S.K., McDow, W., McDonald, R. and Halpin, P., 2005. Shades of green: measuring the value of urban forests in the housing market. Journal of Forest Economics, 11(3), pp.177-199.
Matthies, S., Kopel, D., Rüter, S., Toger, M., Prasse, R., Czamanski, D. and Malkinson, D., 2013. Vascular Plant Species Richness Patterns in Urban Environments: Case Studies from Hannover, Germany and Haifa, Israel. In: D. Malkinson, D. Czamanski and I. Benenson, eds. 2013. Modeling of Land-Use and Ecological Dynamics. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. pp.107-118.
McKinney, M.L., 2008. Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban ecosystems, 11(2), pp.161-176.
McPhearson, T., Pickett, S.T., Grimm, N.B., Niemelä, J., Alberti, M., Elmqvist, T., Weber, C., Haase, D., Breuste, J. and Qureshi, S., 2016. Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities. BioScience, 66(3), 15p.
Netusil, N.R., Chattopadhyay, S. and Kovacs, K.F., 2010. Estimating the demand for tree canopy: a second-stage hedonic price analysis in Portland, Oregon. Land Economics, 86(2), pp.281-293.
Niemelä, J., 1999. Ecology and urban planning. Biodiversity and conservation, 8(1), pp.119-131.
Rudnick, D., Ryan, S.J., Beier, P., Cushman, S.A., Dieffenbach, F., Epps, C., Gerber, L.R., Hartter, J., Jenness, J.S., Kintsch, J. and Merenlender, A.M., 2012. The role of landscape connectivity in planning and implementing conservation and restoration priorities. Issues in Ecology, 16(Fall), pp.1-20.
Schierack, P., Römer, A., Jores, J., Kaspar, H., Guenther, S., Filter, M., Eichberg, J. and Wieler, L.H., 2009. Isolation and characterization of intestinal Escherichia coli clones from wild boars in Germany. Applied and environmental microbiology, 75(3), pp.695-702.
Schläpfer, F., Waltert, F., Segura, L. and Kienast, F., 2015. Valuation of landscape amenities: A hedonic pricing analysis of housing rents in urban, suburban and periurban Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 141, pp.24-40.
Toger, M., 2016. Urban open spaces: network morphology, dynamics and influence on wildlife foraging in Haifa. Ph.D. Technion – Israel Institute of Technology.
Toger, M., Benenson, I., Czamanski, D. and Malkinson, D., 2015. The connectivity of the Haifa urban open space network. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(5), pp.848-870.
Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kaźmierczak, A., Niemela, J. and James, P., 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and urban planning, 81(3), pp.167-178.
VanDruff, L.W. and Rowse, R.N., 1986. Habitat association of mammals in Syracuse, New York. Urban Ecology, 9(3-4), pp.413-434.
Zeller, K.A., McGarigal, K. and Whiteley, A.R., 2012. Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landscape Ecology, [e-journal] 27(6), pp.777 - 797. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9737-0.
Authors
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.