Fuzzy Logic Methods to Evaluate the Quality of Life in the Regions of Ecuador
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this paper is to propose a methodological framework that calculates a synthetic indicator of satisfaction of citizens of the nine geographical areas of planning and development of Ecuador (zones).
Methodology/Approach: The methodology is based on fuzzy logic and the degree of similarity to ideal solutions. The information is obtained through the application of a structured survey based on the European Social Survey to the Ecuadorian society. The analysis is based on eight different dimensions of satisfaction, namely: (1) Life; (2) Economy; (3) City Government; (4) Transparency; (5) Education; (6) Health System; (7) Roads; and (8) National Government.
Findings: The results obtained help different stakeholders to have important insights about how the citizens’ quality of life and satisfaction depend to some extent on important public services that form the pillars of the social welfare, education and health system. However, our results also suggest that other areas of Ecuador can also benefit from the improvement of the policies developed by the local governments.
Research Limitation/implication: An important research limitation is based on the limited number of segment variables used in the study, the geographical zones. Thus, an important venue for future research can be envisaged including other interesting traits analyzed by other scholars, like access to the internet, the social class or the size of the city.
Originality/Value of paper: The analysis of individual satisfaction and citizens’ quality of life is paramount by the existing interdependence with social cohesion that exists nowadays in Ecuador.
Full text article
References
Athanassopoulos, A.D. and Podinovski, V.V., 1997. Dominance and potential optimality in multiple criteria decision analysis with imprecise information. Journal of the Operational research Society, 48(2), pp.142-150.
Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S.S., Omrani, H. and Panahi, A., 2011. A hybrid approach based on SERVQUAL and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating transportation service quality. Computers y Industrial Engineering, 61(3), pp.637-646.
Azizi, H., Momeni, M. and Taghinia, M., 2011. Quality of life indices assessment for disabled and elderly people: Case study of Tehran. Paper presented at Real Corp 2011. In: M. Schrenk, V.V. Popovich, P. Zeile, eds., Proceedings of the 16th international conference on urban planning, regional development and information society. Essen, Germany. 18-20 May 2011. Schwechat: CORP Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning.
Benitez, J.M., Martín, J.C. and Román, C., 2007. Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry. Tourism management, 28(2), pp.544-555.
Berggren, H.M., Fugate, G.A., Preuhs, R.R. and Still, D.R., 2004. Satisfied? Institutional determinants of citizen evaluations of democracy. Politics & Policy, 32(1), pp.72-96.
Bin, Z., Jingsha, H., Na, H., Yixuan, Z., Shiyi, Z. and Jie, J., 2015. Designs Q Simulations of Multi-factor in Trust Evaluation. International Journal of Database Theory and Application, 8(1), pp.235-244.
Bloom, D.E., Craig, P.H. and Malaney, P.N., 2001. The Quality of Life in Rural Asia. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Boone, P., 1996. Political and gender oppression as a cause of poverty. London: London School of Economics.
Buckley, J.J., 1985. Ranking alternatives. Using fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15(1), pp.21-31.
Büyüközkan, G. and Çifçi, G., 2012. A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), pp.2341-2354.
Chang, Y.H. and Yeh, C.H., 2001. Evaluating airline competitiveness using multiattribute decision making. Omega, 29(5), pp.405-415.
Chen, S.J. and Hwang C.L., 1991. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. New York: Springer.
Chen, S.M., 1996. Evaluating weapon systems using fuzzy arithmetic operations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 77(3), pp.265-276.
Cheung, F. and Lucas, R.E., 2016. Income inequality is associated with stronger social comparison effects: The effect of relative income on life satisfaction. Journal of personality and social psychology, 110(2), pp.332-341.
Choudhury, K., 2015. Evaluating customer-perceived service quality in business management education in India: A study in topsis modeling. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 27(2), pp.208-225.
Cutler, F., Nuesser, A. and Nyblade, B., 2013. Evaluating the quality of Democracy with Individual Level models of Satisfaction: Or, A Complete Model of Satisfaction with Democracy. In: ECPR, General Conference Sciences Po. Bordeaux. 4-7 September 2013. Colchester: European Consortium for Political Research.
Dasgupta, P. and Weale, W., 1992. On measuring the quality of life. World Development, 20(1), pp.119-131.
Ecuador Inmediato, 2016. 56% de ecuatorianos consideran que el gobierno trabaja para el pueblo, según informe. [online] Available at: <http://www.ecuadorinmediato.com/index.php?module=Noticias&func=news_user_view&id=2818789072> [Accessed 12 December 2016].
Estes, R., 1999. Hacia un índice de calidad de vida: enfoques empíricos para la evaluación del bienestar humano a nivel internacional. In: B. En Klisberg, ed. 1999. Pobreza: un tema impostergable. Caracas: CLAD-Fondo de Cultura Económica. pp.131-148.
Ezrow, L. and Xezonakis, G., 2016. Satisfaction with democracy and voter turnout A temporal perspective. Party Politics, 22(1), pp.3-14.
Feldman, B., 2008. The urban audit – Measuring the quality of life in European cities. Eurostat, Statistics in Focus, 82/2008, 8p.
Gómez Vilchis, R.R., 2014. Desencanto Democrático y Opinión Ciudadana sobre el Crimen en Latinoamérica. Polis, 10(2), pp.105-133.
Haq, M.U., 1995. Reflections on Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hoque, M.R., Uddin, R., Khan, M.M.R., Shumi, F.R. and Sarwar, F., 2016. The Impact Of Health Card On Citizens' Quality Of Life: Evidence In Bangladesh. European Scientific Journal, 12(6), pp.369-382.
Hossain, M.S., Zander, P.O., Kamal, M.S. and Chowdhury, L., 2015. Belief‐rule‐based expert systems for evaluation of e‐government: a case study. Expert Systems, 32(5), pp.563-577.
Hou, J. and Xiao, R., 2015. Identifying critical success factors of linkage mechanism between government and non-profit in the geo-disaster emergency decision. International Journal of Emergency Management, 11(2), pp.146-168.
Hutchinson, M.O., 1998. The use of fuzzy logic in business decision-making. Derivatives Quaterly, 4(4), pp.53-67.
Hwang, C. and Yoon, K., 1981. Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and application. New York: Springer.
Karimi, M., Azizi, M., Javanshir, H. and Ghomi, S., 2015. A hybrid approach based on SERVQUAL and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating banking service quality. Decision Science Letters, 4(3), pp.349-362.
Kestilä-Kekkonen, E. and Söderlund, P., 2015. Is it All about the Economy? Government Fractionalization, Economic Performance and Satisfaction with Democracy across Europe, 2002-13. Government and Opposition, pp.1-31.
Lewis, R.C. and Booms, B.H., 1983. The marketing aspects of service quality. In: G. Shostack, L. Berry and G. Upah, eds. 1983. Emerging perspectives on services marketing. Chicago: American Marketing. pp.99-107.
Linares, S., Mikkelsen, C.A., Velázquez, G.A. and Celemín, J.P., 2016. Spatial Segregation and Quality of Life: Empirical Analysis of Medium-Sized Cities of Buenos Aires Province. In: G. Tonon, ed. 2016. Indicators of Quality of Life in Latin America. Berlin: Springer. pp.201-218.
Lissitsa, S. and Chachashvili-Bolotin, S., 2016. Life satisfaction in the internet age-Changes in the past decade. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, pp.197-206.
Listhaug, O., 1984. Confidence in Institutions: Findings from the Norwegian Values Study. Acta Sociológica, 27(2), pp.111-122.
Lora, E., 2016. Using life satisfaction data to identify urban problems, prioritize local public expenditures and monitor the quality of urban life. In: M. Rojas, ed. 2016. Handbook of Happiness Research in Latin America. Amsterdam: Springer. pp.273-294.
Mamdani, E. and Assilian, S., 1975. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7(1), pp.1-13.
Mayne, Q. and Hakhverdian, A., 2016. Ideological Congruence and Citizen Satisfaction: Evidence from 25 Advanced Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 49, pp.1-28.
Mir, M.A., Ghazvinei, P.T., Sulaiman, N.M.N., Basri, N.E.A., Saheri, S., Mahmood, N.Z., Jahan, A., Begum, R.A. and Aghamohammadi, N., 2016. Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model. Journal of environmental management, 166, pp.109-115.
Morris, D., 1979. Measuring the Conditions of the World Poor, the Physical Quality of Life Index. New York: Pergamon Press.
Petrosillo, I., Costanza, R., Aretano, R., Zaccarelli, N. and Zurlini, G., 2013. The use of subjective indicators to assess how natural and social capital support residents’ quality of life in a small volcanic island. Ecological Indicators, 24, pp.609-620.
Plan Nacional del Buen Vivir, 2016. Mejorar la calidad de vida de la población. [online] Equador: Plan National para el Buen Vivir 2013 – 2017. Available at: <http://issuu.com/buen-vivir/docs/6_objetivo_3_fundamento_y_diagnosit/5?e=8910223/4203298> [Accessed 10 December 2016]
PNUD Ecuador, 2016. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo, Ecuador. [online] Available at: <http://www.ec.undp.org/> [01 April 2016].
Rahman, T., Mittelhammer, R.C. and Wandschneider, P.R., 2011. Measuring quality of life across countries: A multiple indicators and multiple causes approach. Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(1), pp.43-52.
Saeida Ardakani, S., Nejatian, M., Farhangnejad, M.A. and Nejati, M., 2015. A fuzzy approach to service quality diagnosis. Marketing Intelligence y Planning, 33(1), pp.103-119.
Slottje, D.J., 1991. Measuring the quality of life across countries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(4), pp.684-693.
Slottje, D.J., Scully, G.W., Hirschberg, J.G. and Hayes, K.J., 1991. Measuring the quality of life across countries: a multidimensional analysis. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sun, C.C. and Lin, G.T., 2009. Using fuzzy TOPSIS method for evaluating the competitive advantages of shopping websites. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), pp.11764-11771.
Tonon, G., 2015. Relevance of the Use of Qualitative Methods in the Study of Quality of Life. In: G. Tonon, ed. 2015. Qualitative Studies in Quality of Life. Berlin: Springer. pp.3-21.
Tonon, G. and Rodríguez de la Vega, L., 2016. Measuring Quality of Life and Inequalities in South America. In: G. Tonon, ed. 2016. Indicators of Quality of Life in Latin America. Berlin: Springer. pp.3-17.
Tsaur, S-H., Chang, T-Y. and Yen, C-H., 2002. The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. Tourism Management, 23(2), pp.107-115.
Viswanathan, M., 1999. Understanding how product attributes influence product categorization: development and validation of fuzzy set-based measures of gradedness in product categories. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), pp.75-95.
Xia, X., Wang, Z. and Gao, Y., 2000. Estimation of non-statistical uncertainty using fuzzy-set theory. Measurement Science and Technology, 11(4), pp.430-435.
Yeh, C.H. and Kuo, Y-L., 2003. Evaluating passenger services of Asia-Pacific international airports. Transportation Research E, 39(1), pp.35-48.
Yeh, C.H., Deng, H. and Chang, Y.H., 2000. Fuzzy multicriteria analysis for performance evaluation of bus companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 126(3), pp.459-473.
Zadeh, L., 1975. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning: I.. Information Science, 8(3), pp.199-249.
Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), pp.338-353.
Zeleny, M., 1982. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zeleny, M., 1998. Multiple criteria decision making: eight concepts of optimality. Human Systems Management, 17(2), pp.97-107.
Zhao, R. and Govind, R., 1991. Algebraic characteristics of extended fuzzy number. Information Science, 54(1), pp.103-130.
Zhu, J., 2001. Multidimensional quality-of-life measure with an application to Fortune’s best cities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(4), pp.263-284.
Zlateva, P., Velev, D. and Raeva, L., 2015. A Fuzzy Logic Method for Assessment of Risk Management Capability. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 6(4), pp.260-266.
Authors
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.