Abstract
Purpose: Design of experiment (DOE) represent very powerful tool for process improvement vastly supported by six sigma methodology. This approach is mostly used by large and manufacturing orientated companies. Presented research is focused on use of DOE in truck company, which is medium size and service orientated. Such study has several purposes. Firstly, detailed description of improvement effort based on DOE can be used as a methodological framework for companies similar to researched one. Secondly, it provides example of successfully implemented low cost design of experiment practise. Moreover, performed experiment identifies key factors, which influence the lifetime of truck tyres.
Design/methodology: The research in this paper is based on experiment conducted in Slovakian Truck Company. It provides detailed case study of whole improvement effort, together with problem formulation, design creation and analysis, as well as the results interpretation. The company wants to improve lifetime of the truck tyres. Next to fuel consumption, consumption of tyres and their replacement represent according to them, one of most costly processes in company. Improvement effort was made through the use of PDCA cycle. It start with analysis of current state of tyres consumption. The variability of tyres consumption based on years and types was investigated. Then the causes of tyres replacement were identified and screening DOE was conducted. After a screening design, the full factorial design of experiment was used to identify main drivers of tyres deterioration and breakdowns. Based on result of DOE, the corrective action were propose and implement.
Findings: Based on performed experiment our research describes process of tyres use and replacement. It defines main reasons for tyre breakdown and identify main drivers which influence truck tyres lifetime. Moreover it formulates corrective action to prolong tyres lifetime.
Originality: The study represents full description of problem solving procedure- from problem definition to evaluation of corrective action. It can be also understood as methodological guidelines for similar companies. Moreover it is example of good practise. It shows how to conduct low cost DOE based improvement effort in non-manufacturing company.
Full text article
References
Antony, J., Coleman, S., Montgomery, D. C., Anderson, M. J., and Silvestrini, R. T., 2011. Design of experiments for non-manufacturing processes: benefits, challenges and some examples. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0954405411395857.
Barad, M., 2014. Design of Experiments (DOE)—A Valuable Multi-Purpose Methodology. Applied Mathematics, 5 pp. 2120-2129, http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/am.2014.514206.
Chompu-inwai, R., Jaimjit, B., and Premsuriyanunt, P., 2014. A combination of Material Flow Cost Accounting and design of experiments techniques in an SME: the case of a wood products manufacturing company in northern Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, Available through: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.039.
Firka, D., 2011. Statistical, technical and sociological dimensions of design of experiments. The TQM Journal, 23(4) pp. 435-445.
Ilzarbe, L., 2008. Practical applications of design of experiments in the field of engineering: a bibliographical review. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 24(4) pp. 417-28.
Johnson, L. A., Steele, J. C., 2012. Five key steps to successful design of experiments. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 31(4), pp. 38-47.
Kleijnen, J. P., 2005. An overview of the design and analysis of simulation experiments for sensitivity analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 164(2), pp. 287-300
Szabo, S., Ferencz, V., and Pucihar, A., 2013. Trust, Innovation and Prosperity. Quality Innovation Prosperity. 17 (2), pp. 1-8, DOI: 10.12776/qip.v17i2.224.
Tanco, M., Viles, E., Ilzarbe, L., and Álvarez, M. J., 2008. How is experimentation carried out by companies? A survey of three European regions. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 24(8) pp. 973-981.
Authors
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.