Lean Management “Quick-Wins”: Results of Implementation. A Case Study
Abstract
Purpose: This study comprised two main goals. The first goal demonstrates how LT (Lean Tools) allows the highest impact during the implementation phase.The second goal consisted of introducing procedure changes based on the Management of Human Resources through Lean Leadership tool. The target for these two objectives is to achieve an increase of 5% in machine occupancy rate and a reduction of 10% regarding the costs of defective products per hour.
Methodology/Approach: The research methodology is a Action-Research/Research-Action developed by Professor Kurt Lewin of MIT that goes through cycles of five stages: Diagnosis; Planning; Implementation; Evaluation, Conclusions.
Findings: Regarding the two objectives above mentioned, it was observed an increase of 8.5% in machine occupancy rate and a reduction of 27.9% regarding the costs per hour of defective products. It was created an additional motivation in the employees and very satisfying results in every production.
Research Limitation/implication: The study is limited to a Portuguese Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (SME) in the metalworking sector.
Originality/Value of paper: Lean tools can be rapidly and easily implemented and quickly understood by the workers. With that implementation, the occupation of the machines has increased and the defects and their costs have decreased, so the added value grows.
Full text article
References
Aas, T. and Alaassar, A., 2017. The impact of visualisation on decision-making in entrepreneurial processes. International Journal of Innovation Management, [e-journal] 22(5), p.1840002. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618400029.
Ahmed, M., 2014. Daily walks train future leaders. Industrial Management, 56(1), pp.22-27.
Andersson, R., Manfredsson, P. and Lantz, B., 2015. Total productive maintenance in support processes: an enabler for operation excellence. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, [e-journal] 26(9-10), pp.1042-1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1068598.
Araújo, R., Santos, G., Costa, J. and Sá, J.C., 2019. The Quality Management System as a Driver of Organizational Culture: An Empirical Study in the Portuguese Textile Industry. Quality Innovation Prosperity Journal, [e-journal] 23(1), pp.1-24. https://doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V23I1.1132.
Azizi, A., 2015. Evaluation Improvement of Production Productivity Performance using Statistical Process Control, Overall Equipment Efficiency, and Autonomous Maintenance. Procedia Manufacturing, [e-journal] 2, pp.186-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.032.
Bäckström, I. and Ingelsson, P., 2015. Is there a relationship between Lean Leaders and healthy co-workers?. Quality Innovation Prosperity Journal, [e-journal] 23(1), pp.123-136. https://doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V19I2.609.
Bateman, N., Philp, L. and Warrender, H., 2016. Visual management and shop floor teams – development, implementation and use. International Journal of Production Research, [e-journal] 54(24), pp.7345-7358. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1184349.
Bravi, L., Murmura, F. and Santos, G., 2017. Attitudes and Behaviours of Italian 3D Prosumer in the Era of Additive Manufacturing. Procédia Manufacturing, [e-journal] 13, pp.980-986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.095.
Bravi, L., Murmura, F. and Santos, G., 2018. Manufacturing Labs: where digital technologies help improve life quality. International Journal for Quality Research, [e-journal] 12(4), pp.957-974. https://doi.org/10.18421/IJQR12.04-11.
Bravi, L., Murmura, F. and Santos, G., 2019. The ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management System Standard:Companies’ Drivers, Benefits and Barriers to Its Implementation. Quality Innovation Prosperity Journal, [e-journal] 23(2), pp.64-82. https://doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V23I2.1277.
Campbell, J., 2018. SMART criteria. Amenia, NY: Salem Press Encyclopedia.
Carvalho, F., Santos, G. and Gonçalves, J., 2018. The disclosure of information on Sustainable Development on the corporate website of the certified Portuguese organizations. International Journal of Quality Research, [e-journal] 12(1), pp.253-276. https://doi.org/10.18421/IJQR12.01-14.
Costa, A.R., Barbosa, C., Santos, G. and Alves, M.R., 2019. Six Sigma: Main Metrics and R Based Software for Training Purposes and Practical Industrial Quality Control. Quality Innovation Prosperity Journal, [e-journal] 23(2), pp.83-99. https://doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V23I2.1278.
Czifra, G., 2017. Implementation Process of 5S for a Company in Real Life - Problems, Solutions, Successes. Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology, 25(41), pp.79-86.
Dana, B., 2015. The Gemba Walk - A Tool For Management and Leadership. Ovidius University Annals, Series Economic Sciences, 15(1), pp.450-455.
Doiro, M., Fernández, J.F., Félix, M.J. and Santos, G., 2017. ERP – machining centre integration: a modular kitchen production case study. Procedia Manufacturing, [e-journal] 13, pp.1159-1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.178.
Dombrowski, U. and Mielke T., 2014. Lean Leadership – 15 Rules for a Sustainable Lean Implementation. Procedia CIRP, [e-journal] 17, pp.565-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.146.
Filho, M.G., Ganga, G. and Gunasekaran, A., 2016. Lean manufacturing in Brazilian small and medium enterprises: implementation and effect on performance. International Journal of Production Research, 54(24), pp.7523-7545.
Gesinger, S., 2016. Experiential Learning: Using Gemba Walks to Connect With Employees. Professional Safety, 61(2), pp.33-36.
Krishnan, S., Dev, A., Suresh, R., Sumesh, A. and Rameshkumar, K., 2018. Bottleneck identification in a tyre manufacturing plant using simulation analysis and productivity improvement. Materials Today Proceedings, [e-journal] 5(11), pp.24720-24730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.270.
Lisiecka, K. and Burka, I., 2016. Lean Service Implementation Success Factors in Polish District Heating Companies. Quality Innovation Prosperity Journal, [e-journal] 20(1), pp.72-94. https://doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V20I1.640.
Mahendran, S. and Kumar A., 2018. Implementing lean manufacturing principle in an automobile valve manufacturing industry with simulation analysis – a case study. Journal of the Balkan Tribological Association, 24(3), pp.600-607.
Marques, C., Lopes, N., Santos, G., Delgado, I. and Delgado, P., 2018. Improving operator evaluation skills for defect classification using training strategy supported by attribute agreement analysis. Measurement, [e-journal] 119, pp.129-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.01.034.
Mehltretter, P., 2018. Applying Root Cause Analysis to Compressed Air: How to Solve Common Compressed Air System Problems with the 5-Whys. Energy Engineering, [e-journal] 115(4), pp.56-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/01998595.2018.12016673.
Minter, S., 2015. What Leaders Should Do on the Gemba. Industry Week/IW, 264 (5), pp.26-26.
Nestle, M., 2013. Gemba is Gold. Six Sigma Forum, 13(1), pp.32-36.
Neumann, J., 2013. Kurt Lewin’s constructive method rule. Business and management Editorials. [online] 13 May 2013. Available at: < https://www.bl.uk/business-and-management/editorials/kurt-lewins-constructive-method-rule > [Accessed 17 November 2019].
Oliveira, J., Sá, J.C. and Fernandes, A., 2017. Continuous improvement through “Lean Tools” – An application in a mechanical company. Procedia Manufacturing, [e-journal] 13, pp.1082-1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.139.
Pinto, H., Pimentel, C. and Cunha, M., 2016. Implications of Total Productive Maintenance in Psychological Sense of Ownership. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, [e-journal] 217, pp.1076-1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.114.
Rebelo, M., Silva, R., Santos, G. and Mendes, P., 2016. Model Based Integration of Management Systems (MSs) - Case Study. TQM Journal, [e-journal] 28(6), pp.907-932. https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-09-2014-0079.
Sá, J.C. and Oliveira J., 2013. Generating Value With TQM and Six Sigma. Proceedings of IRF2013. In: ABREU-PCO, 4th International Conference on Integrity, Reliability and Failure. Madeira, Portugal, 23-27 June 2013.
Santos, D., Rebelo, M. and Santos, G., 2017. The Integration of certified Management Systems. Case Study – Organizations located at the district of Braga, Portugal. Procedia Manufacturing, [e-journal] 13, pp.964-971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.168.
Santos, G., Afonseca, J., Murmura, F., Félix, M.J. and Lopes, N., 2018. Critical success factors in the management of ideas as an essential component of innovation and business excellence. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, [e-journal] 10(3), pp.214-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-05-2017-0051.
Santos, G. and Barbosa, J., 2006. QUALIFOUND - a modular tool developed for Quality Improvement in Foundries. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, [e-journal] 17(3), pp.351-362. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380610648308.
Santos, G. Bravi L. and Murmura, F., 2018. Fabrication laboratories: The development of new business models with new digital technologies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, [e-journal] 29(8), pp.1332-1357. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0072.
Santos, G., Doiro, M., Mandado, E. and Silva, R., 2019. Engineering learning objectives and computer assisted tools. European Journal of Engineering Education, [e-journal] 44(4), pp.616-628. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1563585.
Santos, G., Murmura, F. and Bravi, L., 2019. Developing a model of vendor rating to manage quality in the supply chain. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, [e-journal] 11(1), pp.34-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-06-2017-0058.
Schwagerman III, W. and Ulme, J.M., 2013. The A3 Lean Management and Leadership Thought Process. The Journal of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering 29(4), pp.1-10.
Sharma, K.M. and Lata, S., 2018. Effectuation of Lean Tool “5S” on Materials and Work Space Efficiency in a Copper Wire Drawing Micro-Scale Industry in India. Materials Today: Proceedings, [e-journal] 5(2), pp.4678-4683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.039.
Southworth, T., 2012. Gemba walks. Label & Narrow Web, 17(2), pp.38-39.
Stricker, N., Minguillon, F.E. and Lanza, G., 2017. Selecting key performance indicators for production with a linear programming approach. International Journal of Production Research, [e-journal] 55(19), pp.5537-5549. 10.1080/00207543.2017.1287444.
Todorovic, M. and Cupic, M. 2017. How Does 5s Implementation Affect Company Performance? A Case Study Applied to a Subsidiary of a Rubber Goods Manufacturer from Serbia. Engineering Economics, [e-journal] 28(3), pp.311-322. 10.5755/j01.ee.28.3.16115.
Verbano, C., Crema, M. and Nicosia, F., 2017. Visual management system to improve care planning and controlling: the case of intensive care unit. Production Planning & Control, [e-journal] 28(15), pp.1212-1222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1358830.
Veres, C., Marian, L., Moica, S. and Al-Akel, K., 2018. Case study concerning 5S method impact in an automotive company. Procedia Manufacturing, [e-journal] 22, 900-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.127.
Zalatar, W. and Siriban-Manalang, A., 2018. Development of a Composite Lean Index to Measure Lean Implementation in Philippine Manufacturing Companies. DLSU Business & Economics Review, 28(1), pp.176-188.
Zarbo, R., Varney, R., Copeland, J., D’Angelo, R. and Sharma, G., 2015. Daily Management System of the Henry Ford Production System. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, [e-journal] 144(1), pp.122-136. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPLQYMOFWU31CK.
Zgodavova, K., Hudec, O. and Palfy, P., 2017. Culture of quality: insight into foreign organisations in Slovakia. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, [e-journal] 28(9-10), pp.1054-1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1309120.
Zhu, L., Johnsson, C., Varisco, M. and Schiraldi, M., 2018. Key performance indicators for manufacturing operations management – gap analysis between process industrial needs and ISO 22400 standard. Procedia Manufacturing, [e-journal] 25, pp.82-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.060.
Authors
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Authors who publish with the Quality Innovation Prosperity agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.